The AI Files · Trump net-worth claims, Forbes estimates, tax-return fights, and what filings establish about federal income tax paid · 1982–2026
For 2016 and again for 2017, the Form 1040s Congress released show Donald and Melania Trump owed $750 in federal income tax. That number became a slogan. The returns, the Joint Committee on Taxation report, and Forbes’s estimates tell a longer story about losses, credits, valuations, and what ‘rich’ even means on paper.
This page keeps the mainstream path labeled, puts primaries first, and scores rival readings against a sixteen-step critical path — including when public memory flipped.
Wealth and taxes guide hero — Trump wealth and taxes guide Image: Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped
The story
Chapter 1
For tax years 2016 and 2017, the Form 1040s Congress released show Donald and Melania Trump owed **$750** in federal income tax — the “Net tax” line. [1][2]
That figure became a slogan: *billionaire who pays nothing.*
Forbes, in September 2026, still estimates his fortune near **$7 billion**. [3]
Those are different questions. This page keeps them on separate spines — and shows when public memory mashed them together.
Chapter 2
Sixteen links hold the mainstream wealth-and-taxes story: from the Forbes duel through loss years, return secrecy, the $750 scoop, JCT tables, and today’s estimate. Full list at [#path](#path). Theories are judged by which links they break, bend, or invent.
Critical path — 16 steps
Chapter 3
In 1982 Forbes places Trump (with family fortune) among America’s richest. He argues for a higher number. [4] **CP1**
Later Forbes histories say he even called as “John Barron” to push valuations. [5]
Public “how rich” begins as an argument with a magazine — not an audit.
Chapter 4
The 1987 book locks a dealmaker-billionaire myth. [6]
Brand narrative is not a Form 1040. It is how millions first met the wealth story.
Chapter 5
Around 1990 Forbes slashes or removes Trump as casino and hotel debts mount. [7][4] **CP2**
The public rich-list path breaks when cash flow does. Bankruptcies are a sibling spine for that era. [8]
Chapter 6
In 2019 the *New York Times* reports filings showing more than a billion dollars in losses across 1985–1994. [9] **CP4**
Forbes treats that reporting as consistent with the list drop. [7]
Labeled **press reporting** from obtained records — not the December 2022 committee PDF set.
Chapter 7
October 2018: the Times alleges aggressive tax strategies in transfers from Fred Trump. [10] **CP3**
That piece reframes “self-made” in popular memory. It is not a Tax Court judgment.
Chapter 8
Modern nominees had customarily released Form 1040s. Trump does not. “Under audit” becomes the excuse. [11][12] **CP5**
OGE Form 278e asset ranges are not tax returns — a category error that still circulates. [13]
Chapter 11
*Trump v. Mazars* (2020) sets a test for House subpoenas of private financial records. [18] **CP8**
It is **not** the Ways & Means §6103 tax-return case. Keep the forks labeled.
IRS-settlement litigation over producing returns to Congress is a sibling nest — not rebuilt here. [19]
Chapter 13
December 15, 2022: Joint Committee on Taxation staff deliver year-by-year figures and an exam-file critique. [1] **CP10**
Tom Barthold tells Ways & Means: the report is **not an audit** and draws **no conclusion** that any line is right or wrong. [22][23]
That ceiling blocks both “JCT proved he cheated” and “JCT cleared him.”
Chapter 15
JCT’s Net tax table: **$641,931** (2015), **$750** (2016), **$750** (2017), **$999,466** (2018), **$133,445** (2019), **$0** (2020). [1] **CP12**
“He only ever paid $750” is **false** as a universal claim. Two $750 years are **true**.
Net tax ≠ all taxes paid to all governments.
Chapter 16
NOLs, a large rehabilitation credit, §108(i) cancelled-debt income, conservation-easement questions — statutory architecture and exam flags. [1][25][26] **CP13**
Depreciation and NOL rules are the strongest Trump-camp steelman that still respects the filings. They do not erase higher Net tax years or Engoron’s valuation findings.
Chapter 17
JCT criticizes mandatory-exam gaps, unused specialists, and reliance on “professionals prepared it.” Several years lacked a final Revenue Agent Report in the files reviewed. [1] **CP14**
Supports a soft-scope critique. Does **not** prove a conspiracy — and does not prove underpayment amounts.
Chapter 18
February 16, 2024: Engoron finds years of falsely inflated Statement of Financial Condition asset values. [27] **CP15**
That is bank-paper wealth — not Form 1040 Net tax. Full treatment lives in the civil-fraud guide. [28]
Chapter 20
Seven readings live in [#theories](#theories): the labeled mainstream map; depreciation/NOL genius; “never pays”; fake-billionaire/broke; self-claim $10B+; IRS captured; and pre-release “Times invented it.” Each must say which critical-path steps it removes or adds — and what would have to be fake.
