WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING / 111 CLAIMS RATED
The claims board
Each claim is a proposition people repeat about the Apollo Moon landings, the hoax theory and the people involved, rated against the public record as of 23 October 2026. Each claim is stated as its believers would put it and rated on evidence alone. Where a doubter’s point is true, it is rated true. A starting point for research: new evidence may change these ratings. Grouped by rating, then topic.
← Interactive, filterable board · All Moon case files
- DOCUMENTED — Shown by primary records, mission data, physical samples, independent measurements or official findings. The claim as stated holds up.
- PARTLY TRUE — A real fact sits inside the claim, but the popular version adds, omits or overstates something material.
- DISPUTED — Credible evidence points in more than one direction, or informed people weigh the record differently.
- UNPROVEN — Not established by any public record available on 23 October 2026. It may be believed; it is not shown. Not the same as false.
- FALSE — Contradicted by mission records, physics, independent measurements, samples or other primary evidence.
DOCUMENTED · 52
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Sputnik scared Americans into the space race.”
The 4 October 1957 launch raised fears about Soviet missiles and pushed the US into a crash program.
Who says it: Historians.
Evidence for the claim
- NASA was founded the next year.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Dawn of the Space Age ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Kennedy set the goal of landing on the Moon before 1970.”
He asked Congress on 25 May 1961.
Who says it: The speech record.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: U.S. House archive: Kennedy’s May 25, 1961 message ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Kennedy proposed a joint Moon mission with the Soviets.”
He raised it at the UN in September 1963.
Who says it: The speech record.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: JFK Library archive: UN General Assembly speech, September 20, 1963 ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Former Nazi engineers built Apollo’s rocket.”
Wernher von Braun and other Operation Paperclip engineers led the Saturn V work.
Who says it: Historians.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Smithsonian NASM: Project Paperclip and American rocketry after World War II ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“The Saturn V grew out of missile programs.”
Its lineage runs through the Army’s Redstone and Jupiter work.
Who says it: NASA history.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA Science: Saturn V rocket ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Apollo cost about $25 billion.”
That is the usual figure in 1960s–70s dollars.
Who says it: NASA budget records.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
- Adjusted figures vary by method.
Sources: NASA retrospective: Apollo’s legacy and $25.4 billion historical cost ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Apollo helped create the microchip industry.”
NASA and Minuteman orders were early, big buyers of integrated circuits.
Who says it: Historians.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Smithsonian NASM: Apollo Guidance Computer and the first silicon chips ↗ · Computer History Museum: first planar integrated circuit ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Robots landed on the Moon before people did.”
Ranger, Surveyor and Lunar Orbiter mapped and tested the surface.
Who says it: NASA records.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Lunar Ranger and Surveyor programs ↗ · NASA: Surveyor 1 makes a soft landing ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Gemini rehearsed the skills needed for the Moon.”
Rendezvous, docking and spacewalks were practised in Earth orbit.
Who says it: NASA records.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Project Gemini, Apollo’s training ground ↗ · NASA: Gemini XII masters the challenges of spacewalks ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Apollo 10 flew everything but the landing.”
Its lander descended to about 9 miles above the surface.
Who says it: NASA records.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Apollo 10 mission details ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Grissom hung a lemon on the Apollo 1 simulator.”
Accounts say he did, to protest its problems.
Who says it: Crew and family accounts.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Apollo 1 ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“An inspector, Thomas Baron, warned of shoddy work before the fire.”
He testified to Congress and died days later in a car crash. His warnings were real; no link to the crash was shown.
Who says it: Congressional records.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
- His death was ruled an accident.
Sources: NASA History: Thomas Baron (excerpt, Chariots for Apollo, SP-4205) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“The fire led to a redesigned spacecraft.”
NASA changed the hatch, materials and launch-pad atmosphere.
Who says it: NASA review board.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Robert Seamans statement during Apollo 204 review (February 25, 1967) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Apollo 11 landed on 20 July 1969.”
Armstrong and Aldrin landed in the Sea of Tranquility.
Who says it: NASA mission report.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo 11 mission report (November 1969) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Apollo 13 set the distance record for a crew.”
