Illustration for hero in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).

The AI Files · Rosatom/ARMZ acquisition of Uranium One, CFIUS and NRC approvals, Frank Giustra and Ian Telfer Clinton Foundation donations, Bill Clinton’s 2010 Moscow speech, Clinton Cash/NYT 2015 coverage, and 2017–2026 oversight fights including the TENEX/Campbell informant track · 2005–2026

Uranium One

A Russian state nuclear company takes control of a Canadian miner with U.S. licenses. Donors tied to the deal give to the Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 to speak in Moscow. Campaigns say she sold America’s uranium. Nine agencies sat on CFIUS. Only the President could block. No public finding has shown she traded approval for cash.

This guide follows UrAsia and Frank Giustra, the 2007 merger and Giustra’s exit, ARMZ’s climb to 51 percent, Jose Fernandez’s CFIUS seat, the NRC’s no-export license transfers, Ian Telfer’s Fernwood gifts, Renaissance Capital’s speech fee, Clinton Cash and the New York Times, the TENEX/Mikerin case, and William Campbell’s informant fight — then rates pay-to-play, 20-percent slogans, veto myths, and ‘nothing happened’ framings against that critical path. Money can be real while a quid remains unproven.

Read the story Explore the files

Illustration for hero in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Image: Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

The story

The story

From Kazakh mines and Foundation gifts to CFIUS, Clinton Cash, and the informant wars — chapter by chapter.

Illustration for mining in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for mining in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 1

The mines before the meme

Before anyone yelled about “20 percent,” Canadian dealmakers assembled uranium assets from Kazakhstan to the American West. UrAsia Energy’s story — and Frank Giustra’s role in it — is the necessary prologue. [1] [2] [3]

Illustration for giustra in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for giustra in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 2

Giustra’s millions, mostly early

Giustra’s huge Clinton Foundation philanthropy is real. So is the calendar: the bulk of the famous figure sits in 2005–07, before Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State and before Rosatom’s 2010 majority deal. [3] [4] [5]

Illustration for docs in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for docs in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 3

He sells the stock

If the theory is that Giustra bought a future CFIUS vote with Foundation gifts, the 2007 exit matters. PolitiFact and Snopes stress he was out of the equity years before ARMZ took 51 percent. [5] [4] [6]

Illustration for hillary in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for hillary in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 4

Secretary Clinton, nine chairs

In 2009 she takes State under an ethics understanding about Foundation disclosures. She also becomes one of nine CFIUS voices — not the committee, and not the President. [7] [8] [9]

Illustration for uranium in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for uranium in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 5

ARMZ climbs to control

Rosatom’s mining arm moves from a minority position in 2009 to a June 8, 2010 agreement for not less than 51 percent of Uranium One, the Canadian company holding Wyoming in-situ recovery licenses. [10] [11] [4]

Illustration for bill in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for bill in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 6

Half a million in Moscow

Three weeks after the announcement — and before CFIUS approval — Renaissance Capital pays Bill Clinton $500,000 to speak in Moscow. The New York Times reported the bank’s analysts were talking up Uranium One stock. [12] [3] [11]

Illustration for cfius in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for cfius in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 7

What CFIUS can and cannot do

CFIUS can clear a deal. It cannot, by itself, kill one. Only the President can suspend or prohibit after the committee or a member recommends that path. In this case, none of the nine objected. [9] [13] [11]

Illustration for state in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for state in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 8

Fernandez’s seat

Jose Fernandez says he represented State on CFIUS and that “Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on any C.F.I.U.S. matter.” That is not a full brain-scan of the Secretary. It is the best on-record denial of personal intervention we have. [14] [3] [11]

Illustration for nrc in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for nrc in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 9

The NRC’s quieter gate

On November 24, 2010 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission approves transferring Wyoming recovery licenses. It also states the basic export rule later emphasized by FactCheck: no shipping that uranium to Russia without separate authority — authority NRC said was not granted. [15] [11] [16]

Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 10

Telfer’s Fernwood gifts

Uranium One chairman Ian Telfer’s family foundation gives about $2.35 million across the Russian-control years. Those gifts were not cleanly visible in the Foundation’s public donor disclosures the ethics story demanded — a failure the Foundation later called a mistake. [17] [3] [18]

Illustration for rosatom in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for rosatom in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 11

Russia finishes the buy

By 2013 Rosatom’s control is complete. Pravda-era chest-beating about nuclear reach is not a U.S. court finding — but the ownership change is real. [19] [3]

Illustration for schweizer in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for schweizer in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 12

Clinton Cash, then the Times

Peter Schweizer’s *Clinton Cash* and the April 23, 2015 New York Times investigation put the donations and the Moscow speech on the front page. They document money and timing. They do not document a traded vote. [20] [3] [21]

Illustration for trump in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for trump in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 13

“She sold 20 percent”

Campaign stages compress licensed in-situ recovery capacity into “20 percent of America’s uranium,” then staple on Foundation cash. FactCheck, PolitiFact, and Snopes take the slogan apart: capacity ≠ reserves; nine agencies ≠ one seller; donations ≠ proven purchase of approval. [22] [23] [4] [6]

Illustration for doj in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for doj in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 14

A different Russian nuclear case

Vadim Mikerin’s TENEX corruption case is a real Rosatom-subsidiary prosecution. It is also the on-ramp for 2017 claims that an FBI informant could “blow up” Uranium One. Adjacent is not identical. [24] [11] [25]

Illustration for fbi in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for fbi in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 15

The informant fight

William Campbell’s lawyer and Republican overseers promise connective tissue to the Clintons. Democratic summaries of a DOJ briefing and of Campbell’s interview say he did not deliver Clinton/Foundation/CFIUS quid evidence — and that prosecutors doubted his credibility as a trial witness. [26] [27] [28] [29]

Illustration for path in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for path in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 16

Path tease — sixteen links

If a theory needs Hillary Clinton to have sold America’s uranium for Foundation cash, it must break or recast the capacity definition, the nine-member structure, Fernandez’s account, the Giustra exit timing, and the absence of a public bribe finding. [#path] [11] [21]

1. Canadian assets assembled — UrAsia / Kazakhstan to Wyoming

2. Giustra philanthropy — mostly pre-State

3. Giustra exits the stock — 2007

4. Secretary + ethics MOU — 2009

5. ARMZ accumulates — 2009 minority

6. ≥51% announced — 8 Jun 2010

7. Moscow speech fee — $500,000

8. State’s CFIUS seat — Fernandez

9. No member objects — only President can block

10. NRC transfer, no export — 24 Nov 2010

11. Telfer / Fernwood gifts — ~$2.35M

12. Full Rosatom ownership — 2013

13. Clinton Cash + NYT — Apr 2015

14. Slogan vs capacity — 2016

15. Informant ≠ Clinton quid — 2017–18

16. Oversight without a settled bribe — through 2026

Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 17

What the emails guide already holds

Private email, Midyear Exam, the hacks, and the broader Foundation wars live next door. Use the emails-and-Foundation full guide for that spine; this page owns the uranium deal’s mechanics and the claim fight around it. [30]

Illustration for web in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for web in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 18

Hard stops

Ukraine-war topics are out. Grokipedia is never a source. Sibling Clinton scandals (Travelgate, Benghazi, Lewinsky) are doors, not chapters. [31] [32] [33] [34] [35]

Illustration for capitol in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for capitol in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 19

Where the record stands

Donations and the speech are documented. CFIUS’s structure and the NRC’s export limits are documented. A proven sale of a CFIUS vote for Foundation cash is not. That asymmetry is the story’s unresolved political fuel — and the reason Theories must name which critical-path steps they break. [21] [11] [36]

Illustration for couple in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for couple in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.

Chapter 20

Nested under The Clinton Files

This full guide lives on the Clinton hub’s Full guides shelf. The thin `/files/clintons/uranium-one/` page stays as a MAINTAINED RECORD gateway so old links still work. There is no new homepage peer card. [37] [38]

Sources for the story
  1. 2007 UrAsia Energy – Uranium One merger context
  2. Kazakhstan mines as Russian strategic interest (NYT/NPR)
  3. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  4. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  5. Giustra stake sale timing (PolitiFact / Snopes / NYT context)
  6. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
  7. Obama White House ethics agreement / Foundation donor disclosure expectations
  8. CFIUS nine voting members listed
  9. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  10. Uranium One announcement — ARMZ ≥51% (8 Jun 2010)
  11. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  12. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
  13. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  14. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  15. NRC news release — Uranium One license transfers (24 Nov 2010)
  16. FactCheck update — later ~10% ISR capacity; low production share
  17. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  18. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  19. Rosatom full ownership / Uranium One Holding (2013)
  20. Peter Schweizer — Clinton Cash (2015)
  21. FactCheck: no evidence donations/speech influenced NRC or CFIUS approvals
  22. 2016 campaign slogan use — ‘sold 20%… funneled $145 million’
  23. NRC / FactCheck on ~20% licensed ISR capacity (2010)
  24. DOJ — Vadim Mikerin sentencing / TENEX corruption case (2015)
  25. The Hill — FBI informant / Russia nuclear corruption coverage (Oct 2017, John Solomon et al.)
  26. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  27. Reuters — Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale (Democrats)
  28. CNN — Democrats say Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons (8 Mar 2018)
  29. William D. Campbell identified as TENEX/Mikerin FBI confidential source
  30. The AI Files — The Clintons: emails and the Foundation (full guide)
  31. Hard stop — Ukraine war out of scope
  32. Method — never cite Grokipedia
  33. The AI Files — Travelgate full guide
  34. The AI Files — Benghazi full guide
  35. The AI Files — Lewinsky impeachment full guide
  36. Grassley letter and released FBI records — Uranium One and foundation inquiries (27 Apr 2026)
  37. The Clinton Files hub
  38. The Clinton Files — Uranium One short case (gateway)

Explore

Go deeper, era by era

Pick an era, or search everything at once: entries, people, dated events, claims, theories and media.

