Courts & accountability

The hush-money case

A criminal verdict, a disputed legal theory and an unfinished appeal.

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Criminal conviction; appeal unresolved

34 guilty counts; unconditional discharge; no final reversal established.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction, May 30, 2024 ↗

    Prosecutor’s description of a jury result. Advocacy language about motives is attributed; the verdict itself was returned by a jury.

  2. Judge Merchan: January 3, 2025 sentencing decision ↗

    Primary court or government record, original public statement, or identified reporting; read the linked source for its scope.

  3. AP: Excerpts from the January 10, 2025 sentencing ↗

    Primary court or government record, original public statement, or identified reporting; read the linked source for its scope.

  4. Trial jury instructions: falsification, election-law predicate and unanimity ↗

    Primary instructions, particularly pages 27–32. Unanimity was required on guilt and the election-law conspiracy, but not the particular unlawful means; describing the verdict itself as nonunanimous is inaccurate.

  5. Judge Hellerstein: August 28, 2026 removal decision, docket document 93 ↗

    The August 2026 ruling concerns federal removal and immunity, not a completed state merits appeal.