It held until Artemis II in April 2026.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Apollo 13 mission page ↗ · NASA: NASA welcomes record-setting Artemis II moonfarers back to Earth (10 April 2026) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Why and how we went
“Twelve men walked on the Moon over six landings.”
Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Who says it: NASA records.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo by the Numbers, NASA SP-4029 ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The photos
“The flag had a horizontal rod.”
NASA added a crossbar to hold it out in vacuum.
Who says it: NASA records.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA NTRS: Where No Flag Has Gone Before ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The photos
“Apollo 16 photographed stars.”
A UV camera on the surface imaged stars and Earth.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA NTRS: Apollo16 ultraviolet astronomical camera observations ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Physics & the footage
“A huge solar storm struck between Apollo 16 and 17.”
On 4 August 1972; a surface crew could have received about 600 rem to the skin.
Who says it: ALSJ, NCRP.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo Lunar Surface Journal: Radiation Environment and dosimeter readings ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Physics & the footage
“A hammer and a feather fell together on the Moon.”
David Scott did it live on Apollo 15.
Who says it: NASA video.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Apollo 15 hammer–feather drop ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Physics & the footage
“MythBusters tested astronaut movement at one-sixth gravity.”
They flew Zero-G parabolas after a harness rig proved inadequate.
Who says it: collectSPACE.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: collectSPACE: MythBusters take on the Moon landing hoax (August 2008) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Physics & the footage
“Apollo 12’s TV camera failed.”
Bean pointed it at the sun.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Apollo 12 Makes a Pinpoint Landing on the Moon ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“Apollo 12 brought back part of Surveyor 3.”
The crew removed its camera, now at the Smithsonian.
Who says it: JPL.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA JPL: Surveyor 3 Camera Returned from the Moon ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“An orbiter has photographed the landing sites.”
LRO shows descent stages, tracks and equipment.
Who says it: NASA LROC.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: LRO images offer sharper views of Apollo 12, 14 and 17 sites (NASA SVS, 2011) ↗ · LRO explores the Apollo 11 landing site (NASA, 2017) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“India’s Chandrayaan imaged Apollo traces.”
Its instruments imaged the Apollo 15 site area.
Who says it: ISRO.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: ISRO science results from Chandrayaan-2: OHRC instrument and anthropogenic sites ↗ · ISRO Chandrayaan-2 science instruments ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“Japan’s Kaguya found the Apollo 15 blast zone.”
JAXA reported the halo from the descent engine.
Who says it: JAXA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: JAXA: Kaguya finds Apollo 15 exhaust halo and matching terrain (May 20, 2008; Japanese original) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“South Korea’s Danuri photographed Apollo sites.”
It imaged the Apollo 11 and 17 areas.
Who says it: KARI via Dong-A.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Dong-A Science: Danuri photographs the Apollo landing sites (26 September 2023) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“Apollo left laser reflectors still used today.”
Observatories bounce lasers off them.
Who says it: Laser ranging papers.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Battat and colleagues: Fifteen years of millimeter accuracy lunar laser ranging with APOLLO (2023) ↗ · Science: Laser beam directed at the lunar retro-reflector array, observations of the first returns (1969) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“Soviet rovers also carry reflectors.”
Lunokhod 1 and 2 had French-built reflectors.
Who says it: Laser ranging records.
Evidence for the claim
- Robots can place reflectors.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Murphy and colleagues: Laser ranging to the lost Lunokhod 1 reflector (2010) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“Apollo samples still produce new science.”
Recent papers on water and oxygen use them.
Who says it: Peer-reviewed papers.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Saal and colleagues: Volatile content of lunar volcanic glasses and water in the lunar interior (Nature, 2008) ↗ · Ireland and colleagues: Isotopic enhancements from solar wind particles in lunar regolith (Nature, 2006) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“A Dutch “Moon rock” was petrified wood.”
The Rijksmuseum’s gift to Willem Drees was tested in 2009.
Who says it: NBC, Rijksmuseum.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: AP via NBC News: “Moon rock” in museum is just petrified wood (27 August 2009) ↗ · Rijksmuseum: Moon rock received by Drees from the American ambassador (object NG-1991-4-25) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“A British observatory tracked Apollo 11.”