Threads

Follow one thread through the whole story

Each thread pulls together the entries on one question, across all the eras.

Key people

Who was who

The Clintons, Giustra, Telfer, Fernandez, Schweizer, CFIUS/NRC institutions, Mikerin, Campbell, and the oversight cast.

Hillary Rodham ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonSecretary of State (2009–13); CFIUS member agency head

One of nine CFIUS voices; Fernandez says she never intervened with him on any CFIUS matter. Campaign target of ‘sold uranium’ slogans.

Sources
  1. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
Bill ClintonBill ClintonFormer president; Foundation rainmaker; Moscow speaker

Paid $500,000 by Renaissance Capital for a 29 June 2010 Moscow speech while the Uranium One majority deal awaited U.S. review.

Sources
  1. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
  2. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Frank GiustraFrank GiustraMining financier; UrAsia figure; major Foundation donor

Associated with the Canadian uranium circle and large Foundation gifts; says he sold Uranium One stakes in 2007 — before the 2010 Rosatom majority deal.

Sources
  1. Giustra stake sale timing (PolitiFact / Snopes / NYT context)
  2. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  3. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
Ian TelferIan TelferUranium One chairman; Fernwood Foundation donor

NYT traced about $2.35 million in family-foundation gifts during the Russian-control years; said donations supported Giustra’s charitable work with Bill Clinton, not a deal ask.

Sources
  1. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  2. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Jose FernandezJose FernandezAssistant Secretary of State; State’s CFIUS representative

Told the New York Times he represented State on CFIUS and that Clinton never intervened with him on any CFIUS matter.

Sources
  1. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  2. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Peter SchweizerPeter SchweizerAuthor of Clinton Cash

2015 book seeded Uranium One–Foundation coverage; FactCheck contested his ‘veto power’ phrasing.

Sources
  1. Peter Schweizer — Clinton Cash (2015)
  2. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  3. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
Jo BeckerJo BeckerNew York Times reporter

Co-author of the 23 April 2015 investigation into Foundation cash amid the Russian uranium deal.

Sources
  1. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  2. NPR — Clinton Foundation Linked To Russian Effort To Buy Uranium Company (23 Apr 2015)
Mike McIntireMike McIntireNew York Times reporter

Co-author with Becker of the April 2015 Uranium One / Foundation story.

Sources
  1. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
Barack ObamaBarack ObamaPresident; sole authority to block CFIUS-covered deals

Institutional end of the CFIUS chain: only the President can suspend or prohibit after a referral. No public presidential block occurred on Uranium One.

Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  2. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Vadim MikerinVadim MikerinTENEX / Rosatom-subsidiary executive; convicted 2015

Sentenced in a U.S. money-laundering / corruption case involving Russian nuclear sales logistics — a real case often mashed into Uranium One politics.

Sources
  1. DOJ — Vadim Mikerin sentencing / TENEX corruption case (2015)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
William D. CampbellWilliam D. CampbellFBI confidential source in TENEX/Mikerin matter

2017–18 political flashpoint; Democratic summaries of DOJ briefing and his interview say he offered no Clinton quid evidence and that prosecutors doubted his trial credibility.

Sources
  1. William D. Campbell identified as TENEX/Mikerin FBI confidential source
  2. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  3. Reuters — Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale (Democrats)
  4. CNN — Democrats say Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons (8 Mar 2018)
Victoria ToensingVictoria ToensingAttorney for the informant

Pressed to free Campbell to talk to Congress about the Rosatom-related criminal probe and alleged political pressure.

Sources
  1. Sen. Chuck Grassley — letters on Uranium One / informant (Oct 2017)
  2. The Hill — FBI informant / Russia nuclear corruption coverage (Oct 2017, John Solomon et al.)
Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleySenate Judiciary / oversight

2017 letters on Uranium One/informant; April 2026 letter releasing FBI preliminary records and asking what inquiries concluded.

Sources
  1. Sen. Chuck Grassley — letters on Uranium One / informant (Oct 2017)
  2. Grassley letter and released FBI records — Uranium One and foundation inquiries (27 Apr 2026)
Devin NunesDevin NunesHouse Intelligence chair (2017)

Publicly framed reset-era decisions as potentially benefiting the Clinton Foundation while pursuing informant channels.

Sources
  1. Rep. Devin Nunes comments on informant / reset-era decisions (Fox, Oct 2017 via FactCheck)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Elijah CummingsElijah CummingsHouse Oversight ranking member (2017–18)

Co-signed Democratic releases arguing DOJ contradicted Republican Clinton–quid claims about the informant.

Sources
  1. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  2. Reuters — Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale (Democrats)
Adam SchiffAdam SchiffHouse Intelligence ranking member (2017–18)

Joined Oversight Democrats in publishing the Campbell/DOJ briefing summary.

Sources
  1. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  2. CNN — Democrats say Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons (8 Mar 2018)
Brian FallonBrian FallonClinton campaign spokesman (2015)

Denied any evidence Clinton took State action to benefit Foundation donors on the uranium deal.

Sources
  1. Brian Fallon / Clinton campaign denial of evidence (via NYT/NPR 2015)
  2. NPR — Clinton Foundation Linked To Russian Effort To Buy Uranium Company (23 Apr 2015)
  3. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
John SolomonJohn SolomonThe Hill reporter (2017 revival)

Co-byline on Hill pieces that re-centered the FBI informant in Uranium One politics.

Sources
  1. The Hill — FBI informant / Russia nuclear corruption coverage (Oct 2017, John Solomon et al.)
  2. Sen. Chuck Grassley — letters on Uranium One / informant (Oct 2017)
Donald TrumpDonald Trump2016 candidate popularizing the slogan

Compressed the story into paid-approval / 20% uranium lines PolitiFact and FactCheck rejected as stated.

Sources
  1. 2016 campaign slogan use — ‘sold 20%… funneled $145 million’
  2. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Mitt RomneyMitt Romney2015 commentator

Said Foundation money around the deal ‘looks like bribery’ — a political reaction FactCheck notes alongside the evidence gap.

Sources
  1. 2015 GOP reactions (Romney ‘looks like bribery’; Paul investigation call) via FactCheck
  2. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
Rand PaulRand PaulSenator; called for investigation (2015)

Early Republican demand for a probe after Clinton Cash/NYT week.

Sources
  1. 2015 GOP reactions (Romney ‘looks like bribery’; Paul investigation call) via FactCheck
  2. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
John BarrassoJohn BarrassoWyoming senator; NRC correspondence

Received NRC explanations (via FactCheck’s reconstruction) about export licensing after the transfer.

Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  2. FactCheck update — later ~10% ISR capacity; low production share
Rosatom (institution)Rosatom (institution)Russian state nuclear corporation

Parent of ARMZ; ultimate controller of Uranium One after the multi-step acquisition.

Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  2. Uranium One announcement — ARMZ ≥51% (8 Jun 2010)
  3. Rosatom full ownership / Uranium One Holding (2013)
ARMZ / AtomredmetzolotoARMZ / AtomredmetzolotoRosatom mining arm

Entity that agreed in June 2010 to take not less than 51% of Uranium One.

Sources
  1. Uranium One announcement — ARMZ ≥51% (8 Jun 2010)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
CFIUS (institution)CFIUS (institution)Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States

Nine-member interagency committee that reviewed the transaction under confidentiality rules.

Sources
  1. CFIUS nine voting members listed
  2. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Nuclear Regulatory CommissionNuclear Regulatory CommissionU.S. nuclear licensing regulator

Approved Wyoming license transfers; stated export limits FactCheck treats as central.

Sources
  1. NRC news release — Uranium One license transfers (24 Nov 2010)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. NRC / FactCheck on ~20% licensed ISR capacity (2010)
Renaissance CapitalRenaissance CapitalRussian investment bank; speech sponsor

Paid Clinton’s $500k fee; NYT described Kremlin ties and bullish Uranium One research.

Sources
  1. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
  2. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Uranium One Inc.Uranium One Inc.Canadian miner with U.S. ISR licenses

Target company; Wyoming capacity figure became the slogan’s raw material.

Sources
  1. Uranium One announcement — ARMZ ≥51% (8 Jun 2010)
  2. NRC / FactCheck on ~20% licensed ISR capacity (2010)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Fernwood FoundationFernwood FoundationTelfer family charity

Vehicle NYT used to document Telfer’s multimillion gifts not fully visible in Clinton Foundation public lists.

Sources
  1. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  2. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
Clinton FoundationClinton FoundationFamily philanthropy

Recipient of Giustra/Telfer-linked funds; acknowledged disclosure mistakes in 2015. Broader Foundation fights: emails guide.

