COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

E. Howard Hunt and the three tramps

A Watergate burglar, a deathbed chart, and three men marched across Dealey Plaza.

← Interactive guide and chronology · The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

Who the tramps were

Their arrest sheets settled it.

The three men were arrested as vagrants and held four days as “investigative” prisoners. The night before they had showered and shaved at a rescue mission, which is why they looked cleaner than tramps were expected to. [1]

Their Dallas arrest records surfaced, and in 1992 the FBI found and questioned two of them: John Gedney and Harold Doyle. The third, Gus Abrams, was believed dead. [1][2]

Before that, the House committee had forensic anthropologists compare the photographs with Hunt, Frank Sturgis and several other suspects. Only one, Fred Lee Chrisman, had consistent features, and the committee found no positive identification and no evidence linking him to the assassination. [3]

What we can’t tell you. Doyle and Gedney told the FBI they had nothing to do with it and arrived after the shooting. That is their account; the arrest sheets back up who they were.

The sources

  1. Los Angeles Times: “Two of the ‘tramps’ questioned,” 4 March 1992 ↗

    The FBI finds John Gedney and Harold Doyle after their Dallas arrest sheets surface; Gus Abrams is probably dead.

  2. Washington Post: “FBI questions ‘tramps’ at JFK slaying site,” 4 March 1992 ↗

    Same story. Blocks scripted fetches; confirmed by search.

  3. HSCA final report, part I-B: scientific acoustical evidence of a second gunman ↗

    The committee’s acoustics finding: a “high probability” that two gunmen fired, one from the knoll.

The libel trial

What the jury actually decided.

In 1978 the Liberty Lobby’s paper, The Spotlight, ran an article saying Hunt had been in Dallas on 22 November. Hunt sued and won $650,000, but the verdict was overturned on appeal. At the 1985 retrial, with Mark Lane defending, the jury found for Liberty Lobby. One juror said the panel felt no evidence had been presented showing malice toward Hunt; the judge had told the jury malice was needed to find for him. [1]

Hunt, who served 33 months in prison for Watergate, denied under oath that he was in Dallas. The House committee found that a rumored CIA memo placing him there was “not founded on fact.” [1][2]

What we can’t tell you. A libel verdict turns on what a publisher knew and intended, not on whether a claim is true.

The sources

  1. Los Angeles Times: “Jury rules against Hunt in libel suit,” 7 February 1985 ↗

    Liberty Lobby wins the retrial of Hunt’s libel suit over a 1978 Spotlight article; a juror says no malice was shown.

  2. HSCA final report, part I-B: scientific acoustical evidence of a second gunman ↗

    The committee’s acoustics finding: a “high probability” that two gunmen fired, one from the knoll.

The “last confessions”

A son’s account of a chart and a tape.

In 2007 Rolling Stone published an account by St. John Hunt of his father’s final notes and a tape. In it Hunt describes a meeting in Miami with the CIA officer David Morales and Frank Sturgis about “the Big Event”; he said he declined to take part, describing the CIA’s Bill Harvey as “an alcoholic psycho.” A handwritten chart links LBJ, Cord Meyer, Harvey, Morales and a “French Gunman Grassy Knoll.” [1]

Hunt died at 88, after writing a memoir, American Spy. He always denied involvement. Kevin Costner reportedly offered $5 million for the story. [1]

What we can’t tell you. Nothing in the account has been corroborated by records.

The sources

  1. Rolling Stone: “The Last Confessions of E. Howard Hunt,” 2007 (archived copy) ↗

    St. John Hunt’s account of his father’s notes and tape.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

3 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 155 rated claims ↗

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.