COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The Ukraine call: Trump, Giuliani and the Bidens

“Do us a favor, though”, the frozen aid and the first impeachment

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Biden Family hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

“Do us a favor, though”

What Trump asked, and what happened.

On 25 July 2019 Volodymyr Zelensky thanked Trump for U.S. support and mentioned Javelin missiles. Trump replied: “I would like you to do us a favor though.” He asked about the CrowdStrike server theory and then said: “The other thing, there’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it . . . It sounds horrible to me.” [1]

At the time, $391 million in military and security aid for Ukraine had been frozen on the President’s orders. In January 2020 the GAO found the hold violated the Impoundment Control Act. The House impeached Trump in December 2019; the Senate acquitted him on 5 February 2020. Only one Republican, Mitt Romney, voted to convict, on abuse of power. [2][3]

What we can’t tell you. Whether Trump’s purpose was corruption-fighting or political help is the question the impeachment fought over; this file records what was said and decided.

The sources

  1. White House, 25 September 2019: memorandum of telephone conversation with President Zelensky, 25 July 2019 ↗

    The rough transcript in which Trump asks Zelensky to “look into” Biden’s role in the prosecutor’s firing.

  2. Government Accountability Office, 16 January 2020: Office of Management and Budget—Withholding of Ukraine Security Assistance (B-331564) ↗

    Finds the hold on Ukraine aid violated the Impoundment Control Act. Blocks scripted fetches; confirmed by search.

  3. U.S. Senate floor log, 5 February 2020: verdict in the first Trump impeachment trial ↗

    The record of the acquittal votes.

Giuliani’s Ukraine dossier

Where the 2019 Biden material came from.

Through 2019 Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, met Ukrainian figures who offered stories about the Bidens, including Shokin and his successor Yuriy Lutsenko. Lutsenko later said he had no evidence of wrongdoing by the Bidens under Ukrainian law. [1][4]

One of Giuliani’s sources, the Ukrainian lawmaker Andrii Derkach, released edited recordings of Biden’s calls with Poroshenko in 2020. In September 2020 the Treasury Department, under Trump, sanctioned him, saying he had “been an active Russian agent for over a decade.” And at the end of 2019, as Burisma became an issue in the U.S. election, Russian military intelligence ran a phishing campaign against the company, according to the security firm Area 1. What, if anything, it stole has never been published. [2][3]

What we can’t tell you. The Area 1 attribution is a private firm’s; no U.S. government finding about the Burisma hack has been published.

The sources

  1. Senate Republican staff report: Hunter Biden, Burisma and corruption, September 2020 ↗

    Republican majority report compiling documents and testimony; its characterizations are investigators’ conclusions, not criminal judgments. This guide uses its documented ethics warnings without adopting every allegation.

  2. U.S. Treasury, 10 September 2020: Treasury sanctions Russia-linked election interference actors ↗

    Sanctions Andrii Derkach, who released edited Biden–Poroshenko call recordings, as “an active Russian agent for over a decade.”

  3. CNN, 13 January 2020: Russians hacked Burisma, cybersecurity firm says ↗

    Area 1 Security’s report of a GRU phishing campaign against Burisma in late 2019.

  4. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 2019: Why was Ukraine’s top prosecutor fired? Viktor Shokin’s dismissal explained ↗

    Lays out both sides, with Ukrainian prosecutors and anti-corruption activists on the state of the Burisma cases.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 126 rated claims ↗

← The Biden Family hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesBiden shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesBiden.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.