COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The Assassination Records Review Board

Five citizens who forced open millions of pages, 1994–1998

← Interactive guide and chronology · The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

What the Board did

Not a new investigation; a declassification machine.

The Board consisted of five citizens trained in history, archives and law who were not government employees but could order agencies to declassify records. The 1992 law gave it three years; delays in appointing it meant 18 months had already passed, and its work was extended to four. [1]

Its report lists what it did: it reviewed and voted on more than 27,000 previously redacted records and got agencies to release more than 33,000 more. It ensured the Zapruder film “belonged to the American people” and arranged the first known authenticity study of it. It released 99 percent of the Hardway/Lopez report on Oswald in Mexico City. It recorded a three-day interview with FBI agent James Hosty. It found the original notes of Oswald’s interrogation taken by Hosty and Dallas police captain Will Fritz, which had been thought not to exist. It deposed 10 people from the Bethesda autopsy and five Parkland doctors. [1]

Its legacy, it said, was “more than four million pages of records” in the National Archives. [1]

What we can’t tell you. The Board’s own description of its achievements.

The sources

  1. Assassination Records Review Board final report (1998): executive summary ↗

    What the 1992 JFK Records Act required and what the Board did in 1994–1998.

The Secret Service’s 1995 shredding

Destroyed after the law said keep everything.

The Board reported that in January 1995, after the JFK Act had passed and while the Secret Service was supposedly complying with it, the Service destroyed presidential protection survey reports for some of Kennedy’s trips in the autumn of 1963. The Board learned of it about a week later. It thought the records would have been relevant and asked the Service to explain; the Service did so in letters and a briefing. For the Secret Service’s performance in Dallas, see the Secret Service file. [1]

What we can’t tell you. The Board did not find the destruction was meant to hide anything about the assassination.

The sources

  1. ARRB final report, chapter 8: agency compliance ↗

    Includes the Secret Service’s January 1995 destruction of 1963 protective survey reports after the law took effect.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

2 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 155 rated claims ↗

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.