COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

“A pocket calculator flew them to the Moon”

Was 1960s computing good enough?

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Moon File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

The strongest version of this theory

A phone today has a million times the power. How could 1969 do it?

The Apollo Guidance Computer ran on a clock of about 2 megahertz with roughly 2,000 words of erasable memory and 36,000 words of fixed memory woven by hand into “core rope.” [1][2] Today’s phones are millions of times faster.

Landing on another world in real time, with no do-overs, sounds like a job for far more computing power. If NASA lacked it, the argument goes, the landings could only have been staged.

The sources

  1. NASA: Computers in Spaceflight, Apollo hardware decisions ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  2. Smithsonian NASM: Apollo Guidance Computer and the first silicon chips ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

Small chips, one job

Apollo helped create the microchip industry.

The planar integrated circuit was invented in 1959. Apollo was one of the first big buyers, along with the Minuteman missile, and NASA chose to bet on the new chips in 1962. [1][2][3]

The AGC did not need to run graphics or apps. It integrated accelerometer readings, steered the engines and ran a few dozen programs written in tight assembly code. Its software was designed to drop low-priority jobs when overloaded, which is exactly what it did during the 1202 alarms on Apollo 11. [3][4]

Most of the heavy computing was on the ground. Tracking stations measured the spacecraft’s distance and speed, and IBM mainframes in Houston worked out trajectories and sent the numbers up by radio for the crew to load.

What we can’t tell you. Exact memory figures vary slightly between sources because the design changed between Block I and Block II.

The sources

  1. Computer History Museum: aerospace computers and early integrated circuits ↗

    Research / institutional history. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  2. Computer History Museum: first planar integrated circuit ↗

    Research / institutional history. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  3. NASA: Computers in Spaceflight, Apollo hardware decisions ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

  4. Smithsonian NASM: Apollo Guidance Computer and the first silicon chips ↗

    Primary institutional record. Carried from the first edition and re-listed 23 October 2026; cited for the specific point in the text.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

2 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 111 rated claims ↗

← The Moon File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesMoon shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesMoon.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.