Jodrell Bank recorded it and Luna 15.
Who says it: Jodrell Bank.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: The Moon landing and Jodrell Bank (2024 institutional history) ↗ · Jodrell Bank: Recordings of Luna 15’s attempt to beat Apollo 11 (3 July 2009) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“An Australian dish carried most of the moonwalk TV.”
Parkes took over from Honeysuckle Creek about eight minutes in.
Who says it: CSIRO.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: CSIRO: Murriyang, the Parkes radio telescope, and the Apollo 11 Moon landing ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“A Soviet probe was at the Moon during Apollo 11.”
Luna 15 crashed on 21 July after 52 orbits.
Who says it: NASA, Jodrell Bank.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Jodrell Bank: Recordings of Luna 15’s attempt to beat Apollo 11 (3 July 2009) ↗ · NASA NSSDC: Impact sites of lunar spacecraft ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Independent evidence
“Soviet officials congratulated the Apollo crews.”
Soviet leaders hosted American astronauts.
Who says it: NASA history.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: 50 years ago, the U.S. and Soviet Union sign a space cooperation agreement ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Tapes & records
“NASA lost the original Apollo 11 tapes.”
They were very likely erased and reused in a tape shortage.
Who says it: NASA 2009 report.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: collectSPACE: “Lost tapes” lost for good, NASA releases restored footage (16 July 2009) ↗ · NASA: Apollo 11 Telemetry Data Recordings, final report ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Tapes & records
“Apollo 11 tapes sold at auction for $1.8 million.”
Sotheby’s sold tapes bought at a 1976 surplus auction.
Who says it: CNBC.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: CNBC: Apollo 11 Moon landing tapes sell at Sotheby’s for $1.8 million (20 July 2019) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Tapes & records
“NASA restored the Apollo 11 broadcast.”
Using Sydney, CBS and JSC copies.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Releases Restored Apollo 11 Moonwalk Video ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Tapes & records
“Three Moon missions were cancelled.”
Apollo 20 in January 1970; 18 and 19 in September.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Apollo 18 through 20, the cancelled missions ↗ · NASA: Apollo 13 preparation and cancellation of Apollo 20 ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The people
“Kaysing sued Jim Lovell and lost.”
A judge threw out the case.
Who says it: The Independent.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: The Independent: Bill Kaysing obituary (2005) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The people
“Kaysing started the hoax theory.”
His 1974–76 self-published work is the usual starting point.
Who says it: Historians.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Smithsonian / Roger Launius: Yes, the US Landed Humans on the Moon ↗ · University of Manchester / Peter Knight: How moon landing conspiracy theories began ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The people
“NASA rebutted the Fox special.”
It posted responses and a teachers’ guide.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA Marshall “Liftoff” archive: The Great Moon Hoax (30 March 2001; archived) ↗ · NASA NTRS: Did We Really Land on the Moon? Suggestions for Science Teachers ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The people
“Buzz Aldrin punched Bart Sibrel.”
Video shows one punch; no charges were filed.
Who says it: LA Times.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Los Angeles Times: No charges for Aldrin in punch (21 September 2002) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The people
“Sibrel provoked the punch.”
The DA’s office said he arranged to surprise Aldrin and called him a liar.
Who says it: LA Times.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Los Angeles Times: No charges for Aldrin in punch (21 September 2002) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The people
“2001: A Space Odyssey came out before Apollo 11.”
In April 1968.
Who says it: NASA history.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA history: 1968 Welcomed 2001 ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The people
“NASA’s acting chief answered Kardashian.”
Sean Duffy wrote: “Yes, we’ve been to the Moon before... 6 times!”
Who says it: BBC.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: BBC: NASA responds after Kim Kardashian says Moon landing was fake (3 November 2025) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED The strange stuff
“Apollo 11 saw an unidentified light.”
Aldrin reported a light moving alongside them.
Who says it: Aldrin.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Business Insider: Buzz Aldrin’s Apollo 11 “UFO” encounter (July 2014) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Polls, Artemis & now
“About 6% of Americans think the landing was staged.”
