THE BOOK / 1984

Secret Agenda: Hougan’s case

McCord’s sabotage, the taped doors and the call-girl phone.

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

UNPROVEN

Hougan’s puzzles are real, and a federal judge said his call-girl theory “may be correct”. No court or investigation has found that McCord sabotaged the operation or that call girls were the target.

THE EVENTS / THE CLAIM / THE RECORD

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

2 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

UNPROVEN The alternative theories

“The real target was a call-girl ring run near the DNC.”

Hougan and Silent Coup argued it, and a federal judge said the theory “may be correct”. No court or investigation found it, and Wells denied it.

Who says it: Jim Hougan; Colodny and Gettlin.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 99 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Contemporary review of Secret Agenda, preserved in the CIA Reading Room ↗

    A newspaper/book review preserved as an intelligence-file item. Archival possession is not CIA endorsement of the review or the book’s thesis.

  2. Wells v. Liddy: published district-court opinion, March 19, 2001 ↗

    A defamation ruling addressing fault, sources and evidence, not a final history of Watergate. This 2001 procedural stage was followed by an appeal and a later 2002 jury verdict; no historical truth ruling is inferred.

  3. National Archives — “Wills on Duty”: the guard who discovered the break-in ↗

    National Archives archivist’s retrospective grounded in the contemporaneous guard log and trial exhibits; distinguishes Wills’s role from later famous reporters.

  4. Wells v. Liddy, 186 F.3d 505 (4th Cir. 1999) ↗

    Appeals court opinion summarizing Secret Agenda, Silent Coup and Liddy’s call-girl account, and holding that Ida “Maxie” Wells was a private figure. Its summaries describe the books’ claims; they are not findings that the claims are true.

  5. Ford Library: James W. McCord Jr. letter to Judge John Sirica, 19 March 1973 ↗

    Image and citation of the letter filed in United States v. Liddy (NARA, Record Group 21). Sirica read it in court on 23 March 1973; the letter is dated 19 March.

  6. Rockefeller Commission report, 1975: White House/CIA contacts and Watergate, printed pp. 180–207 ↗

    Executive commission investigation of CIA activities. Its conclusion was no evidence of Agency participation or advance knowledge of the Watergate burglary; it also criticized other assistance and responses. Not proof that every secret activity is known.

← The Watergate Files hub: the history, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesWatergate shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesWatergate.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.