Ukraine

Did Biden get the prosecutor fired to protect Burisma?

Viktor Shokin, the billion-dollar loan guarantee and what the Burisma cases looked like

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

False

The pressure was real and Biden bragged about it. The claim that he did it to protect Burisma is not supported: Western governments and Ukrainian reformers wanted Shokin out for failing to prosecute corruption, including the Burisma case, and Ukrainian police later closed a case Shokin brought for lack of a crime.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

3 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

DOCUMENTED Ukraine, Burisma & Shokin

“Biden bragged about getting a prosecutor fired by threatening aid.”

He told the Council on Foreign Relations he threatened to withhold a $1 billion loan guarantee: “son of a bitch, he got fired.”

Who says it: Biden’s own words, on video.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

FALSE Ukraine, Burisma & Shokin

“Biden fired Shokin to protect Burisma.”

The U.S., Europe, the IMF and Ukrainian reformers all wanted him out for failing to fight corruption; the Burisma case was dormant under him.

Who says it: Trump, Giuliani, Shokin.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

FALSE Ukraine, Burisma & Shokin

“Shokin was actively investigating Burisma when he was fired.”

Contemporary records show the case had stalled; the Western complaint was that he was not pursuing it.

Who says it: Shokin’s 2019 statement.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 126 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Foreign Affairs Issue Launch with former Vice President Joe Biden, January 23, 2018 ↗

    Original public discussion in which Biden describes conditioning a loan guarantee on the prosecutor’s removal. His account establishes his stated action, not the motive asserted by later critics.

  2. U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, remarks at the Odesa Financial Forum, 24 September 2015 (Just Security copy) ↗

    The U.S. ambassador publicly accuses officials in the Prosecutor General’s Office of undermining a British case that had frozen $23 million of Mykola Zlochevsky’s assets.

  3. Obama White House background briefing on Ukraine, December 2, 2015 ↗

    Contemporaneous official policy explanation; anonymous senior officials stated prosecution reform was an administration objective before the 2019 controversy.

  4. IMF managing director statement on Ukraine, February 10, 2016 ↗

    Contemporaneous warning about stalled governance and anticorruption reform. The URL includes an older directory date; the statement itself is dated February 10, 2016. It does not itself specifically order Shokin’s dismissal.

  5. Senate Ukraine Caucus, 12 February 2016: letter to President Poroshenko urging prosecutor-general reform (archived Portman press release) ↗

    Senators of both parties, including Republicans Rob Portman, Ron Johnson and Mark Kirk, press Ukraine to reform the Prosecutor General’s Office a month before Shokin is removed.

  6. House Oversight Democrats: fact sheet on the firing of Viktor Shokin ↗

    A partisan compilation, but it quotes on-record statements by the IMF, the EU envoy, Ukrainian deputy prosecutor Vitaliy Kasko and others.

  7. Kyiv Post, 29 March 2016: Parliament sacks Prosecutor General Shokin ↗

    Contemporary report of the Rada vote.

  8. Viktor Shokin, witness statement of 4 September 2019 for Dmytro Firtash’s lawyers (scan published by FactCheck.org) ↗

    Shokin’s own account of his dismissal, prepared for Firtash’s extradition litigation in Austria.

  9. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 2019: Why was Ukraine’s top prosecutor fired? Viktor Shokin’s dismissal explained ↗

    Lays out both sides, with Ukrainian prosecutors and anti-corruption activists on the state of the Burisma cases.

  10. Devon Archer interview, July 31, 2023 ↗

    Primary transcript, especially pages 24–36, 101–108 and 124–126. Archer describes his recollections and understanding; distinguish what he heard directly from what he inferred.

  11. National Police of Ukraine, November 2020: police lawfully closed an investigation involving Joe Biden ↗

    The ministry statement that a case opened on Shokin’s complaint was closed for lack of a crime.

  12. NBC News, November 2020: Ukraine police close Biden probe initiated by ousted prosecutor ↗

    News account of the closure.

  13. Senate Republican staff report: Hunter Biden, Burisma and corruption, September 2020 ↗

    Republican majority report compiling documents and testimony; its characterizations are investigators’ conclusions, not criminal judgments. This guide uses its documented ethics warnings without adopting every allegation.

  14. CNN KFile, 3 October 2019: GOP senators echoed Biden on Ukraine reforms ↗

    Reports the caucus letter and the wider Western push to remove Shokin.

← The Biden Family hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesBiden shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesBiden.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.