Gallup 1999 and later polls agree.
Who says it: Gallup, AP.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Gallup: Landing a Man on the Moon, the public’s view (July 1999) ↗ · AP: Polls show 5–6% of Americans believe the Moon landing was faked (July 2019) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Polls, Artemis & now
“Young people doubt the landings more.”
YouGov found more doubt among the under-50s.
Who says it: YouGov.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: YouGov, Kathy Frankovic: 50 years later, was the Moon landing worth it? (19 July 2019) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Polls, Artemis & now
“Artemis II flew around the Moon.”
Four astronauts flew 252,756 miles from Earth.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: NASA welcomes record-setting Artemis II moonfarers back to Earth (10 April 2026) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Polls, Artemis & now
“Artemis III will not land.”
It is now a 2027 Earth-orbit test; Artemis IV is to land in 2028.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: NASA adds mission to Artemis lunar program, updates architecture (27 February 2026) ↗ · NASA: NASA marches toward Artemis III mission in 2027, names crew members (9 June 2026) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DOCUMENTED Polls, Artemis & now
“NASA cancelled its ice-hunting rover.”
VIPER was cancelled in July 2024.
Who says it: NASA.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: NASA ends VIPER project, continues Moon exploration (July 2024) ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE · 9
PARTLY TRUE Why and how we went
“Apollo was really a military program.”
NASA was set up as a civilian agency, but Cold War security and prestige drove the funding.
Who says it: Critics of the space race.
Evidence for the claim
- Rockets and missiles shared roots.
Evidence against / limits
- NASA was legally civilian.
Sources: National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, original text ↗ · NASA: The National Aeronautics and Space Act creates NASA ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE Why and how we went
“Armstrong said “one small step for man”.”
He said he meant “a man”; the article is hard to hear.
Who says it: ALSJ.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo Lunar Surface Journal: Apollo 11, One Small Step ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE The photos
“The flags are still standing.”
LRO images show flag shadows at later sites; Aldrin saw Apollo 11’s blown over at liftoff.
Who says it: LROC team.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
- Colors are likely bleached.
Sources: NASA history: One Small Step, One Giant Leap ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE Independent evidence
“The LRO photos are NASA, so they prove nothing.”
LRO is NASA’s, but India and others have imaged sites too.
Who says it: Skeptics.
Evidence against / limits
- Other nations’ data agree.
Sources: ISRO science results from Chandrayaan-2: OHRC instrument and anthropogenic sites ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE Independent evidence
“China has confirmed the Apollo hardware.”
Chang’e-2’s 7 m images cannot resolve descent stages.
Who says it: Viral posts.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: LRO images offer sharper views of Apollo 12, 14 and 17 sites (NASA SVS, 2011) ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE Independent evidence
“Von Braun went to Antarctica to collect Moon rocks.”
He visited in 1967 but to study conditions, before any lunar meteorite was known.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence against / limits
- No lunar meteorite was known.
Sources: New York Times: U.S. space experts to study Antarctica for lunar lessons (4 January 1967) ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE Tapes & records
“Don Pettit said “we destroyed that technology”.”
He did, about rebuilding Moon capability.
Who says it: IBT.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: IBTimes UK: Don Pettit, next logical step is to go back to the Moon (2016) ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE The people
“Kaysing was a Rocketdyne insider.”
He led technical publications and left in the early 1960s.
Who says it: Kaysing.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: The Independent: Bill Kaysing obituary (2005) ↗
Read the full file ↗
PARTLY TRUE The people
“About 15 million watched the Fox special.”
That was Fox’s own figure.
Who says it: Fox, via Slate.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Slate: Fox’s 2001 special “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?” (July 2019) ↗
Read the full file ↗
DISPUTED · 1
DISPUTED The strange stuff
“Bacteria survived on the Moon on Surveyor 3.”
The 1970 finding is now often blamed on contamination after return.
Who says it: Later NASA review.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Surveyor 3 returned material: surface organics analysis (1972) ↗
Read the full file ↗
UNPROVEN · 2
UNPROVEN Why and how we went
“Gus Grissom was murdered to silence him.”
