The day

Parkland and the autopsy

The throat wound, the “back of the head,” a bungled autopsy, burned notes and a missing brain

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Failures documented; alteration unproven

The autopsy’s failures and the lost brain are documented by the government’s own panels. The House committee’s experts found the photos and X-rays authentic and the wounds consistent with shots from behind. Body alteration has no documentary support.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

7 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

DISPUTED Wounds, autopsy & Parkland

“The throat wound was an entrance wound.”

Dr. Perry said that afternoon it could have been an entrance; he later said he had no way to know, not having seen the back wound. Under the autopsy findings it was an exit.

Who says it: Critics.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 155 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Warren Commission report, chapter 3: the shots from the Texas School Book Depository ↗

    Witnesses, the rifle and cartridge cases, the wounds, the Zapruder timing (18.3 frames a second), the 2.3-second bolt minimum and the “approximately 4.8 to in excess of 7 seconds” estimate.

  2. Malcolm Perry: HSCA interview, 11 January 1978, volume VII (AARC mirror) ↗

    The Parkland surgeon who cut a tracheotomy through the throat wound and called it a possible entrance at a press briefing.

  3. Warren Commission report, chapter 1: summary and conclusions ↗

    The Commission’s own conclusions: three shots from the sixth-floor window, the single-bullet finding described as “very persuasive”, Oswald as the killer of Kennedy and Tippit, Ruby acting alone, no conspiracy found.

  4. HSCA medical panel: performance of the autopsy, volume VII (AARC mirror) ↗

    The panel’s list of autopsy failures: no dissection of the neck track, poor documentation and missing measurements.

  5. James Humes: ARRB deposition, 13 February 1996 (transcript) ↗

    The chief autopsy pathologist on burning his original notes and first draft.

  6. ARRB final report, chapter 6 part II: medical, film and ballistics records ↗

    The Board’s account of gaps and errors in the autopsy record, and its statement that it was not reinvestigating the crime.

  7. HSCA: chain of custody and missing autopsy materials, volume VII (AARC mirror) ↗

    What happened to the brain, tissue slides and other materials after 1965.

  8. HSCA: authenticity of the autopsy photographs and X-rays, volume VII ↗

    Photographic and anthropological comparisons the committee used to conclude the images were of Kennedy and unaltered.

  9. Cyril Wecht: dissent from the HSCA forensic pathology panel, volume VII (AARC mirror) ↗

    The one pathologist of nine who rejected the single-bullet conclusion.

  10. Warren Commission report, chapter 2: the assassination ↗

    The trip’s planning, the route published in advance in Dallas newspapers, the motorcade and the arrival at Parkland.

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.

← JFK case filesAll AI Files