COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

Burisma: what was Hunter paid to do?

The board seat, the money, the “brand” and the man who owned the company

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Biden Family hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

The job and the money

What Hunter did, and what he was paid.

Burisma Holdings is Ukraine’s biggest private gas producer. Its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, was ecology minister under the pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, who fled in February 2014. That spring Zlochevsky recruited Western names to his board: the former Polish president Aleksander Kwasniewski, Devon Archer, and Hunter Biden. [1][2][3]

Burisma paid $83,333.33 a month to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, an entity tied to Archer, from which Hunter was paid; Senate Republican investigators counted 39 such payments, and Hunter put his own average at about $65,000 a month over five years. NBC’s review of financial records on the laptop found that Hunter and his company took in about $11 million in 2013–2018 from Burisma and a Chinese firm combined. [1][2][4]

Hunter testified that he advised on corporate governance and international expansion, and that he attended board meetings. He had no experience in the gas industry or in Ukraine. [1]

What we can’t tell you. Payments varied over time and were split among entities; the monthly figures are not a single salary.

The sources

  1. Hunter Biden deposition, February 28, 2024 ↗

    Primary congressional transcript; Hunter’s explanations and denials are attributed testimony, not independent findings. Relevant pages include 21–34, 81–84, 104–106, 116–118 and 145–146. Questions can contain contested premises.

  2. Senate Republican staff report: Hunter Biden, Burisma and corruption, September 2020 ↗

    Republican majority report compiling documents and testimony; its characterizations are investigators’ conclusions, not criminal judgments. This guide uses its documented ethics warnings without adopting every allegation.

  3. Devon Archer interview, July 31, 2023 ↗

    Primary transcript, especially pages 24–36, 101–108 and 124–126. Archer describes his recollections and understanding; distinguish what he heard directly from what he inferred.

  4. NBC News, 2022: analysis of Hunter Biden’s hard drive shows firm took in $11 million from 2013 to 2018 ↗

    NBC’s own review of the laptop data on Hunter’s income, and where it went.

“The brand”: what Burisma was buying

Archer’s testimony, and the State Department’s warning.

Devon Archer, Hunter’s former partner, told the House Oversight Committee in July 2023 that Burisma would have survived without the Biden name, but that “the brand” helped it. He said Hunter was part of a wider effort to give the company protection in Washington, and that Hunter put his father on the phone with associates about 20 times over a decade, with talk that was social, “niceties,” not business. [1][2]

Archer also described a December 2015 board meeting in Dubai. Zlochevsky and his deputy Vadym Pozharskyi asked Hunter for help with pressure the company was under, and Hunter stepped away with them to “call D.C.” Archer did not hear the call and said no one told him it was to the vice president. [1]

George Kent, then a senior State Department official, testified that in early 2015 he told the vice president’s office that Hunter’s role created the perception of a conflict of interest and complicated U.S. anti-corruption work in Ukraine. Senate Republican investigators found that neither the vice president’s office nor the State Department acted on such concerns. Joe Biden said in September 2019: “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” A month later he said Hunter “did not do a single thing wrong.” [3][4][5]

What we can’t tell you. Archer’s account of what Burisma hoped for is his understanding, not Burisma’s own records.

The sources

  1. Devon Archer interview, July 31, 2023 ↗

    Primary transcript, especially pages 24–36, 101–108 and 124–126. Archer describes his recollections and understanding; distinguish what he heard directly from what he inferred.

  2. FactCheck.org: Republicans oversell Archer’s testimony, August 2023 ↗

    Secondary comparison of specific claims with transcript passages, linked for readers to inspect the reasoning rather than accept a label.

  3. Senate Republican staff report: Hunter Biden, Burisma and corruption, September 2020 ↗

    Republican majority report compiling documents and testimony; its characterizations are investigators’ conclusions, not criminal judgments. This guide uses its documented ethics warnings without adopting every allegation.

  4. Daily Beast, September 2019: Joe Biden: “I’ve never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings” ↗

    The Iowa remark later contrasted with testimony about speakerphone calls.

  5. CBS News, 27 October 2019: Joe Biden on Hunter Biden’s connection with Ukrainian company: “He did not do a single thing wrong” ↗

    Biden’s 60 Minutes interview on Burisma.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

5 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 126 rated claims ↗

← The Biden Family hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesBiden shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesBiden.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.