No evidence supports it. The fire was traced to a spark in a pure-oxygen cabin.
Who says it: Grissom’s son Scott and conspiracy writers.
Evidence for the claim
- Grissom criticized the spacecraft.
Evidence against / limits
- Investigators found wiring and oxygen at fault.
Sources: NASA: Apollo 1 ↗ · Robert Seamans statement during Apollo 204 review (February 25, 1967) ↗
Read the full file ↗
UNPROVEN The people
“Doubt rose to 20% after the Fox special.”
We found no published poll behind it.
Who says it: Fox officials.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Slate: Fox’s 2001 special “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?” (July 2019) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE · 47
FALSE Why and how we went
“NASA invented Velcro, Teflon and Tang.”
None was invented by NASA, though some were used in space.
Who says it: Popular lore.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
- NASA itself corrects this.
Sources: NASA Spinoff: inventions NASA did and did not create ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Why and how we went
“Apollo’s computer was too weak to reach the Moon.”
The guidance computer ran at about 2 MHz and did a narrow job well, backed by ground computers.
Who says it: Hoax videos.
Evidence for the claim
- A phone is far more powerful.
Evidence against / limits
- Ground computers did the heavy work.
Sources: NASA: Computers in Spaceflight, Apollo hardware decisions ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Why and how we went
“Apollo 13’s accident was staged for ratings.”
A damaged oxygen tank exploded; NASA’s review found the cause.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence against / limits
- The cause was traced to a tank.
Sources: NASA: 50 years ago, “Houston, we’ve had a problem” (13 April 2020) ↗ · NASA: Apollo 13 mission page ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“The flag waves, so there must be wind.”
It moved only while being handled; a rod held it out, and it then stayed still.
Who says it: Kaysing, Fox 2001.
Evidence for the claim
- It looks like it ripples.
Evidence against / limits
- Video shows it still when untouched.
Sources: NASA NTRS: Where No Flag Has Gone Before ↗ · NASA history: One Small Step, One Giant Leap ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“No stars proves a studio.”
Fast exposures set for a sunlit surface cannot capture faint stars.
Who says it: Kaysing and others.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA Science: Where Are the Stars? ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“Shadows point different ways, so studio lights.”
Uneven ground and perspective make parallel shadows look non-parallel.
Who says it: Hoax books.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA history: Astronaut Still Photography During Apollo ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“Astronauts in shadow are lit, so floodlights.”
The sunlit surface reflects light into shadows.
Who says it: Hoax books.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA history: Astronaut Still Photography During Apollo ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“A rock marked “C” was a prop.”
The C is on some prints but not the original film; it was a hair or fiber in copying.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo Lunar Surface Journal: Apollo 16 image library ↗ · Stuart Robbins, Exposing PseudoAstronomy: The prop rock labeled with a “C” (2008) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“Objects in front of crosshairs show photos were faked.”
The crosshairs are on a glass plate; bright areas bleed over thin black lines.
Who says it: Fox 2001.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA history: Astronaut Still Photography During Apollo ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“No blast crater under the lander.”
The engine was throttled down and the soil is firm under a thin dust layer.
Who says it: Kaysing, Fox 2001.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo 11: contemporary public-affairs mission report ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“No dust on the landing pads.”
In vacuum, dust flew away on straight paths instead of settling.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA Science: Moon Dust ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“Apollo 11 faked distance shots of Earth through a window.”
Sibrel’s clip is cut from footage that shows the full disk at distance.
Who says it: Bart Sibrel.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Clavius: Review of “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The photos
“Two photos taken miles apart share a backdrop.”
Distant mountains look the same from nearby points; foregrounds differ.
Who says it: Fox 2001.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA history: Astronaut Still Photography During Apollo ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Physics & the footage
“No one could survive the Van Allen belts.”
Crews crossed quickly; skin doses averaged 0.46 rad.
Who says it: Hoax books.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo Lunar Surface Journal: Radiation Environment and dosimeter readings ↗ · Apollo Experience Report: Protection Against Radiation, 1973 ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Physics & the footage
“A NASA engineer admitted we cannot pass the belts.”