Sources
  1. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  2. Obama White House ethics agreement / Foundation donor disclosure expectations
  3. The AI Files — The Clintons: emails and the Foundation (full guide)
Eugene KielyEugene KielyFactCheck.org writer

Byline on the 2015 veto piece and 2017 Facts on Uranium One explainer used throughout this guide.

Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Chris WallaceChris WallaceFox News Sunday host (2015 interview)

Pressed Schweizer on the lack of hard evidence Clinton acted on the nine-agency panel.

Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
TENEX (institution)TENEX (institution)Rosatom subsidiary / U.S. nuclear sales channel

Corporate setting of the Mikerin kickback case that later entangled Uranium One politics.

Sources
  1. DOJ — Vadim Mikerin sentencing / TENEX corruption case (2015)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)

Timeline

Day by day

32 dated events, 2005–2026, each with its source.

  1. 2005–07
    UrAsia assets Canadian circle builds uranium assets including Kazakhstan mines and a path to U.S. licenses. UrAsia & the mines · source source
  2. 2005–07
    Giustra Foundation gifts Large Giustra-linked donations to Clinton philanthropy — bulk before HRC at State. Giustra & the Foundation · source source
  3. 2007
    UrAsia–Uranium One merger path Corporate combination keeps Uranium One name/Toronto base; shareholder identities shift. Merger and exit · source source
  4. Fall 2007
    Giustra sells stake Giustra says he exits Uranium One equity ~18+ months before HRC becomes Secretary. Merger and exit · source source
  5. Jan 2009
    Clinton becomes Secretary Ethics MOU expectations on Foundation donor disclosure accompany the job. Secretary Clinton · source source
  6. 2009
    ARMZ minority stake Rosatom mining arm begins accumulating Uranium One shares (~17% path per PolitiFact timeline). ARMZ takes control · source source
  7. 8 Jun 2010
    ≥51% agreement announced Uranium One announces ARMZ will take not less than 51%. ARMZ takes control · source source
  8. 29 Jun 2010
    Moscow speech Renaissance Capital pays Bill Clinton $500,000; analysts bullish on Uranium One per NYT. Moscow speech · source source
  9. 2010
    Fernandez on CFIUS State’s seat handled by Jose Fernandez; later tells NYT no HRC intervention with him. CFIUS review · source source
  10. Oct 2010
    CFIUS clears None of nine members object; only President could block — and does not. CFIUS review · source source
  11. 24 Nov 2010
    NRC license transfers Wyoming ISR licenses transferred; no export to Russia without separate authority. NRC licenses · source source
  12. 2009–12
    Telfer / Fernwood donations About $2.35M via family foundation during Russian-control years; disclosure incomplete. Telfer donations · source source
  13. 2013
    Full Rosatom ownership Russians complete takeover; company later styled Uranium One Holding in coverage. Full Russian ownership · source source
  14. 23 Apr 2015
    Clinton Cash + NYT Schweizer’s book and Becker/McIntire story nationalize donations + speech. Clinton Cash & NYT · source source
  15. Apr 2015
    Foundation ‘mistakes’ Clinton Foundation acknowledges disclosure failures after NYT story. Clinton Cash & NYT · source source
  16. 28 Apr 2015
    FactCheck: no veto Kiely: Schweizer wrong that Clinton had veto power / could alone stop the deal. The 20% slogan · source
  17. Jun 2016
    ‘Sold 20%’ on the trail Trump-era compression; PolitiFact rejects paid-to-approve framing. The 20% slogan · source source
  18. 2015
    Mikerin sentenced TENEX-related corruption case ends in U.S. sentence — separate from CFIUS quid proof. TENEX / Mikerin · source source
  19. Oct 2017
    Hill / informant revival Solomon coverage + Grassley letters put Campbell back into Uranium One politics. Campbell informant · source source
  20. 26 Oct 2017
    FactCheck recap Updated explainer: structure, capacity, donations, still no evidence of influence on approvals. Campbell informant · source source
  21. 15 Dec 2017
    DOJ staff briefing Democrats later publish summary: Campbell credibility concerns; no Clinton allegations in DOJ interactions. Campbell informant · source source
  22. 7 Feb 2018
    Campbell interview Dem summary: no quid evidence involving Clintons or improper influence on the sale. Campbell informant · source source
  23. Mar 2018
    Dem memo public Cummings/Schiff packet and press coverage undercut informant-as-Clinton-bombshell narrative. Campbell informant · source source
  24. 2017–18
    House probes continue Republicans press investigation; Reuters notes absence of established wrongdoing findings. Campbell informant · source source
  25. 27 Apr 2026
    Grassley FBI records letter Oversight letter + preliminary investigation records; asks what inquiries concluded — allegations ≠ findings. After the probes · source
  26. 24 Oct 2026
    AI Files full guide Uranium One rebuilt as deep story-first guide under Clinton hub. After the probes · source source
  27. n/a
    Ukraine hard stop Ukraine-war topics excluded from this guide. Sibling doors · source source
  28. 2010 vs 2017
    Capacity shrinks in context FactCheck update: more ISR licenses → Uranium One share of licensed ISR capacity ~10%; production share lower. NRC licenses · source source
  29. mid-2000s
    Kazakhstan focus Reporting: Russian interest weighted toward Central Asian mines; U.S. licenses triggered CFIUS. UrAsia & the mines · source source
  30. Apr 2015
    Romney / Paul reactions ‘Looks like bribery’ / investigate — political reception, not a verdict. Clinton Cash & NYT · source source
  31. Apr 2015
    Campaign denial Fallon: no shred of evidence of State action for donors on this deal. Clinton Cash & NYT · source source

What we know now

What we know now

What FactCheck and the NYT settled, what oversight reopened, and what still divides camps.

Illustration for couple in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
24 Oct 2026

AI Files deep guide replaces the thin nest as maintained record

Short case page remains as gateway; hub Full guides lists Uranium One; emails/Foundation guide stays the sibling for Midyear and private email.

Source: The Clinton Files hub

Read the full entry

The yardstick

The critical path

Sixteen links the mainstream account needs — each tied to a dated event.

  1. 1
    2005–07Canadian assets assembled

    UrAsia/Canadian circle builds uranium assets including lucrative Kazakhstan stakes and later U.S. licenses.[1][2][3]

    On the timeline
  2. 2
    2005–07Giustra philanthropy

    Frank Giustra becomes a major Clinton Foundation donor in the mid-2000s — mostly before Hillary is Secretary.[3][4][5]

    On the timeline
  3. 3
    Fall 2007Giustra exits the stock

    After the 2007 merger path, Giustra sells his Uranium One stake — years before the 2010 majority deal.[5][4][6]

    On the timeline
  4. 4
    Jan 2009Secretary + ethics MOU

    Hillary Clinton becomes Secretary of State under an ethics understanding about Foundation disclosures.[7][8][9]

    On the timeline
  5. 5
    2009ARMZ accumulates

    Rosatom’s mining arm builds toward control with an early minority stake in 2009.[4][9][10]

    On the timeline
  6. 6
    8 Jun 2010≥51% announced

    8 June 2010: Uranium One announces ARMZ will take not less than 51%.[10][9][3]

    On the timeline
  7. 7
    29 Jun 2010Moscow speech fee

    29 June 2010: Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 by Renaissance Capital amid the pending review.[11][3][9]

    On the timeline
  8. 8
    2010State’s CFIUS seat

    Jose Fernandez represents State; says Clinton never intervened with him on any CFIUS matter.[12][3][13]

    On the timeline
  9. 9
    Oct 2010No member objects

    October 2010: none of CFIUS’s nine members object; only the President could have blocked.[9][13][14][15]

    On the timeline
  10. 10
    24 Nov 2010NRC transfer, no export

    24 Nov 2010: NRC approves Wyoming license transfers; uranium not exportable to Russia without separate authority.[16][9][17]

    On the timeline
  11. 11
    2009–12Telfer / Fernwood gifts

    Chairman Ian Telfer’s family foundation donates about $2.35 million, incompletely disclosed at the time.[18][3][19]

    On the timeline
  12. 12
    2013Full Rosatom ownership

    2013: Russians complete ownership of the company.[20][3][9]

    On the timeline
  13. 13
    23 Apr 2015Clinton Cash + NYT

    April 2015: Schweizer’s book and Becker/McIntire put donations and the speech on the national front page.[21][3][13]

    On the timeline
  14. 14
    Jun 2016Slogan vs capacity

    2016 campaigns compress the story into ‘sold 20% of our uranium’ — a capacity figure, not a personal sale.[22][17][23][4][6]

    On the timeline
  15. 15
    7 Feb 2018Informant ≠ Clinton quid

    2017–18: TENEX/Campbell track revives politics; DOJ/Dem summaries say no Clinton/Foundation/CFIUS allegations from him in their interactions.[24][25][26][27][28]

    On the timeline
  16. 16
    27 Apr 2026Oversight without a settled bribe

    Through 2026 oversight letters and releases, the public record still lacks a finding that donations bought CFIUS approval.[29][30][31][9]

