COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION
The test that said “two bullets,” and the scientists who said it couldn’t
← Interactive guide and chronology · The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓
The two-bullet finding.
Neutron activation measures trace elements in bullet lead. Testing for the House committee, Guinn compared CE 399 with the fragments. The committee concluded it was “highly likely” the wrist fragments came from CE 399 and found evidence of only two bullets. [1]
In 2004 the National Research Council reviewed the FBI’s bullet-lead method in criminal cases and found such compositional matches cannot reliably tie a fragment to a particular bullet or box. [2]
What we can’t tell you. The NRC review addressed FBI casework, not Guinn’s JFK tests directly.
The committee’s review of the rifle, the wounds and Oswald.
Why compositional bullet-lead matches cannot single out one bullet.
Are Carcano bullets as distinctive as assumed?
In 2007 Cliff Spiegelman and colleagues tested bullets reportedly from the same batch as those used in the assassination and found matches within a box much more likely than the House testimony said. One of their ten test bullets matched one or more assassination fragments. That, they wrote, means the matching fragments “could have come from three or more separate bullets.” They called for re-testing. [1]
The fragments were scanned in 3-D by the National Institute of Standards and Technology in 2019 so they could be studied without handling. [2]
What we can’t tell you. Re-testing the original fragments has not been done.
Statistical challenge to the bullet-lead evidence that the fragments came from only two bullets.
3D scans of CE 399 and the fragments for researchers.
WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE
1 claim people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.
The lead chemistry behind that claim has been undermined; it no longer proves two bullets.
Who says it: Vincent Guinn, the House committee.
Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.
Reader comments
On X
This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.
Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.
Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.