Kelly Smith spoke of the danger to Orion’s electronics on an uncrewed test.
Who says it: Viral clip.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: NASA Premieres ‘Trial By Fire’ Video on Orion’s Flight Test (release 14-278, 8 October 2014) ↗ · FlatEarth.ws: Orion EFT-1, Apollo and the Van Allen Radiation Belts ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Physics & the footage
“The moonwalks are slowed-down Earth footage.”
Dust flies in clean arcs, and a hammer and feather fall together.
Who says it: Fox 2001.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA Science: Apollo 15 Hammer-Feather Drop ↗ · NASA Science: Moon Dust ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Physics & the footage
“The film would have melted.”
In vacuum, heat moves slowly; cameras were silvered and film was in magazines.
Who says it: Hoax books.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA history: Astronaut Still Photography During Apollo ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Physics & the footage
“Astronauts would have cooked in their suits.”
Suits had water-cooled garments and sublimators.
Who says it: Hoax books.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA NTRS: Apollo IEVA Spacesuit Origins and Development ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Physics & the footage
“Someone was already on the Moon to film Armstrong.”
A camera on the lander filmed him.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo 11: contemporary public-affairs mission report ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Physics & the footage
“Only a cameraman could follow Apollo 17’s liftoff.”
Ed Fendell sent timed commands from Houston.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA oral history: Edward Fendell, October 19, 2000 ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Independent evidence
“Hubble could show the flags if they were there.”
Hubble’s resolution at the Moon is far too coarse.
Who says it: Popular claim.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: LRO images offer sharper views of Apollo 12, 14 and 17 sites (NASA SVS, 2011) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Independent evidence
“Lasers bounce off the Moon anyway.”
Returns come sharply from the reflector sites.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Battat and colleagues: Fifteen years of millimeter accuracy lunar laser ranging with APOLLO (2023) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Independent evidence
“The Moon rocks were made on Earth.”
They lack water and show cosmic-ray exposure and features labs worldwide have confirmed.
Who says it: Hoax books.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: Apollo samples yield new information about the Moon (2025) ↗ · Lunar and Planetary Institute: Lunar Sample Atlas ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Independent evidence
“The rocks are Antarctic meteorites.”
The first lunar meteorite was found in 1982, after Apollo.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Meteoritical Bulletin: Allan Hills A81005, the first recognized lunar meteorite ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Independent evidence
“The Dutch rock proves all Moon rocks are fake.”
Its origin was never documented; the official Dutch gift is real.
Who says it: Viral posts.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: AP via NBC News: “Moon rock” in museum is just petrified wood (27 August 2009) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Independent evidence
“A robot relay faked the signals.”
It would have to land and talk live.
Who says it: Skeptics.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: John Sarkissian: On Eagle’s Wings, Parkes support of Apollo 11 (PASA, 2001) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Independent evidence
“The Soviets would have exposed a fake.”
They tracked Apollo and never claimed fakery.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA: 50 years ago, the U.S. and Soviet Union sign a space cooperation agreement ↗ · Jodrell Bank: Recordings of Luna 15’s attempt to beat Apollo 11 (3 July 2009) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Independent evidence
“Leonov said Kubrick filmed parts of Apollo 11.”
He said reshoots were staged in a studio, which is not documented.
Who says it: Russian interviews.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: RIA Novosti: Alexei Leonov dispels rumors that the Americans were not on the Moon (20 July 2009, Russian) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Tapes & records
“The tapes were destroyed to hide fakery.”
The 1970s reuse covered hundreds of thousands of tapes.
Who says it: Hoax sites.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: collectSPACE: “Lost tapes” lost for good, NASA releases restored footage (16 July 2009) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Tapes & records
“NASA lost the Saturn V blueprints.”
Engineering records survive; what is gone is the factory and tooling.
Who says it: Viral posts.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA history: Apollo 20 cancellation and the closed Saturn V production line ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Tapes & records
“We can’t go back because we never went.”
The Saturn V line was closed in 1968; the industry must be rebuilt.
Who says it: Viral posts.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: NASA history: Apollo 20 cancellation and the closed Saturn V production line ↗ · IBTimes UK: Don Pettit, next logical step is to go back to the Moon (2016) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The people
“The punch proves Aldrin was hiding something.”