    On the timeline
Sources for the 16 steps
  1. 2007 UrAsia Energy – Uranium One merger context
  2. Kazakhstan mines as Russian strategic interest (NYT/NPR)
  3. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  4. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  5. Giustra stake sale timing (PolitiFact / Snopes / NYT context)
  6. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
  7. Obama White House ethics agreement / Foundation donor disclosure expectations
  8. NPR — Clinton Foundation Linked To Russian Effort To Buy Uranium Company (23 Apr 2015)
  9. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  10. Uranium One announcement — ARMZ ≥51% (8 Jun 2010)
  11. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
  12. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  13. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  14. CFIUS nine voting members listed
  15. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  16. NRC news release — Uranium One license transfers (24 Nov 2010)
  17. NRC / FactCheck on ~20% licensed ISR capacity (2010)
  18. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  19. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  20. Rosatom full ownership / Uranium One Holding (2013)
  21. Peter Schweizer — Clinton Cash (2015)
  22. 2016 campaign slogan use — ‘sold 20%… funneled $145 million’
  23. FactCheck update — later ~10% ISR capacity; low production share
  24. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  25. Reuters — Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale (Democrats)
  26. CNN — Democrats say Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons (8 Mar 2018)
  27. William D. Campbell identified as TENEX/Mikerin FBI confidential source
  28. DOJ — Vadim Mikerin sentencing / TENEX corruption case (2015)
  29. Grassley letter and released FBI records — Uranium One and foundation inquiries (27 Apr 2026)
  30. Reuters — Republicans press U.S.-Russia uranium deal probe despite no wrongdoing findings
  31. FactCheck: no evidence donations/speech influenced NRC or CFIUS approvals

OTHER READINGS

How camps tell the same deal differently

Each major framing measured against the critical path: what it must deny or recast, and what it adds.

Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
Unproven

Pay-to-play / quid pro quo

Foundation gifts and the Moscow fee purchased State’s silence or assent on CFIUS.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seatbreaks
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quidrecast
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Mechanism linking dollars to nine-agency non-objectionNo evidence
  18. +Ask/offer evidenceThin evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Clinton Cash + NYT 2015 money-and-timing package, later campaign compression.[6][1][7]

Why it lives

Dominant critical theory whenever Russia + Clintons are in the same sentence.

If it were true

Uranium One is a completed corruption story the public record has not formally proved.

How it squares with the record

Telfer gifts and the speech fee are real and poorly timed. [2] [3]

FactCheck still finds no evidence they influenced approvals; Fernandez denies intervention. [4] [5]

What holds up Unproven

Strong on appearance; weak on mechanism and proof.

Against the critical path
  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seatbreaks
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quidrecast
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Mechanism linking dollars to nine-agency non-objectionNo evidence
  18. +Ask/offer evidenceThin evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 8. State’s CFIUS seat must deny Must reject Fernandez’s no-intervention account as false/limited What has to be fake or wrong: That State’s seat was not leaned on by HRC[5]
  • 15. Informant ≠ Clinton quid must recast Treat absence of public quid as cover-up What has to be fake or wrong: That Dem/DOJ summaries settle Campbell[8]
Adds to the critical path
  • Mechanism linking dollars to nine-agency non-objection No evidence Still missing in public record[4]
  • Ask/offer evidence Thin evidence Suspicion denser than documents[1]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • FactCheck’s no-influence bottom line as complete
What new information would make it true
  • Documentary evidence a CFIUS posture changed for Foundation reasons
  • Credible witness to an ask/offer tied to the vote
What would prove it false
  • Complete CFIUS file showing routine non-objection without Clinton involvement
Books and films that argue it
Clinton CashCash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium DealGrassley letter with FBI Uranium One / Foundation records
Related
Clinton was paid (via Foundation gifts / speech fees) to approve the Uranium One deal.Ian Telfer’s donations are smoking-gun proof of a quid pro quo.Steelman: pay-to-play‘Paid to approve’Telfer’s $2.35 million
Sources
  1. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  2. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  3. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
  4. FactCheck: no evidence donations/speech influenced NRC or CFIUS approvals
  5. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  6. Peter Schweizer — Clinton Cash (2015)
  7. 2016 campaign slogan use — ‘sold 20%… funneled $145 million’
  8. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
Illustration for uranium in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for uranium in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
False

She sold America’s uranium

Personal conveyance of ~20% of U.S. uranium to Putin.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objectsbreaks
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacitybreaks
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Personal deed of uranium saleNo evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Capacity figure + Russian ownership compressed into a verb (‘sold’).[2][1][4]

Why it lives

Sticky meme; survives fact-checks by ignoring them.

If it were true

One cabinet secretary alienated a fifth of the nation’s uranium stock.

How it squares with the record

Wyoming ISR capacity share existed as an NRC/FactCheck number. [1]

It was never ‘sold’ by Clinton as title to national reserves. [3] [4]

What holds up False

Fails definitionally.

Against the critical path
  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objectsbreaks
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacitybreaks
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Personal deed of uranium saleNo evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 14. Slogan vs capacity must deny Must reject capacity definition What has to be fake or wrong: NRC/FactCheck ISR framing[1]
  • 9. No member objects must deny Must invent unilateral sale authority What has to be fake or wrong: Nine members + presidential block only[5][6]
Adds to the critical path
  • Personal deed of uranium sale No evidence Does not exist in cited record[3]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • CFIUS statute’s presidential-only prohibition rule
What new information would make it true
  • Evidence she personally transferred U.S. uranium title
What would prove it false
  • NRC capacity definition + CFIUS multi-agency structure
Books and films that argue it
The Facts on Uranium OneTrump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium dealDid Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
Related
Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia.Hillary Clinton personally decided and approved the Uranium One sale.‘She sold 20% of our uranium’What ‘20 percent’ actually measured
Sources
  1. NRC / FactCheck on ~20% licensed ISR capacity (2010)
  2. 2016 campaign slogan use — ‘sold 20%… funneled $145 million’
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  4. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
  5. CFIUS nine voting members listed
  6. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
Illustration for hillary in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for hillary in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
False

Silent veto / she could have stopped it

Even without a public ‘yes,’ her non-objection was a decisive choice she uniquely could reverse.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objectsrecast
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Suppressed State dissent memoNo evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Schweizer’s veto-power claim on Fox News Sunday.[1][5]

Why it lives

Softened into ‘she could have raised a red flag.’

If it were true

One dissenting memo from State would have forced Obama to own a block decision.

How it squares with the record

A member can recommend suspension and force presidential consideration. [1]

That is not unilateral veto; none objected; only the President blocks. [2] [3]

What holds up False

Kernel of member leverage; false as ‘veto/could alone stop.’

Against the critical path
  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objectsrecast
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Suppressed State dissent memoNo evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 9. No member objects must recast Treat non-objection as her personal green light What has to be fake or wrong: Multi-agency structure[4]
Adds to the critical path
  • Suppressed State dissent memo No evidence Not in public record[1]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • ‘Only the President can suspend or prohibit’ rule
What new information would make it true
  • Evidence she considered and suppressed a dissent for donor reasons
What would prove it false
  • FactCheck regulatory reading + unanimous non-objection record
Books and films that argue it
Clinton CashNo ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal
Related
As Secretary, Clinton had veto power and could have stopped the deal alone.No unilateral vetoNine members, one President
Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  2. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  4. CFIUS nine voting members listed
  5. Peter Schweizer — Clinton Cash (2015)
Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
Partly true

Ethics / appearance failure (without proven bribe)

The real scandal is conflict and disclosure, not a filmed quid.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled briberecast
  17. +Full contemporaneous donor transparencyThin evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

MOU expectations + Foundation ‘mistakes’ admission after NYT.[1][2][5]

Why it lives

Strongest bipartisan-legible critique among careful readers.

If it were true

Uranium One is chiefly a governance and transparency failure with ugly Russia optics.

How it squares with the record

Disclosure failures are admitted/documented. [2]

FactCheck still separates that from influence on approvals. [6]

What holds up Partly true

Best partial fit to the public record.

Against the critical path
  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled briberecast
  17. +Full contemporaneous donor transparencyThin evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 16. Oversight without a settled bribe must recast Treat ‘no bribe finding’ as incomplete if ethics failed What has to be fake or wrong: That criminal quid is the only standard[2]
Adds to the critical path
  • Full contemporaneous donor transparency Thin evidence Foundation admitted mistakes[2]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • Claim that disclosures were fully compliant in 2010–12
What new information would make it true
  • Further incomplete disclosures tied to deal actors
What would prove it false
  • Proof disclosures were complete and conflicts managed in real time
Books and films that argue it
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium DealGrassley letter with FBI Uranium One / Foundation records
Related
The only real issue is paperwork disclosure, not corruption risk.Ian Telfer’s donations are smoking-gun proof of a quid pro quo.Appearance of conflictDisclosure failures are real
Sources
  1. Obama White House ethics agreement / Foundation donor disclosure expectations
  2. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  3. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  4. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  5. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  6. FactCheck: no evidence donations/speech influenced NRC or CFIUS approvals
Illustration for giustra in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for giustra in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
False

Giustra bought the deal years ahead

Early megagifts prepaid a future Rosatom approval.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stockbreaks
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Hidden 2010 Giustra interestNo evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

$145M talking point dominated by Giustra’s number.[2][4]

Why it lives

Whenever totals are quoted without dates.

If it were true

A 2005–07 gift conspiracy foresaw the 2010 majority deal.