Chapter 21
It will not treat a Forbes estimate as an IRS appraisal. It will not equate Form 1040 Net tax with all taxes paid. It will not merge Organization criminal tax, IRS-settlement litigation, Foundation self-dealing, or civil-fraud penalties into the $750 slogan. [30][19][31]
Ukraine-war material is out of scope. Grokipedia is never a source.
Chapter 22
Income tax paid. Net worth estimated. Valuations litigated. Three questions. Primaries first. Mainstream labeled. When unfinished exams close or Forbes methods move, the path on this page should move with them. [1][32][27]
Explore
Pick an era, or search everything at once: entries, people, dated events, claims, theories and media.
Threads
Each thread pulls together the entries on one question, across all the eras.
Key people
Trump, Melania, Ways & Means, JCT staff, IRS exam teams, Forbes valuers, NYT investigators, and the civil-fraud valuation court.
Donald J. TrumpTaxpayer; candidate; PresidentJoint Form 1040 filer (with Melania for years at issue); decades-long disputant of Forbes estimates; refused customary return releases.
Melania TrumpJoint filer (2015–2020 returns)Named on joint Form 1040s reviewed by JCT for 2015–2020.
Fred C. TrumpFather; wealth-transfer subject of NYT 2018NYT investigative reporting centers him in alleged family tax strategies that seeded Donald’s fortune narrative.
Ivanka TrumpRelated-party loan / consulting questions in JCT notesJCT notes interest income from related-party loans and discusses consulting-fee issues raised in press that IRS risked.
Donald Trump Jr.Related-party loan interest (JCT)Appears in JCT notes on related-party loan interest income.
Eric TrumpRelated-party loan interest (JCT)Appears in JCT notes on related-party loan interest income.
Trump Organization / DJT Holdings LLCPass-through empire feeding Form 1040Hundreds of pass-throughs; DJT Holdings LLC returns were among those JCT reviewed.
Richard NealChairman, House Ways & MeansInvoked §6103(f) to request presidential returns and IRS exam materials; steered release fight.
Thomas A. BartholdChief of Staff, Joint Committee on TaxationWalked Ways & Means through the JCT report; stressed it is not an audit and draws no line-accuracy conclusions.
Joint Committee on Taxation staffNonpartisan tax staffPrepared the Dec 15, 2022 report summarizing returns and IRS exam files.
House Ways and Means Committee§6103 requesting committeeObtained and later released 2015–2020 return materials.
IRS exam teams (LB&I)Auditors of presidential / related returnsJCT reviews their workpapers; critiques specialist non-use and limited scopes in places.
Charles RettigIRS Commissioner (request era)Addressee (with Treasury) of Neal’s June 16, 2021 §6103 letter as described by JCT.
Janet YellenTreasury Secretary (request era)Addressee of Neal’s June 16, 2021 letter requesting return information.
Russ BuettnerNew York Times investigative reporterCo-author of major Trump tax investigations including Sep 2020.
Susanne CraigNew York Times investigative reporterCo-author of Sep 2020 tax investigation.
Mike McIntireNew York Times investigative reporterCo-author of Sep 2020 tax investigation.
Dan AlexanderForbes wealth reporterLead Forbes voice on Trump net-worth estimates and list history.
Forbes (Forbes 400 desk)Journalist net-worth estimatorPublishes the recurring estimate Trump disputes; methodology is not an IRS audit.
Jonathan GreenbergFormer Forbes reporterRecounts 1980s contacts including the ‘John Barron’ persona episode in later Forbes histories.
Arthur EngoronN.Y. Supreme Court JusticeFeb 2024 civil-fraud decision on SFC valuations — cross-link, not the tax-paid question.
Mazars USA LLPAccounting firm / subpoena targetRecipient of House financial-records subpoenas litigated to the Supreme Court in 2020.
Supreme Court of the United StatesMazars opinion; later stay posture on §6103Decided Mazars (2020); denied stay clearing Ways & Means path (Nov 2022).
U.S. Court of Appeals (D.C. Circuit)§6103 appellate courtIssued controlling appellate opinion in the committee tax-return litigation stream.
Michael CohenFormer fixer (Forbes valuation anecdotes)Appears in Forbes reconstructions of efforts to inflate public fortune figures — anecdotal to NW duel, not Form 1040 lines.
Tony SchwartzCo-author, Art of the DealHelped craft the 1980s wealth-and-deal brand narrative.
Allen WeisselbergLongtime Organization CFO (company-tax sibling)Central to company criminal tax case — cross-link company-tax nest; not the personal Form 1040 spine.
Karen McAfeeWays & Means Oversight staff director (transcript)Presented with Barthold in the Dec 20, 2022 executive session.
