COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The East Wing and the ballroom

A demolished wing, a $400 million project, the courts and the donors

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Trump hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

Who gets to rebuild the White House?

Two courts said he needed Congress. The Supreme Court let construction continue while the case goes on.

On 31 July 2025 the White House announced a “State Ballroom” of about 90,000 square feet on the site of the East Wing, paid for by “President Trump, and other patriot donors.” On 20 October Trump announced that ground had been broken; by 23 October the East Wing was gone. Later plans showed 89,000 square feet, seating for 1,000 and a projected cost of about $400 million. [1]

The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued in December 2025. On 31 March 2026 Judge Richard Leon granted an injunction: “The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!” He wrote that “no statute comes close” to giving the president the authority he claimed. [1]

On 16 April he narrowed the order to bar above-ground construction of the ballroom while allowing below-ground work, including national-security facilities, and work needed for the president’s safety. [2]

On 7 August a divided D.C. Circuit panel affirmed. “Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help,” Judges Millett and Garcia wrote, adding that the ruling had “nothing at all to do with whether the proposed ballroom is desirable.” Judge Rao dissented. [3]

On 31 August the Supreme Court, 5–4, stayed the injunction while the government seeks review. Chief Justice Roberts dissented, joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson. Construction can continue for now. [4]

What we can’t tell you. The Supreme Court’s stay is temporary and is not a ruling on the merits. Whether the Court takes the case, and how it rules, was unresolved as of 22 October 2026.

The sources

  1. U.S. District Court (D.D.C.): National Trust for Historic Preservation v. National Park Service, memorandum opinion, filed 31 Mar 2026 ↗

    Judge Richard Leon’s opinion granting a preliminary injunction; its background section sets out the July 2025 announcement, the October 2025 demolition and the project’s size and projected cost.

  2. U.S. District Court (D.D.C.): amended preliminary-injunction order, 16 Apr 2026 ↗

    Bars above-ground ballroom construction while allowing below-ground and security work.

  3. U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: National Trust v. National Park Service, decided 7 Aug 2026 (court document via Courthouse News) ↗

    2–1 decision affirming the injunction; Judges Millett and Garcia for the court, Judge Rao dissenting.

  4. SCOTUSblog case page: National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation (26A203) ↗

    Docket summary: stay granted 5–4 on 31 Aug 2026 pending a petition for certiorari; Chief Justice Roberts dissented, joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson.

The ballroom and its donors

A $330 million private-donor project on White House grounds, and the companies paying for it.

Trump had the East Wing demolished in 2025 to build a ballroom he said would be privately funded. On 15 October 2026 the Washington Post published documents showing about $330 million pledged, with 67 contributions over $10,000 as of late September. Apple and Nvidia each gave $25 million, the Post reported; Amazon, Palantir, Meta, Microsoft and others gave millions. [1][2]

The money went through a nonprofit trust; donors received pledge forms for the “Donald J. Trump Ballroom.” Several of the companies have major federal contracts or regulatory business before the administration. Nvidia told CNBC its support was “independent of any business interests”; ServiceNow called any link to its government business “wholly inaccurate.” [2]

What we can’t tell you. The Post’s documents are not public in full; figures are as reported.

The sources

  1. Washington Post: Secret documents reveal donors behind $330 million for Trump’s ballroom, 15 Oct 2026 ↗

    Investigative report based on donor documents. Paywalled; figures are the Post’s.

  2. CNBC: Nvidia, Cisco gave millions to Trump ballroom, 15 Oct 2026 ↗

    Follow-up on the Post’s donor list.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 137 rated claims ↗

← The Trump hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesTrump shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesTrump.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.