How it squares with the record

Gifts were huge and real. [4]

He sold the stake in 2007 — years before the majority deal and before State. [1] [2]

What holds up False

Fails the equity-timing test.

Against the critical path
  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stockbreaks
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Hidden 2010 Giustra interestNo evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 3. Giustra exits the stock must deny Must invent ongoing Giustra upside in 2010 What has to be fake or wrong: 2017–16 fact-check exit timing[1]
Adds to the critical path
  • Hidden 2010 Giustra interest No evidence Not shown in cited sources[2]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • Giustra’s 2007 sale account as reconstructed
What new information would make it true
  • Proof he retained a hidden 2010 interest + linked gifts to a future CFIUS plan
What would prove it false
  • 2007 exit + pre-State gift calendar
Books and films that argue it
Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium dealDid Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
Related
Frank Giustra’s $131M+ in Foundation gifts bought the 2010 Rosatom majority approval.Nine investors funneled $145 million to the Foundation while the Russian deal happened.He sold before the Russian majorityGiustra’s Foundation millions
Sources
  1. Giustra stake sale timing (PolitiFact / Snopes / NYT context)
  2. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  3. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
  4. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
Illustration for fbi in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for fbi in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
Discredited

Informant bombshell covered up

Campbell’s account proves Clinton–Russia uranium corruption; DOJ/Dems buried it.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quidbreaks
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Campbell Clinton-quid dossierNo evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

2017 Hill coverage + Grassley pressure to free the informant.[4][6]

Why it lives

In circles that treat Dem memos as inherently false.

If it were true

A withheld witness would rewrite 2010 as a proven bribe scheme.

How it squares with the record

TENEX/Mikerin corruption was real. [5]

Published DOJ/Dem summaries say Campbell gave no Clinton quid evidence and had credibility problems. [1] [2]

What holds up Discredited

Publicly collapsed; privately still believed by some.

Against the critical path
  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quidbreaks
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Campbell Clinton-quid dossierNo evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 15. Informant ≠ Clinton quid must deny Must reject Dem/DOJ ‘no Clinton allegation’ summaries What has to be fake or wrong: Briefing/interview accounts[1][2]
Adds to the critical path
  • Campbell Clinton-quid dossier No evidence Not produced publicly as claimed[3]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • DOJ credibility assessment as honest
What new information would make it true
  • Primary tapes/docs of Clinton-linked quid Campbell described under oath
What would prove it false
  • DOJ briefing + interview summaries as published
Books and films that argue it
DOJ briefing / Campbell interview Democratic summary
Related
The FBI informant proves the Clintons ran a uranium quid pro quo.The Mikerin/TENEX conviction is the Uranium One bribery case against the Clintons.Campbell’s alleged bombshellDOJ briefing: credibility + no Clinton alley
Sources
  1. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  2. Reuters — Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale (Democrats)
  3. CNN — Democrats say Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons (8 Mar 2018)
  4. The Hill — FBI informant / Russia nuclear corruption coverage (Oct 2017, John Solomon et al.)
  5. DOJ — Vadim Mikerin sentencing / TENEX corruption case (2015)
  6. Sen. Chuck Grassley — letters on Uranium One / informant (Oct 2017)
Illustration for cfius in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Illustration for cfius in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool). Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
Partly true

Routine interagency clearance

Ugly optics around an otherwise ordinary CFIUS/NRC process in a reset-era file.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech feerecast
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood giftsrecast
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Full ordinary-course CFIUS administrative recordThin evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Treasury process rules + Fernandez + FactCheck no-influence line.[6][2][1]

Why it lives

Default institutionalist telling.

If it were true

Uranium One is mostly a meme accident attached to real but non-causal money.

How it squares with the record

Structure and export limits are as FactCheck describes. [1] [7]

Disclosure failures and speech-fee optics remain. [4] [5]

What holds up Partly true

Necessary institutional half; incomplete as ‘nothing to see.’

Against the critical path
  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech feerecast
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood giftsrecast
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
  17. +Full ordinary-course CFIUS administrative recordThin evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 11. Telfer / Fernwood gifts must recast Treat Telfer gifts as unrelated philanthropy only What has to be fake or wrong: That timing/disclosure are material ethics facts[8][4]
  • 7. Moscow speech fee must recast Treat Moscow fee as ordinary speech market What has to be fake or wrong: That Renaissance/Uranium One promotion context matters[5]
Adds to the critical path
  • Full ordinary-course CFIUS administrative record Thin evidence Confidentiality blocks public confirmation[6]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • Claim that disclosure failures never happened
What new information would make it true
  • Released CFIUS staff memos showing ordinary risk acceptance
What would prove it false
  • Evidence of donor-driven posture
Books and films that argue it
The Facts on Uranium One
Related
Nothing improper happened — Uranium One is a pure smear.The only real issue is paperwork disclosure, not corruption risk.Steelman: institutional clearanceNine members, one President
Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  2. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  3. CFIUS nine voting members listed
  4. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  5. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
  6. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  7. NRC news release — Uranium One license transfers (24 Nov 2010)
  8. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)

Genuinely unknown

Still open

What remains unknown, partly known, or often misread.

Genuinely unknownWhat does the still-secret CFIUS file say?
What is known
  • Confidentiality rules generally bar public release of CFIUS notices and deliberations. [1]
  • None of the nine members objected, so there was no public presidential prohibition decision. [2]
What is not

Staff analyses, agency comment memos, and whether Clinton personally saw any briefing.

Why it is still open

Statutory confidentiality plus no presidential referral.

Does it change the story?

Soft influence cannot be fully audited from open sources.

What would settle it

Authorized release or leak of the Uranium One CFIUS administrative record.

Pay-to-play / quid pro quo Routine interagency clearance CFIUS confidentiality proves a cover-up of Clinton’s role.
Sources
  1. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
Genuinely unknownWas there any ask tying gifts to CFIUS posture?
What is known
  • Telfer denied discussing Uranium One with the Clintons. [1]
  • FactCheck finds no evidence donations/speech influenced approvals. [2]
What is not

Private conversations, intermediary messages, or unspoken expectations.

Why it is still open

No public contemporaneous ask document.

Does it change the story?

This is the difference between ugly optics and bribery.

What would settle it

Authenticated communications showing a trade.

Pay-to-play / quid pro quo Clinton was paid (via Foundation gifts / speech fees) to approve the Uranium One deal.
Sources
  1. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  2. FactCheck: no evidence donations/speech influenced NRC or CFIUS approvals
  3. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
Partly knownHow far does Fernandez’s denial reach?
What is known
  • He says he represented State and she never intervened with him on any CFIUS matter. [1]
What is not

Whether others at State briefed her, or whether non-Fernandez channels existed.

Why it is still open

One official’s lane is not the whole department.

Does it change the story?

Critics and defenders both over-read a single quote.

What would settle it

State email/memo record on Uranium One briefings to the Secretary.

Routine interagency clearance Pay-to-play / quid pro quo Hillary Clinton personally decided and approved the Uranium One sale.
Sources
  1. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  2. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Partly knownWhat exactly did Campbell tell Congress?
What is known
  • Democrats published a summary saying no Clinton quid evidence. [1] [2]
  • DOJ described credibility concerns per that memo. [3]
What is not

Full interview transcript Republicans reportedly did not approve for release.

Why it is still open

Partisan process fight over the record.

Does it change the story?

Informant mythology still circulates without a shared primary transcript.

What would settle it

Bipartisan release of the full Campbell interview transcript and exhibits.

Informant bombshell covered up The FBI informant proves the Clintons ran a uranium quid pro quo.
Sources
  1. Reuters — Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale (Democrats)
  2. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  3. CNN — Democrats say Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons (8 Mar 2018)
Known, often misreadDid Russia get 20% of U.S. uranium?
What is known
  • The 20% figure was licensed ISR capacity among few 2010 facilities — later ~10% capacity share; production shares lower; no authorized shipment to Russia per NRC via FactCheck. [1] [2] [3]
What is not

N/A — often misread, not unknown.

Why it is still open

Slogan reused a technical capacity fraction.

Does it change the story?

Clears the most viral falsehood.

What would settle it

Already settled by NRC/FactCheck definitions — public literacy is the gap.

She sold America’s uranium Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia.
Sources
  1. NRC / FactCheck on ~20% licensed ISR capacity (2010)
  2. FactCheck update — later ~10% ISR capacity; low production share
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  4. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
Partly knownWhat did FBI/DOJ inquiries ultimately conclude?
What is known
  • Grassley’s April 2026 letter releases preliminary records and asks what investigations concluded. [1]
What is not

Complete close-out memos for every related preliminary inquiry.

Why it is still open

Oversight letter frames unanswered conclusions.

Does it change the story?

Keeps 2026 readers from treating opening allegations as verdicts.

What would settle it

Public final closing memoranda.

Ethics / appearance failure (without proven bribe) Pay-to-play / quid pro quo Grassley’s April 2026 FBI releases prove Clinton Foundation crimes on Uranium One.
Sources
  1. Grassley letter and released FBI records — Uranium One and foundation inquiries (27 Apr 2026)
  2. The Clinton Files — Uranium One short case (gateway)
Partly knownWhy Renaissance Capital paid $500k when it did
What is known
  • Fee date sits between deal announcement and CFIUS approval; NYT reports bullish Uranium One research. [1] [2]
What is not

Internal bank motive memos; whether anyone linked the fee to CFIUS politics.

