COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

Six seconds in Dealey Plaza

What witnesses saw and heard, how many shots, and where they came from

← Interactive guide and chronology · The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

What the witnesses said

The eyewitness record, including the parts that do not fit.

The consensus among witnesses was three shots. Some heard only two; others heard four, five or six. The Warren Commission reported this spread itself and said gunshots in a plaza ringed by buildings are hard to count. [1]

Howard Brennan, a steamfitter sitting on a retaining wall about 120 feet from the window, promptly told a policeman he had seen a slender man of about 5 feet 10 inches take deliberate aim from the sixth-floor corner window and fire. At 12:45 p.m. the police radio broadcast a description based mainly on what he said. [5][1]

That evening Brennan picked Oswald out of a lineup as the man who most closely resembled the gunman, but said he could not make a positive identification. He had already seen Oswald’s picture on television. In December he told the FBI he was sure; in January he seemed to back off again. To the Commission he said he could have made a positive identification on the first night but held back out of fear: he thought it was “a Communist activity” and that his family “might not be safe.” Because of the wavering, the Commission said it did not base its conclusion on his later certainty. [2]

Two other witnesses, Ronald Fischer and Robert Edwards, described a man in that window about a minute before the shots, though neither saw any shooting. [2]

The House committee later sorted 178 witness statements on where the shots came from: 49, or 27.5%, said the Depository; 21, or 11.8%, said the grassy knoll; 30 named somewhere else; 78 could not say. Only four said shots came from more than one place. [3]

James Tague, standing near the triple underpass far down the street, was stung on the cheek by debris. A mark was found on the curb near him. This is the strongest evidence that at least one shot missed. [1][4]

What we can’t tell you. Witnesses were interviewed days or months later, often after seeing news reports; acoustic echoes in the plaza confuse direction.

The sources

  1. Warren Commission report, chapter 3: the shots from the Texas School Book Depository ↗

    Witnesses, the rifle and cartridge cases, the wounds, the Zapruder timing (18.3 frames a second), the 2.3-second bolt minimum and the “approximately 4.8 to in excess of 7 seconds” estimate.

  2. Warren Commission report, chapter 4: the assassin ↗

    The rifle order from Klein’s under the name A. Hidell, the paper bag, the palm print, the Marine scores (212 in 1956, 191 in 1959), the Tippit evidence and the paraffin test the Commission did not rely on.

  3. HSCA volume XII: Dealey Plaza witness analysis (AARC mirror) ↗

    How the committee sorted 178 witness statements on where the shots came from.

  4. James Tague: Warren Commission testimony, volume VII (AARC mirror) ↗

    The bystander near the triple underpass whose cheek was stung by debris from a curb strike.

  5. Warren Commission report, chapter 1: summary and conclusions ↗

    The Commission’s own conclusions: three shots from the sixth-floor window, the single-bullet finding described as “very persuasive”, Oswald as the killer of Kennedy and Tippit, Ruby acting alone, no conspiracy found.

The sixth floor

What was found at the window.

Around 1 p.m. Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney noticed a pile of cartons in front of the southeast corner window on the sixth floor. At about 1:12 he found three empty cartridge cases on the floor near the window; they were photographed before anything was moved. At 1:22 two deputies found a bolt-action rifle with a telescopic sight between two rows of boxes in the northwest corner near the staircase. When it was picked up and the bolt opened, a live round was ejected. It was an Italian 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Carcano, serial number C2766. [2]

The FBI linked all three cases to that rifle to the exclusion of all other weapons, and linked the nearly whole bullet found at Parkland and two large fragments from the front seat of the limousine to it the same way. [1][3]

The rifle had been bought by mail from Klein’s Sporting Goods in Chicago in March 1963 under the name A. Hidell and shipped to a Dallas post office box rented by Oswald. A hand-made paper bag long enough to carry the rifle disassembled was found near the window, and Oswald’s palm print was lifted from the barrel. Those links are in the rifle file. [4]

What we can’t tell you. The scene was searched by several agencies in the first hours; some critics question how evidence was handled and photographed.

The sources

  1. Warren Commission report, chapter 1: summary and conclusions ↗

    The Commission’s own conclusions: three shots from the sixth-floor window, the single-bullet finding described as “very persuasive”, Oswald as the killer of Kennedy and Tippit, Ruby acting alone, no conspiracy found.

  2. Warren Commission report, chapter 3: the shots from the Texas School Book Depository ↗

    Witnesses, the rifle and cartridge cases, the wounds, the Zapruder timing (18.3 frames a second), the 2.3-second bolt minimum and the “approximately 4.8 to in excess of 7 seconds” estimate.

  3. Robert Frazier: FBI firearms testimony, volume III (AARC mirror) ↗

    The FBI examiner who matched CE 399 and the large fragments to the Carcano and test-fired it.

  4. Warren Commission report, chapter 4: the assassin ↗

    The rifle order from Klein’s under the name A. Hidell, the paper bag, the palm print, the Marine scores (212 in 1956, 191 in 1959), the Tippit evidence and the paraffin test the Commission did not rely on.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

1 claim people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 155 rated claims ↗

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.