The day

Flight 93

The revolt, the crash near Shanksville, and the theory that it was shot down

The Wall of Names at Flight 93 National Memorial marks the aircraft’s final approach.
NPS / C. Claycomb · Source & image context ↗

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Documented

The cockpit recorder and flight data show the passenger assault and the hijacker pilot deliberately crashing the plane. The military did not know Flight 93 had been hijacked until after it crashed, and the shootdown order did not reach the pilots in time. No evidence supports the shootdown theory.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

DOCUMENTED The morning of 11 September

“The passengers on Flight 93 fought back.”

The cockpit recorder captured the assault from 9:57, and the hijackers crashed the plane rather than lose control of it.

Who says it: 9/11 Commission.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

FALSE The morning of 11 September

“Flight 93 was shot down.”

The military learned of the hijacking after the crash; the shootdown authority reached NORAD at 10:31; the recorders show a deliberate dive ending at 10:03:11.

Who says it: Online theorists.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

FALSE The morning of 11 September

“There was no plane wreckage at Shanksville.”

The plane buried itself in soft ground at more than 560 mph; both recorders, engine parts, a fuselage section, passports and remains were recovered.

Who says it: Skeptics.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 162 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 1: “We Have Some Planes” ↗

    The minute-by-minute account of the four flights and of the FAA and NORAD response, including the 10:03:11 crash time of United 93 and when the shootdown order reached the pilots.

  2. National Park Service: Flight 93 frequently asked questions ↗

    The memorial’s answers on the crash, the recovery and the passengers.

  3. FBI video: investigation of Flight 93 ↗

    FBI agents and the county coroner describe the Shanksville recovery.

  4. U.S. District Court (E.D. Va.): United States v. Moussaoui, prosecution trial exhibits ↗

    The 2006 trial exhibits, including the cockpit voice recording transcript and the phone-call records from the four flights.

  5. ABC News, November 2022: Dramatic details released on Bush and Cheney dealing with 9/11 attacks ↗

    News account of the released memorandum.

  6. National Park Service: Flight 93 flight data recorder ↗

    What the recovered recorder shows of the final minutes.

← The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFiles911 shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFiles911.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.