Why it is still open

Private corporate intent.

Does it change the story?

Speech-fee optics are half the scandal’s oxygen.

What would settle it

Renaissance decision record / communications with promoters.

Pay-to-play / quid pro quo Routine interagency clearance Clinton was paid (via Foundation gifts / speech fees) to approve the Uranium One deal.
Sources
  1. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
  2. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)

WHAT PEOPLE SAY

Claims, checked against the record

{n} popular claims about selling uranium, veto power, Giustra cash, and informant bombshells — each with points for, points against, and sources.

What the ratings mean
  • History Established narrative background.
  • Documented Supported by contemporaneous records or careful secondary reconstruction.
  • Official Government finding, regulation, or on-record official statement.
  • Mixed Partly supported; important caveats.
  • Partly true Real pieces, overreached whole.
  • Unproven Alleged; not established by cited record.
  • Disputed Serious conflict among sourced accounts.
  • False Contradicted by the cited record.
  • Discredited Collapsed under scrutiny in cited sources.
  • Cleared Investigators or fact-checkers reject the charge as stated.
  • Alleged Claim on record without adjudication here.
  • Context Framing or boundary note.
  • Verdict lane Synthesis against the path.

FalseHillary Clinton sold 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia.Slogans

What the record shows. False as stated: the ~20% figure was licensed ISR production capacity among few facilities, not national uranium stocks she personally sold; nine agencies and only the President could block.

Who says it: 2016 campaign slogans; viral posts

Points for
  • Uranium One held Wyoming ISR licenses
  • Rosatom affiliates gained control
  • State sat on CFIUS
Points against
  • Capacity ≠ reserves/‘America’s uranium’
  • Nine CFIUS members; presidential-only block
  • NRC export limits; no Russia re-transfer per FactCheck/NRC
  • She did not personally convey title
Sources
  1. NRC / FactCheck on ~20% licensed ISR capacity (2010)
  2. 2016 campaign slogan use — ‘sold 20%… funneled $145 million’
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  4. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
  5. CFIUS nine voting members listed
Read the full entry
UnprovenClinton was paid (via Foundation gifts / speech fees) to approve the Uranium One deal.Clinton role

What the record shows. Money and timing are documented; a completed purchase of approval is not. FactCheck and PolitiFact reject the paid-to-approve framing.

Who says it: Clinton Cash readers; Trump 2016

Points for
  • Telfer ~$2.35M on the deal calendar
  • $500k Moscow speech before CFIUS approval
  • State’s CFIUS seat
  • Disclosure failures
Points against
  • No evidence of influence on approvals per FactCheck
  • Fernandez: no intervention with him
  • Nine agencies cleared
  • Giustra’s largest gifts predate State/deal
Sources
  1. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  2. FactCheck: no evidence donations/speech influenced NRC or CFIUS approvals
  3. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  4. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  5. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
Read the full entry
FalseAs Secretary, Clinton had veto power and could have stopped the deal alone.Clinton role

What the record shows. FactCheck: CFIUS members can force a presidential decision by recommending a block; only the President suspends/prohibits. ‘Veto’ overclaims.

Who says it: Peter Schweizer on Fox News Sunday

Points for
  • Any member can recommend suspension/prohibition path
  • She was hawkish on some foreign acquisitions historically
Points against
  • Regulation: only President blocks
  • None of nine objected — no presidential referral fight
  • Schweizer later redefined ‘veto’ after FactCheck pushback
Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  2. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Read the full entry
FalseFrank Giustra’s $131M+ in Foundation gifts bought the 2010 Rosatom majority approval.Money & Foundation

What the record shows. False on timing: he sold his stake in 2007, before HRC was Secretary and before the 2010 majority deal. Early gifts cannot purchase 2010 equity upside he no longer held.

Who says it: $145M talking-point users

Points for
  • Enormous documented Giustra philanthropy
  • Personal friendship with Bill Clinton
  • UrAsia roots in the corporate story
Points against
  • Stake sold fall 2007 per PolitiFact/Snopes
  • Bulk gifts 2005–07 before State
  • Not a 2010 shareholder beneficiary
Sources
  1. Giustra stake sale timing (PolitiFact / Snopes / NYT context)
  2. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  3. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
  4. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
Read the full entry
Partly trueIan Telfer’s donations are smoking-gun proof of a quid pro quo.Money & Foundation

What the record shows. Best contemporaneous money exhibit and a real disclosure failure; still not proof his gifts moved CFIUS. Telfer denied deal talks.

Who says it: NYT readers; later prosecutors-of-public-opinion

Points for
  • ~$2.35M during Russian-control years
  • Incomplete public disclosure
  • Chairman of the company under review
Points against
  • No documented ask/vote trade
  • Fernandez denial of HRC intervention
  • FactCheck: no influence evidence
  • His stated charitable motive with Giustra
Sources
  1. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  2. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  3. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  4. FactCheck: no evidence donations/speech influenced NRC or CFIUS approvals
  5. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
Read the full entry
Partly trueNothing improper happened — Uranium One is a pure smear.The deal

What the record shows. Institutional clearance and no influence finding support a strong defense; calling disclosure failures and ugly timing ‘nothing’ overreaches.

Who says it: Maximal Clinton defenders

Points for
  • Nine-agency clearance
  • Fernandez quote
  • NRC export limits
  • FactCheck no-influence line
  • Giustra exit timing
Points against
  • Telfer gifts + disclosure mistakes
  • $500k Moscow speech timing
  • Appearance-of-conflict is substantive ethics
Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  2. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  3. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  4. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
Read the full entry
DiscreditedThe FBI informant proves the Clintons ran a uranium quid pro quo.Informant track

What the record shows. Democratic summaries of DOJ briefing and Campbell’s interview say he offered no such evidence; DOJ described credibility concerns. Maximalist bombshell claims collapsed in public.

Who says it: 2017–18 cable/Hill amplification

Points for
  • Real TENEX/Mikerin corruption case
  • Informant existed and was fought over
  • Russia sought influence generally
Points against
  • DOJ: no Clinton/Foundation/CFIUS allegations from him in their interactions
  • Credibility concerns; not used at trial
  • Dem interview summary: no quid evidence
Sources
  1. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  2. Reuters — Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale (Democrats)
  3. CNN — Democrats say Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons (8 Mar 2018)
  4. William D. Campbell identified as TENEX/Mikerin FBI confidential source
  5. DOJ — Vadim Mikerin sentencing / TENEX corruption case (2015)
Read the full entry
FalseThe deal let Russia ship U.S. uranium home for weapons or unrestricted use.The deal

What the record shows. NRC approved license transfers with no-export-to-Russia without separate authority; FactCheck cites NRC that no Uranium One-produced uranium was shipped to Russia and no re-transfer was authorized.

Who says it: National-security panic versions

Points for
  • Russian state ownership of a miner
  • Uranium is dual-use in the abstract
Points against
  • NRC export brake
  • 2015 NRC letter via FactCheck
  • Separate commercial fuel markets ≠ weapons pipeline shown
Sources
  1. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  2. NRC news release — Uranium One license transfers (24 Nov 2010)
  3. FactCheck update — later ~10% ISR capacity; low production share
Read the full entry
FalseHillary Clinton personally decided and approved the Uranium One sale.Clinton role

What the record shows. State was one of nine; Fernandez handled the seat and denies her intervention; only the President could block.

Who says it: Compressed social media claims

Points for
  • Secretary of State is a CFIUS member agency
  • Political accountability arguments
Points against
  • Nine members
  • Fernandez quote
  • Presidential-only prohibition authority
  • No public record of her personal vote management
Sources
  1. CFIUS nine voting members listed
  2. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
  3. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  4. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
Read the full entry
FalseNine investors funneled $145 million to the Foundation while the Russian deal happened.Money & Foundation

What the record shows. PolitiFact: bulk of the figure is Giustra money years earlier; several named investors’ 2010 stake status is unclear/absent.

Who says it: 2016 stump speech math

Points for
  • Multiple mining-circle donors exist
  • Total philanthropy figures are large
Points against
  • Timing mismatch for most dollars
  • Giustra exit
  • Not all nine verified as 2010 Uranium One holders
Sources
  1. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  2. Giustra stake sale timing (PolitiFact / Snopes / NYT context)
  3. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
Read the full entry
Partly trueThe only real issue is paperwork disclosure, not corruption risk.Money & Foundation

What the record shows. Disclosure failure is the cleanest documented fault; minimizing all conflict risk to ‘paperwork’ underplays why the MOU existed — but expanding paperwork into proven bribery overreaches the other way.

Who says it: Process-focused defenders / some ethics lawyers

Points for
  • Foundation admitted mistakes
  • No influence finding
  • Fernandez denial
Points against
  • Appearance problems are why disclosure was demanded
  • Speech fee optics
  • Strategic mineral + foreign government acquirer
Sources
  1. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  2. Obama White House ethics agreement / Foundation donor disclosure expectations
  3. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  4. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
Read the full entry
FalseThe Mikerin/TENEX conviction is the Uranium One bribery case against the Clintons.Informant track

What the record shows. False identity: Mikerin is a Rosatom-subsidiary corruption prosecution; it does not adjudicate CFIUS approval or Clinton Foundation quid.

