COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

Did Lyndon Johnson do it?

The man who gained most. A fingerprint, a mistress story and an oath on Air Force One.

← Interactive guide and chronology · The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

Motive and the theory

Who gained, and who says so.

The theory starts with the oldest question in murder: who benefits. Johnson became president. Gallup noted in 2013 that the Oscar-winning film JFK “implied that President Lyndon Johnson may have been involved.” [1]

In 2013 Roger Stone, the Republican operative, published The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ. Hugh Aynesworth, who covered the assassination as a Dallas reporter in 1963, reviewed it for the Washington Times, found it entertaining, and said it was built on unreliable witnesses. [2]

The handwritten chart that E. Howard Hunt left his son, published by Rolling Stone in 2007, puts “LBJ” at the top. Hunt himself always denied any part in the killing. See Hunt and the tramps. [3]

What we can’t tell you. The House committee found that Johnson privately voiced suspicion of underworld involvement. [4]

The sources

  1. Gallup: “Majority in U.S. still believe JFK killed in a conspiracy,” 15 November 2013 ↗

    The 50th-anniversary reading.

  2. Washington Times: review of Roger Stone’s The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ, 25 February 2014 ↗

    Hugh Aynesworth, a Dallas reporter at the scene in 1963, finds the book entertaining but built on unreliable witnesses. Blocks scripted fetches; confirmed by search.

  3. Rolling Stone: “The Last Confessions of E. Howard Hunt,” 2007 (archived copy) ↗

    St. John Hunt’s account of his father’s notes and tape.

  4. HSCA final report, part I-C: conspiracy findings ↗

    Soviet, Cuban, anti-Castro, organized-crime and agency allegations, one by one.

Where Johnson was the night before

His diary puts him in Houston and Fort Worth.

Some versions of the theory have Johnson meeting plotters in Dallas the night before the shooting. His vice-presidential diary for 21 November 1963 records him in Houston with the presidential party: the President’s suite at 8:00 pm, the Albert Thomas dinner at 8:45, Carswell Air Force Base near Fort Worth at 11:05, and the Texas Hotel in Fort Worth at 11:30 pm. [1]

What we can’t tell you. A diary records the schedule; it cannot prove a negative about every minute after midnight. No source places him in Dallas that night.

The sources

  1. Vice President Johnson’s daily diary, 21 November 1963 (LBJ Library) ↗

    Places Johnson in San Antonio, Houston and then Fort Worth that night.

The Mac Wallace fingerprint

The one piece of physical evidence offered, and what the FBI said.

Malcolm Everett “Mac” Wallace is the man LBJ theorists cast as Johnson’s gunman. In 1998 a fingerprint examiner, Nathan Darby, signed an affidavit dated 9 March saying he had matched a Wallace print to an unidentified latent print from the Depository. [1][2]

A second examiner, Harold Hoffmeister, had confirmed the match in a blind test. On 16 April 1998 he wrote to the FBI renouncing that confirmation. The FBI examined the print and reported on 15 March 1999 that it “is not a fingerprint of Malcolm Everett Wallace.” [2]

What we can’t tell you. Darby’s affidavit is posted by a proponent site that blocks scripted fetches; the FBI result comes from the FOIA file reproduced by Lobster magazine.

The sources

  1. Nathan Darby affidavit on a “Mac Wallace” fingerprint, 1998 (as posted by a proponent) ↗

    His 9 March 1998 affidavit claims two matches between Wallace’s prints and a Depository print; examined from copies, not the original card.

  2. Lobster magazine: “Two stories about JFK fingerprints,” 2015 ↗

    FOIA file: the FBI’s 15 March 1999 report that the latent print “is not a fingerprint of Malcolm Everett Wallace,” and examiner Harold Hoffmeister’s April 1998 letter withdrawing his confirming affidavit.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 155 rated claims ↗

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.