origins

A study built on unequal ground

Macon County, the Public Health Service and the shift from a treatment campaign to observation.

Tuskegee Syphilis Study test subjects picking cotton.
U.S. Public Health Service / CDC; National Archives · Source & image context ↗

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Documented federal study

The study began in 1932 in a segregated, economically unequal setting; participation did not constitute informed consent.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. HEW advisory panel: Charge I, origins, treatment and continuation (1973), printed pp. 5–13 ↗

    Federal primary report, reproduced by Louisiana State University. Read the named section; the panel acknowledges gaps in surviving documentation and differences of judgment.

  2. National Archives: If Not for the Public Outcry (2017), archival correspondence ↗

    Primary statement, institutional record or specifically attributed research. Its scope is described in the article; it is not independent proof of every later inference.

  3. CDC: About the USPHS Untreated Syphilis Study at Tuskegee (2024) ↗

    Official retrospective, dated September 2024; counts described as current on that page are not verified 2026 totals.

  4. CDC: Museum account of the Public Health Service study ↗

    Primary statement, institutional record or specifically attributed research. Its scope is described in the article; it is not independent proof of every later inference.

← Tuskegee filesAll AI Files