COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

Jim Garrison and the trial of Clay Shaw

The only prosecution ever brought for the assassination, and what it got right and wrong

← Interactive guide and chronology · The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

The case against Shaw

One witness, one alias, and a memo that left it out.

On 1 March 1967 Garrison arrested Clay Shaw, a well-known New Orleans businessman, and charged him with conspiring to kill President Kennedy. Two years later a jury acquitted him. [1]

The core of the case was Perry Russo, a young man who knew Ferrie. At trial in February 1969 he testified that at a gathering in Ferrie’s apartment in September 1963 he was introduced to a man named “Clem Bertrand,” whom he identified as Shaw, and to Ferrie’s roommate, “Leon Oswald.” He described Ferrie talking about a crossfire, a diversionary shot and a scapegoat. [2]

Under cross-examination, Assistant District Attorney Andrew Sciambra agreed that he had interviewed Russo in Baton Rouge on 25 February 1967 and written a detailed seven-page memo, and that the memo did not mention the conspiracy meeting. Sciambra said the meeting was covered in a second memo, written about a session in which Russo was given sodium pentothal. [3]

What we can’t tell you. The trial transcripts are poor scans; we quote only what could be read clearly.

The sources

  1. National Archives: Clay Shaw papers finding aid ↗

    Garrison arrested Shaw on 1 March 1967 and charged him with conspiring to kill Kennedy; two years later a jury acquitted him.

  2. State of Louisiana v. Clay Shaw: Perry Russo testimony, 10 February 1969 (AARC mirror) ↗

    The key prosecution witness at Shaw’s trial.

  3. State v. Shaw: Andrew Sciambra testimony, 12 February 1969 (AARC mirror) ↗

    The assistant DA on how Russo’s account was first taken and later developed.

What held up: Clinton and Camp Street

The House committee, cautiously, took part of Garrison’s story seriously.

The House committee said it was aware that Garrison “had been fairly criticized for questionable tactics” and checked his material on its own. It found that six witnesses in Clinton, Louisiana, among them a state representative, a deputy sheriff and a registrar of voters, were “credible and significant.” Some said Oswald came with two older men they identified as Ferrie and Shaw. [1]

The committee concluded that it was “inclined to believe that Oswald was in Clinton, La., in late August, early September 1963, and that he was in the company of David Ferrie, if not Clay Shaw.” It also found “at least a possibility” that Oswald and Guy Banister, a former FBI agent running a detective agency at 531 Lafayette Street, knew each other. The building’s other entrance was 544 Camp Street, the address Oswald stamped on his leaflets. [1][3]

Ferrie, an anti-Castro activist and pilot, also did investigative work for a lawyer representing Carlos Marcello, the New Orleans mob boss. He denied knowing Oswald. Allegations that the two met when Oswald was a Civil Air Patrol cadet in 1954–55 were investigated by the committee. [2]

What we can’t tell you. What an association between Oswald and Ferrie meant, if it existed, is unknown.

The sources

  1. HSCA final report, part I-C: conspiracy findings ↗

    Soviet, Cuban, anti-Castro, organized-crime and agency allegations, one by one.

  2. HSCA staff report: David Ferrie, volume X (AARC mirror) ↗

    Ferrie, Marcello, the Civil Air Patrol and the Texas trip after the assassination.

  3. HSCA staff report: 544 Camp Street, volume X (AARC mirror) ↗

    The address on Oswald’s leaflets and Guy Banister’s office around the corner.

From Garrison to the JFK Act

A failed prosecution that, through a movie, opened the files.

Oliver Stone’s 1991 film JFK starred Kevin Costner as Garrison and ended by saying millions of pages of records were still secret. The National Security Archive describes the 1992 JFK Records Act as passed “in the wake of a public uproar” over the film. The Review Board’s report says Congress was “disturbed by the conclusions of Oliver Stone’s JFK.” [1][2]

The Review Board later secured Garrison’s investigative records, Shaw’s diaries, Shaw’s defense files and the grand jury records for the public collection. [2]

What we can’t tell you. None.

The sources

  1. National Security Archive: “CIA covert ops, Kennedy assassination records lift veil of secrecy,” 19 March 2025 ↗

    Side-by-side comparison of 2025 documents with earlier redacted copies.

  2. Assassination Records Review Board final report (1998): executive summary ↗

    What the 1992 JFK Records Act required and what the Board did in 1994–1998.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 155 rated claims ↗

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.