The day

Why the fighters did not stop the planes

NORAD, the FAA, the “stand-down” theory and the military’s false accounts

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Documented

No evidence of a stand-down order has surfaced. The military had nine minutes’ notice of the first hijacking and essentially none of the others. It is documented, though, that NORAD and FAA officials gave the public and the Commission an inaccurate account of the morning, and that Commission members suspected deliberate deception.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

6 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

DOCUMENTED The morning of 11 September

“The military had only nine minutes’ warning of the first hijacking.”

Boston Center called NEADS at 8:37:52, nine minutes before American 11 hit; that was the most notice it had of any of the four.

Who says it: 9/11 Commission.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

DOCUMENTED The morning of 11 September

“NORAD officials gave the Commission a false account of the morning.”

Their May 2003 testimony on United 93 and American 77 was wrong, made the military look ready, and some commissioners suspected deliberate deception.

Who says it: 9/11 Commission and staff.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

DOCUMENTED The morning of 11 September

“A spy agency had a drill that morning about a plane hitting its building.”

The National Reconnaissance Office planned an exercise simulating a small corporate jet crashing into one of its buildings. No plane was involved; it was cancelled when the real attacks began.

Who says it: AP, NRO.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

DOCUMENTED The morning of 11 September

“Fighters chased a plane that had already crashed.”

At 9:21 the FAA wrongly reported American 11 still airborne; the Langley fighters were scrambled and sent east over the Atlantic.

Who says it: 9/11 Commission.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

FALSE The morning of 11 September

“NORAD was ordered to stand down.”

No order has surfaced. The tapes show officers scrambling for information the FAA gave them late, wrong or not at all.

Who says it: Loose Change and others.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

FALSE The morning of 11 September

“War games that morning were used to keep the fighters away.”

Vigilant Guardian was real and briefly caused confusion, but the Commission found it took about 30 seconds to switch over and that extra staff on duty helped.

Who says it: Theorists.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 162 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 1: “We Have Some Planes” ↗

    The minute-by-minute account of the four flights and of the FAA and NORAD response, including the 10:03:11 crash time of United 93 and when the shootdown order reached the pilots.

  2. 9/11 Commission staff statement 17: Improvising a Homeland Defense ↗

    Staff account of the FAA and NORAD response on the day, which found earlier official timelines wrong.

  3. Vanity Fair, August 2006: “9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,” by Michael Bronner ↗

    Built on the NEADS tapes; shows how little the military knew and when.

  4. Democracy Now!, 11 September 2006: Loose Change filmmakers debate Popular Mechanics ↗

    A long, even-handed debate between the two sides.

  5. Washington Post, 2 August 2006: “9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon,” by Dan Eggen ↗

    Commission members and staff suspected Pentagon and FAA officials misled them about the military response and referred the matter to the inspectors general. Confirmed by search; the site blocks scripted fetches.

  6. 9/11 Commission Report: endnotes ↗

    The notes carry many of the report’s most specific findings, including the put-options trading, the phone-call records and the Vigilant Guardian exercise.

  7. USA Today (Associated Press), 22 August 2002: the National Reconnaissance Office’s plane-crash drill on 11 September ↗

    The NRO had planned a simulated accidental crash of a small jet into one of its buildings; it was cancelled when the real attacks began.

← The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFiles911 shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFiles911.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.