COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The 1996 complaint

An artist told the FBI about Epstein a decade before Palm Beach. The complaint surfaced in 2025.

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Epstein Files hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

What the complaint says

Photographs, threats and a warning nobody acted on.

The complaint, stamped 3 September 1996 and confirmed by her lawyer Jennifer Freeman, says Epstein stole photographs and negatives of Farmer’s younger sisters, who were minors, that he might have sold them, that he asked her for pictures of girls at swimming pools, and that he threatened to burn her house down if she told anyone. [1]

Maria Farmer has said publicly for years that she reported Epstein to both the New York police and the FBI in 1996 and that nothing happened. Her 2019 affidavit also describes an assault that summer by Epstein and Maxwell at a property owned by Les Wexner in Ohio. Maria and Annie Farmer chose to go public. [2][3]

What we can’t tell you. The FBI file does not show what agents did next. Her other allegations are sworn but have not been tested in court.

The sources

  1. CNN: A 1996 complaint to the FBI about Epstein surfaces in the files, 19 Dec 2025 ↗

    Report on the FBI complaint stamped September 1996, confirmed by Farmer’s lawyer.

  2. Maria Farmer affidavit, Giuffre v. Dershowitz, S.D.N.Y., Apr 2019 ↗

    Her sworn account, including the 1996 Ohio allegation. Sworn, but untested at trial.

  3. New York Times: The sisters who first tried to take down Jeffrey Epstein, 26 Aug 2019 (archived) ↗

    Profile of Maria and Annie Farmer, who went public by choice.

Why it matters

A decade of “what if.”

For years, officials and Epstein’s defenders could say the first complaint came from Palm Beach in 2005. The 1996 document undercuts that. Whatever its handling, a federal agency had a written warning about a wealthy man and girls nine years before the police investigation that led to the 2007 deal. [1][2]

Readers who suspect protection see a pattern that begins here. Readers who suspect ordinary failure note that a single complaint about photographs, without a victim willing to testify, often went nowhere in 1996. Both readings fit the document; only the FBI’s own records can choose between them, and those have not been released. [1]

What we can’t tell you. More records could emerge; this page will change if they do.

The sources

  1. CNN: A 1996 complaint to the FBI about Epstein surfaces in the files, 19 Dec 2025 ↗

    Report on the FBI complaint stamped September 1996, confirmed by Farmer’s lawyer.

  2. ABC News: After years of speculation, Justice Department faces deadline to release Epstein files, Dec 2025 ↗

    Context on the December 2025 release that included the 1996 complaint.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

3 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 211 rated claims ↗

← The Epstein Files hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesEpstein shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesEpstein.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.