Who says it: Mashed headlines

Points for
  • Same Russian nuclear state ecosystem
  • 2017 political packaging
Points against
  • Different facts, defendants, charges
  • FactCheck separates the cases
  • Dem/DOJ summaries reject Clinton bridge via Campbell
Sources
  1. DOJ — Vadim Mikerin sentencing / TENEX corruption case (2015)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
Read the full entry
UnprovenCFIUS confidentiality proves a cover-up of Clinton’s role.The deal

What the record shows. Confidentiality is statutory/default for the committee; secrecy alone does not prove a Clinton-directed cover-up. It does limit public falsification of soft influence.

Who says it: Suspicion-maximizers

Points for
  • Deliberations not public
  • Hard to disprove whispers
Points against
  • Confidentiality is general CFIUS law, not Uranium One-specific
  • No member objection meant no presidential public decision fight
  • Fernandez on-record
Sources
  1. U.S. Treasury — CFIUS process / presidential authority (guidelines & process explainers)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. Jose Fernandez quote via New York Times (2015)
Read the full entry
UnprovenGrassley’s April 2026 FBI releases prove Clinton Foundation crimes on Uranium One.Informant track

What the record shows. The letter and preliminary records keep questions alive; opening allegations are not final findings (as the thin nest already warned).

Who says it: 2026 social amplification

Points for
  • FBI opening papers cite undisclosed Telfer gifts
  • Oversight continues
Points against
  • Grassley asks what inquiries concluded — implying non-finality
  • No public adjudication cited here converting memos to convictions
Sources
  1. Grassley letter and released FBI records — Uranium One and foundation inquiries (27 Apr 2026)
  2. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  3. The Clinton Files — Uranium One short case (gateway)
Read the full entry
FalseUranium One is just another name for the Clinton email scandal.Memory

What the record shows. Related 2010s political era; different facts. Emails/Midyear live in the sibling guide; this spine is Rosatom/CFIUS/donations.

Who says it: Collapsed ‘Clinton scandal’ lists

Points for
  • Same principals
  • Overlapping Foundation politics
  • Same campaigns weaponized both
Points against
  • Different records and decisions
  • Separate AI Files full guides
  • CFIUS ≠ private server
Sources
  1. The AI Files — The Clintons: emails and the Foundation (full guide)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
Read the full entry

Media

Books, investigations, and later tellings

Clinton Cash, the NYT investigation, FactCheck explainers, and oversight packets that argue a thesis about Uranium One.

Books 1

Illustration for schweizer in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.book · 2015Clinton CashPeter SchweizerArgumentative book that seeded Uranium One–Foundation coverage; FactCheck contests the veto-power framing.
How it changes the story

Centers donor patterns as the explanatory key to State-era decisions.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropyrecast
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seatbreaks
  9. 9No member objectsbreaks
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood giftsrecast
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYTrecast
  14. 14Slogan vs capacitybreaks
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
Supports
2. Giustra philanthropy, 11. Telfer / Fernwood gifts, 13. Clinton Cash + NYT
Challenges
8. State’s CFIUS seat, 9. No member objects, 14. Slogan vs capacity
Whose account it centres
Schweizer’s pattern thesis
For its thesis to hold
Proximity must equal causation for the strongest claims to hold

Matching theories: Pay-to-play / quid pro quo Silent veto / she could have stopped it

Open

Follow up: official & authoritative 7

Illustration for press in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.investigation · 2015Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium DealJo Becker & Mike McIntire / New York TimesLongform documentation of donations, speech, and CFIUS structure without establishing quid pro quo.
How it changes the story

Moves Uranium One from book tour to front page with named dollar figures.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech feerecast
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood giftsrecast
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYTrecast
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribebreaks
Supports
7. Moscow speech fee, 11. Telfer / Fernwood gifts, 13. Clinton Cash + NYT
Challenges
16. Oversight without a settled bribe
Whose account it centres
Money trail and disclosure gap
For its thesis to hold
Readers must not confuse documentation of cash with proof of a traded vote

Matching theories: Ethics / appearance failure (without proven bribe) Pay-to-play / quid pro quo

Open
Illustration for press in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.explainer · 2017The Facts on Uranium OneEugene Kiely / FactCheck.orgStill the clearest public reconstruction of deal mechanics, capacity, and the influence evidence gap.
How it changes the story

Re-centers statute and NRC facts against slogan politics.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objectsrecast
  10. 10NRC transfer, no exportrecast
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacitybreaks
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled briberecast
Supports
9. No member objects, 10. NRC transfer, no export, 14. Slogan vs capacity, 16. Oversight without a settled bribe
Challenges
14. Slogan vs capacity
Whose account it centres
Institutional record
For its thesis to hold
Accepts that confidentiality limits certainty

Matching theories: Routine interagency clearance She sold America’s uranium

Open
Illustration for cfius in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.fact check · 2015No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium DealEugene Kiely / FactCheck.orgDirect rebuttal of Schweizer’s veto claim with Treasury/CFIUS rules.
How it changes the story

Separates member leverage from unilateral stop power.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objectsbreaks
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
Supports
9. No member objects
Challenges
9. No member objects
Whose account it centres
CFIUS regulation
For its thesis to hold
Schweizer’s ‘veto’ must be read as ordinary English to fail

Matching theories: Silent veto / she could have stopped it

Open
Illustration for trump in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.fact check · 2016Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium dealPolitiFactBreaks the $145M-while-the-deal-happened timeline; Giustra exit emphasized.
How it changes the story

Calendar discipline against stump math.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropybreaks
  3. 3Giustra exits the stockrecast
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacityrecast
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
Supports
3. Giustra exits the stock, 14. Slogan vs capacity
Challenges
2. Giustra philanthropy
Whose account it centres
Investor timing table
For its thesis to hold
Giustra exit holds

Matching theories: Giustra bought the deal years ahead She sold America’s uranium

Open
Illustration for capitol in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.oversight memo · 2018DOJ briefing / Campbell interview Democratic summaryHouse Oversight & Intelligence DemocratsPublishes DOJ credibility concerns and ‘no Clinton allegation’ account of the informant track.
How it changes the story

Undercuts informant-bombshell politics in public.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quidbreaks
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
Supports
15. Informant ≠ Clinton quid
Challenges
15. Informant ≠ Clinton quid
Whose account it centres
DOJ staff narrative
For its thesis to hold
Readers weigh partisan publication vs absent GOP full transcript

Matching theories: Informant bombshell covered up

Open
Illustration for grassley in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.oversight letter · 2026Grassley letter with FBI Uranium One / Foundation recordsSen. Chuck GrassleyKeeps preliminary investigation paper in public view; asks what inquiries concluded.
How it changes the story

Extends oversight memory into 2026 without itself being a conviction.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stock
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood giftsrecast
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacity
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribebreaks
Supports
16. Oversight without a settled bribe, 11. Telfer / Fernwood gifts
Challenges
16. Oversight without a settled bribe
Whose account it centres
Opening records and unanswered close-out questions
For its thesis to hold
Allegations in opening memos must not be read as findings

Matching theories: Ethics / appearance failure (without proven bribe) Pay-to-play / quid pro quo

Open
Illustration for uranium in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.fact check · updated explainerDid Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?SnopesAccessible demolition of the exchange-for-donations slogan package.
How it changes the story

Public mythbusting companion to FactCheck/PolitiFact.

  1. 1Canadian assets assembled
  2. 2Giustra philanthropy
  3. 3Giustra exits the stockrecast
  4. 4Secretary + ethics MOU
  5. 5ARMZ accumulates
  6. 6≥51% announced
  7. 7Moscow speech fee
  8. 8State’s CFIUS seat
  9. 9No member objects
  10. 10NRC transfer, no export
  11. 11Telfer / Fernwood gifts
  12. 12Full Rosatom ownership
  13. 13Clinton Cash + NYT
  14. 14Slogan vs capacitybreaks
  15. 15Informant ≠ Clinton quid
  16. 16Oversight without a settled bribe
Supports
3. Giustra exits the stock, 14. Slogan vs capacity
Challenges
14. Slogan vs capacity
Whose account it centres
Claim vs record
For its thesis to hold
Capacity literacy

Matching theories: She sold America’s uranium Giustra bought the deal years ahead

Open

Public memory

How memory of it changed

From 2015 Clinton Cash week through 2016 slogans to 2017–26 informant politics.