It shows anger at being called a liar.
Who says it: Sibrel supporters.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Los Angeles Times: No charges for Aldrin in punch (21 September 2002) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The people
“Kubrick confessed on film.”
An actor played him in a T. Patrick Murray film.
Who says it: Viral video.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Snopes: Did Stanley Kubrick confess to faking the Moon landing? ↗ · Reuters Fact Check: Actor playing Stanley Kubrick discusses staging Moon landing ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The people
“Footage shows Kubrick’s hoax set.”
It was from the 2018 film First Man.
Who says it: Viral video.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Snopes: Did Stanley Kubrick confess to faking the Moon landing? ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The people
“Aldrin admitted “we didn’t go there”.”
He was answering why no one had gone back.
Who says it: Viral clip.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Snopes: Did Buzz Aldrin admit the Moon landing never happened? (2018) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The people
“Kim Kardashian’s doubts are backed by Aldrin.”
NASA replied it had been to the Moon six times.
Who says it: Kardashian.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: BBC: NASA responds after Kim Kardashian says Moon landing was fake (3 November 2025) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The strange stuff
“Armstrong said “Good luck, Mr. Gorsky” on the Moon.”
The line does not appear in the transcripts; Armstrong denied it.
Who says it: A joke circulating since 1995.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo Lunar Surface Journal: Neil’s urban myth (“Good luck, Mr. Gorsky”) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The strange stuff
“See-through astronauts prove a composite fake.”
Ghosting came from scan conversion of slow-scan TV.
Who says it: Viral videos.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Discover: This is why the Apollo 11 moonwalkers look ghostly ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The strange stuff
“White spots in the TV show studio lights.”
They came from scan converters on Earth.
Who says it: Viral videos.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Apollo Lunar Surface Journal: Apollo 11 scan converter spots ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The strange stuff
“Aldrin saw an alien craft.”
He said it was sunlight on a panel from their own rocket.
Who says it: TV documentary edit.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Business Insider: Buzz Aldrin’s Apollo 11 “UFO” encounter (July 2014) ↗ · Reuters Fact Check: Buzz Aldrin did not claim to have seen aliens on the way to the Moon ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE The strange stuff
“A secret Apollo 20 found an alien woman.”
Apollo 20 was cancelled in 1970.
Who says it: Online videos.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Reuters Fact Check: No evidence of human remains dubbed “Mona Lisa” found on the Moon ↗ · NASA: Apollo 13 preparation and cancellation of Apollo 20 ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Polls, Artemis & now
“New photos prove Artemis II Earth images were fake.”
Fact-checkers found the viral images were AI-altered.
Who says it: Viral posts, April 2026.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: Reuters Fact Check: AI-altered images of Earth misrepresented as Apollo 8 and Artemis II photos (15 April 2026) ↗ · AFP Fact Check: Artemis II Earth images (April 2026) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Polls, Artemis & now
“A large share of Americans believe it was faked.”
Most polls find about one in twenty.
Who says it: Headlines.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: AEI, Karlyn Bowman: The Moon Landing and Beyond (16 July 2019) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Polls, Artemis & now
“Artemis II was faked.”
Viral “proof” was AI or old images.
Who says it: Viral posts.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: PolitiFact: Moon photos shared as Artemis II images are AI or old NASA images (8 April 2026) ↗ · AFP Fact Check: Broadcast caption error does not show Artemis II was staged (2026) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Polls, Artemis & now
“A TV caption error proves Artemis was staged.”
Fact-checkers found it was a broadcast caption error.
Who says it: Viral posts.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: AFP Fact Check: Broadcast caption error does not show Artemis II was staged (2026) ↗
Read the full file ↗
FALSE Polls, Artemis & now
“Leaked photos expose Artemis fakery.”
They were AI-made or old.
Who says it: Viral posts.
Evidence for the claim
- No supporting evidence identified in the public record.
Evidence against / limits
Sources: PolitiFact: Moon photos shared as Artemis II images are AI or old NASA images (8 April 2026) ↗
Read the full file ↗
Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.