COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The landing sites from orbit

What NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter can and cannot show.

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Moon File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

The strongest version of this theory

Discuss on XDispute thisSupport thisShare

Of course NASA’s camera shows NASA’s landers.

Every high-resolution picture of the Apollo sites comes from the same agency accused of faking the landings. The objects are a few pixels across. A skeptic can fairly ask why anyone should trust them. [1][2]

The sources

  1. LRO images offer sharper views of Apollo 12, 14 and 17 sites (NASA SVS, 2011) ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  2. LRO explores the Apollo 11 landing site (NASA, 2017) ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

What the pictures show

Discuss on XDispute thisSupport thisShare

Hardware, shadows and footpaths in the right places.

LRO has photographed all six Apollo landing sites. The closer views show descent stages and their shadows, experiment packages and long dark trails of disturbed soil. At Apollo 17 the rover tracks and walking routes match the surface photographs and the recorded traverses. [1][3]

There are limits. The images do not show individual bootprints, faces or plaques, and enlarging a web image cannot add detail the camera did not record. [1][2]

The case is about fit: the right objects, in the right places, matching photographs taken on the surface decades earlier. In May 2026 NASA moved management of the LRO camera to the company Intuitive Machines and its data to Texas A&M; the orbiter is still working. [4]

What we can’t tell you. Trails are visible; individual footprints are not.

The sources

  1. LRO images offer sharper views of Apollo 12, 14 and 17 sites (NASA SVS, 2011) ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  2. LRO explores the Apollo 11 landing site (NASA, 2017) ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  3. LRO begins Moon mapping mission: 15-year retrospective (NASA) ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  4. NASA transfers management of lunar science instruments (May 18, 2026) ↗

    NASA, 18 May 2026: LRO continues in orbit; LROC operations moved to new management. Cited for the orbiter’s status, not image analysis.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

3 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 111 rated claims ↗

← The Moon File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file

PREVIOUS CASE
Six landings, twelve moonwalkers↗NEXT CASE
What other countries have seen↗

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesMoon shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesMoon.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.