  1. Illustration for schweizer in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
    Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
    Apr–May 2015 Split into camps

    Clinton Cash week

    Dominant views
    • Critics Donations + Russia ownership = corruption story of the year.[1][2]
    • Defenders Book and coverage imply a quid they cannot show.[3][4]
    What drove it
    • NYT investigation + Schweizer rollout.[5][1]
    Clinton Cash Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal Clinton was paid (via Foundation gifts / speech fees) to approve the Uranium One deal. As Secretary, Clinton had veto power and could have stopped the deal alone.
  2. Illustration for trump in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
    Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
    2016 campaign Split into camps

    Slogan compression

    Dominant views
    • Trump campaign audiences She sold 20% of our uranium for Foundation cash.[6]
    • Fact-checkers Capacity + nine agencies + no influence evidence.[7][8]
    What drove it
    • Stump repetition beats footnotes.[6][9]
    Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…? Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia. Nine investors funneled $145 million to the Foundation while the Russian deal happened.
  3. Illustration for fbi in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
    Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
    Oct–Dec 2017 Split into camps

    Informant revival

    Dominant views
    • Hill/GOP oversight A silenced informant will connect TENEX crimes to Clinton approvals.[10][11]
    • FactCheck / institutionalists Real adjacent case; still no Clinton influence evidence.[8]
    What drove it
    • Solomon coverage + committee announcements.[10][8]
    The Facts on Uranium One The FBI informant proves the Clintons ran a uranium quid pro quo. The Mikerin/TENEX conviction is the Uranium One bribery case against the Clintons.
  4. Illustration for capitol in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
    Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
    2018 Converging

    Bombshell dud (in public)

    Dominant views
    • House Democrats Campbell gave no quid evidence; DOJ doubted him.[12][13]
    • Skeptical right Dem summary is a whitewash without a full transcript.[14]
    What drove it
    • Interview + DOJ briefing politics.[12][14]
    DOJ briefing / Campbell interview Democratic summary The FBI informant proves the Clintons ran a uranium quid pro quo.
  5. Illustration for grassley in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
    Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
    2026 Split into camps

    Records without a close

    Dominant views
    • Oversight hawks Released FBI papers keep the Foundation/uranium inquiry alive.[15]
    • Guide’s record lane Opening allegations still are not findings.[15][16]
    What drove it
    • Grassley April 2026 letter.[15]
    Grassley letter with FBI Uranium One / Foundation records Grassley’s April 2026 FBI releases prove Clinton Foundation crimes on Uranium One.
Sources and polls
  1. Peter Schweizer — Clinton Cash (2015)
  2. 2015 GOP reactions (Romney ‘looks like bribery’; Paul investigation call) via FactCheck
  3. Brian Fallon / Clinton campaign denial of evidence (via NYT/NPR 2015)
  4. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  5. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  6. 2016 campaign slogan use — ‘sold 20%… funneled $145 million’
  7. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  8. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  9. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
  10. The Hill — FBI informant / Russia nuclear corruption coverage (Oct 2017, John Solomon et al.)
  11. Sen. Chuck Grassley — letters on Uranium One / informant (Oct 2017)
  12. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  13. Reuters — Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale (Democrats)
  14. CNN — Democrats say Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons (8 Mar 2018)
  15. Grassley letter and released FBI records — Uranium One and foundation inquiries (27 Apr 2026)
  16. The Clinton Files — Uranium One short case (gateway)

Lasting impact

How it changed us

CFIUS literacy, Foundation disclosure fights, and the template for Russia–Clinton mashups.

Laws & institutions 2

How Uranium One taught a mass audience the word CFIUS — and tested Foundation disclosure politics.

Illustration for cfius in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
2015–17In force

CFIUS entered cable vocabulary

A once-obscure investment screen became a household accusation word.

The evidence it changed
  • FactCheck explainers had to teach nine members and presidential-only block authority to a mass audience.[1][2][3]
Clinton Cash week Slogan compression
Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
2015One-case law

Foundation disclosure as campaign weapon

Incomplete donor transparency became as politically potent as any CFIUS memo.

The evidence it changed
  • Foundation ‘mistakes’ admission followed NYT’s Telfer reconstruction.[4][5][6]
Clinton Cash week The only real issue is paperwork disclosure, not corruption risk.

People it inspired 2

Authors, overseers, and slogan-makers who made the deal a durable political verb.

Illustration for schweizer in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
2015Partly true

Schweizer’s pattern method

Clinton Cash showed opposition research could set the Times’s table — and still overclaim a veto.

The evidence it changed
  • NYT built on his reporting; FactCheck knocked the veto line.[7][5][1]
Clinton Cash week
Illustration for trump in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
2016False

‘Sold 20%’ as durable meme

A capacity fraction became a permanent online ‘factoid’ resistant to corrections.

The evidence it changed
  • PolitiFact/FactCheck/Snopes repeatedly unpack the same compression.[8][9][10][2]
Slogan compression Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia.

Things we now take for granted 3

Habits of argument the episode normalized.

Illustration for fbi in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
2017

Adjacent Russian cases get mashed

Before

TENEX corruption and CFIUS ownership were separable files.

After

Cable segments treat Mikerin/Campbell as if they were the CFIUS verdict.

The evidence it changed
  • FactCheck and Dem/DOJ summaries spend 2017–18 untangling the mashup.[2][11][12]
Informant revival Bombshell dud (in public)
Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
2015–26

Appearance can outrun proof

Before

Defenders demanded a smoking-gun email.

After

Critics treat ugly timing as sufficient political proof even when fact-checkers withhold the quid.

The evidence it changed
  • Guide’s own split: money documented, influence unproven — still politically decisive for many.[13][14][15]
Clinton Cash week Records without a close Clinton was paid (via Foundation gifts / speech fees) to approve the Uranium One deal.
Illustration for couple in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded.
2026

Sibling-guide discipline

Before

Hub short cases blurred Foundation, email, and uranium into one sludge page.

After

Full guides split spines and cross-link — Uranium One mechanics here; Midyear next door.

The evidence it changed
  • Hub architecture + emails-foundation cross-link rule in this build.[16][17][18]
Records without a close
Sources for this section
  1. FactCheck.org — No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal (28 Apr 2015)
  2. FactCheck.org — The Facts on Uranium One (26 Oct 2017, upd. 1 Nov 2017)
  3. CFIUS nine voting members listed
  4. Clinton Foundation acknowledgment of disclosure mistakes (2015, via FactCheck/NYT)
  5. New York Times — Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Jo Becker & Mike McIntire, 23 Apr 2015)
  6. Obama White House ethics agreement / Foundation donor disclosure expectations
  7. Peter Schweizer — Clinton Cash (2015)
  8. 2016 campaign slogan use — ‘sold 20%… funneled $145 million’
  9. PolitiFact — Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal (30 Jun 2016)
  10. Snopes — Did Hillary Clinton Give 20% of United States’ Uranium to Russia…?
  11. House Oversight/Intelligence Democrats — memo on Campbell informant briefing (2018)
  12. DOJ — Vadim Mikerin sentencing / TENEX corruption case (2015)
  13. FactCheck: no evidence donations/speech influenced NRC or CFIUS approvals
  14. Ian Telfer / Fernwood Foundation donations (~$2.35M)
  15. Bill Clinton $500,000 Moscow speech — Renaissance Capital (29 Jun 2010)
  16. The AI Files — The Clintons: emails and the Foundation (full guide)
  17. The Clinton Files hub
  18. The Clinton Files — Uranium One short case (gateway)

How this guide works

Sources and method

This page is an AI-generated illustrated guide to Uranium One — Rosatom’s acquisition of a Canadian miner with U.S. licenses, CFIUS/NRC approvals, and the Clinton Foundation donation claims that followed. Every factual line points to a source. Ratings are badges, not the spine.

Primary anchors: FactCheck.org (2015 veto piece; 2017 Facts on Uranium One); New York Times Becker/McIntire (23 Apr 2015); PolitiFact and Snopes on slogan claims; Treasury/CFIUS process materials; NRC license-transfer record as summarized in those sources; DOJ TENEX/Mikerin case; 2017–18 Grassley/House Oversight materials and Democratic DOJ-briefing summaries; Grassley April 2026 FBI-records letter.

Hard stop: this is not a Ukraine-war guide. Private email, Midyear Exam, Comey’s letters, the Podesta hacks, and Durham reviews are cross-linked in the emails-and-Foundation sibling guide — not rebuilt here.

Never cite Grokipedia. Pictures are freely licensed or U.S. government works, re-encoded with EXIF stripped.

The Record (sourced facts) is kept visually separate from camp framings in Theories. Documented donations and an unproven quid pro quo can both be true statements about different questions.

By the numbers
  • 50 entries in 6 eras
  • 46 distinct sources cited
  • 32 dated events
  • 15 claims checked
  • 7 theories opened up
  • 8 books, films and follow-ups
  • 16 steps on the critical path
  • 7 open questions
  • 7 lasting changes
  • 38 freely licensed pictures

Pictures & licenses

Picture credits

Every picture is public domain or freely licensed, from Wikimedia Commons. Files are stored on this site with their metadata removed; each credit links to the original.

Illustration for barrasso in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for bill in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for campbell in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for capitol in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for cfius in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for couple in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for cummings in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for docs in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for doj in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for fallon in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for fbi in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for fernandez in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for foundation in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for giustra in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for grassley in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for hero in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for hillary in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for kazakhstan in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for mikerin in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for mining in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for moscow in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for nrc in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for nunes in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for obama in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for path in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for paul in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for press in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for romney in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for rosatom in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for schiff in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for schweizer in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for state in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for telfer in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for toensing in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for trump in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for uranium in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for web in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original
Illustration for wyoming in the Uranium One guide (re-encoded from site archive / freely licensed pool).
Site archive reuse; see sibling clinton-emails-foundation / U.S. government / Wikimedia-sourced pool. EXIF stripped by re-encode. · Freely licensed or U.S. government work via AI Files image pool; re-encoded. · original

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesClintons shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputes