COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

No crater under the lander

Where is the blast pit, and why is there no dust on the footpads?

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Moon File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

The strongest version of this theory

A rocket landing should leave a hole.

The descent engine could produce about 10,000 pounds of thrust. On Earth, rocket launches blast deep scars into the ground. A landing on powdery soil should dig a crater and cover the footpads in dust. [1]

The sources

  1. Apollo 11: contemporary public-affairs mission report ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

What really happened under the engine

Low thrust, vacuum and no air to carry dust.

By touchdown the engine was throttled down to a fraction of its maximum, enough only to hold up a lander that weighed one-sixth as much as on Earth. In a vacuum the exhaust spreads out immediately, so its pressure on the ground is low. Armstrong described the result: no crater, but radial streaks where the soil had been blown away. [1]

Dust was a real problem. Apollo 12’s crew could barely see the ground through it during landing. [2] Without air, the dust flew outward in straight lines and fell, rather than billowing and settling on the footpads.

The engine was also cut off at, or just after, first contact. NASA is still testing how plumes and soil interact because Artemis landers are far bigger. [3]

What we can’t tell you. No exact excavation depth is claimed.

The sources

  1. Apollo 11: contemporary public-affairs mission report ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  2. NASA: Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During Apollo, 2005 report ↗

    NASA2005 synthesis of Apollo experience, including descent erosion, visibility and contamination. Official NTRS PDF HTTP200 verified; older ALSJ and SMA mirrors failed in this check.

  3. NASA: Moon Mission Plume-Surface Interaction Tests, updated August 2026 ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

2 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 111 rated claims ↗

← The Moon File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesMoon shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesMoon.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.