Ukraine

Burisma: what was Hunter paid to do?

The board seat, the money, the “brand” and the man who owned the company

Gas-industry infrastructure pictured in a Burisma-related photograph dated July 4, 2015; not evidence of a particular payment or act.
Bella Bellini · Source & image context ↗

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Documented

The job, the pay and the conflict of interest are documented, and the State Department flagged the conflict at the time. Devon Archer testified that “the brand” was part of the value. No record shows that Joe Biden took money from Burisma or changed policy for it.

Full illustrated guide: Burisma deep guide (12 chapters) ↗ — board, pay, State warning, Archer brand. This page remains the maintained case gateway.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

5 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

DOCUMENTED Ukraine, Burisma & Shokin

“Hunter was paid a lot to sit on a Ukrainian gas company’s board with no energy experience.”

Burisma paid $83,333.33 a month to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, from which Hunter was paid; Senate investigators counted 39 such payments.

Who says it: Senate Republican report, Hunter himself.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

PARTLY TRUE Ukraine, Burisma & Shokin

“Hunter was paid $50,000 a month by Burisma.”

The documented fee was $83,333 a month to a firm tied to Archer, from which Hunter was paid. A flat $50,000 a month to Hunter is a common rounding the records cited here do not show exactly.

Who says it: Common online figure.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 126 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Hunter Biden deposition, February 28, 2024 ↗

    Primary congressional transcript; Hunter’s explanations and denials are attributed testimony, not independent findings. Relevant pages include 21–34, 81–84, 104–106, 116–118 and 145–146. Questions can contain contested premises.

  2. Senate Republican staff report: Hunter Biden, Burisma and corruption, September 2020 ↗

    Republican majority report compiling documents and testimony; its characterizations are investigators’ conclusions, not criminal judgments. This guide uses its documented ethics warnings without adopting every allegation.

  3. Devon Archer interview, July 31, 2023 ↗

    Primary transcript, especially pages 24–36, 101–108 and 124–126. Archer describes his recollections and understanding; distinguish what he heard directly from what he inferred.

  4. NBC News, 2022: analysis of Hunter Biden’s hard drive shows firm took in $11 million from 2013 to 2018 ↗

    NBC’s own review of the laptop data on Hunter’s income, and where it went.

  5. FactCheck.org: Republicans oversell Archer’s testimony, August 2023 ↗

    Secondary comparison of specific claims with transcript passages, linked for readers to inspect the reasoning rather than accept a label.

  6. Daily Beast, September 2019: Joe Biden: “I’ve never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings” ↗

    The Iowa remark later contrasted with testimony about speakerphone calls.

  7. CBS News, 27 October 2019: Joe Biden on Hunter Biden’s connection with Ukrainian company: “He did not do a single thing wrong” ↗

    Biden’s 60 Minutes interview on Burisma.

  8. U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, remarks at the Odesa Financial Forum, 24 September 2015 (Just Security copy) ↗

    The U.S. ambassador publicly accuses officials in the Prosecutor General’s Office of undermining a British case that had frozen $23 million of Mykola Zlochevsky’s assets.

  9. NPR, 4 October 2019: What to know about the Ukrainian company at the heart of Trump’s Biden allegation ↗

    Background on Burisma, Zlochevsky and the cases against him.

  10. CNN, 13 January 2020: Russians hacked Burisma, cybersecurity firm says ↗

    Area 1 Security’s report of a GRU phishing campaign against Burisma in late 2019.

← The Biden Family hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesBiden shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesBiden.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.