Office of Government Ethics (disclosure system)278e financial disclosure regimePublic asset/liability ranges — frequently confused with tax returns.
Federal Election CommissionCandidate disclosure regimePersonal financial disclosures for candidates — not Form 1040 releases.
Seven Springs LLC (easement)Conservation easement flow-throughJCT discusses ~$21M conservation easement contribution issues flowing toward Form 1040.
Trump Old Post Office LLCHotel / rehabilitation credit nexusJCT and IRS notes discuss large rehabilitation credit tied to Old Post Office renovations.
Public memory audiencesRival slogan networksCamps that compressed the story to ‘never pays’ or ‘genius depreciation’ or ‘fake billionaire.’
Timeline
31 dated events, 1982–2026, each with its source.
What we know now
Official JCT report and Commons Form 1040 scans remain retrievable; Forbes continues to publish estimates.
Source: Joint Committee on Taxation staff — Report to Ways & Means Chairman Neal (Dec 15, 2022)
Read the full entryThe Dec 2022 report repeatedly notes missing final Revenue Agent Reports — unfinished business, not clearance.
Source: Joint Committee on Taxation staff — Report to Ways & Means Chairman Neal (Dec 15, 2022)
Read the full entryLatest Forbes 400 snapshot continues the estimate duel amid volatile DJT/crypto assets.
Source: Forbes — 45th Annual Forbes 400 ranking release (Sep 15, 2026)
Read the full entryEngoron findings (and later appeal history) live in the civil-fraud guide; do not merge into Net tax slogans.
Source: People v. Trump — Engoron decision on summary judgment (Feb 16, 2024)
Read the full entryParallel nests/guides cover production litigation and Organization criminal tax — not rebuilt here.
Source: AI Files — Trump IRS settlement nest / guide (sibling; do not rebuild here)
Read the full entryThe yardstick
Sixteen links the mainstream wealth-and-taxes story needs. Theories are judged by which links they remove or add.
Forbes 400 places Trump (with family fortune) on America’s rich list; he immediately disputes the number upward — establishing the estimate-vs-claim duel.[1][2]
On the timelineAs casino/hotel debt bites, Forbes removes or sharply cuts Trump; later pieces tie the decade to large tax losses.[3][1][4]
On the timelineTimes investigative reporting alleges aggressive family wealth-transfer tax strategies — press reporting that reframes ‘self-made’ wealth.[5]
On the timelineTimes reports >$1 billion in losses on tax filings across a decade that overlaps Forbes list drama.[6][3]
On the timelineUnlike modern major-party nominees, Trump does not release Form 1040s; ‘under audit’ becomes the public excuse — secrecy becomes the political fact.[7][8]
On the timelineTimes, from obtained data, reports $750 federal income tax in 2016 and again in 2017 and chronic losses — national slogan birth (sources protected).[9][10]
On the timelineTrump claims he prepaid millions; contemporaneous analysis says estimated payments were largely refunded or rolled — camp claim vs reporting.[11][12]
On the timelineSupreme Court sets a separation-of-powers test for House financial-records subpoenas — related transparency fight, not the §6103 return request itself.[13]
On the timelineCommittee’s statutory request for returns advances through D.C. Circuit; Supreme Court denies stay (Nov 2022) — legal door opens.[14][15][8]
On the timelineNonpartisan JCT staff deliver year-by-year figures and audit-file critique; expressly not an audit conclusion; Net tax $750 (2016, 2017), $999,466 (2018), $0 (2020), etc.[16][17][18]
On the timelineWays & Means publishes 2015–2020 Form 1040s and related business returns — primary PDFs enter the public record.[19][20][21]
On the timelineJCT/returns show material federal income tax in some years (e.g., 2015 Net tax $641,931; 2018 $999,466; 2019 $133,445) alongside $750/$0 years — slogan fails as universal.[16][22]
On the timelineJCT details NOL carryovers, rehabilitation credit, §108(i) COD income deferral, conservation easement questions — legal tax attributes and exam flags, not proof of fraud by themselves.[16][23][24]
On the timelineJCT finds mandatory presidential exam began with 2016; criticizes failure to use specialists and reliance on ‘professionals prepared the return’ as assurance.[16][25]
On the timelineEngoron (Feb 2024) finds years of false asset values on Statements of Financial Condition — a valuation spine distinct from Form 1040 tax paid (see civil-fraud guide; later appeal/penalty history there).[26][27]
On the timelineForbes 400 puts Trump near $7 billion amid Trump Media/crypto swings — journalist estimate that continues the CP1 duel, not an audited net worth.[28][29][30]
On the timelineOTHER READINGS
Each theory is scored against the critical path — what it must break, recast, or invent.
Chronic business losses and statutory credits/NOLs explain low federal income tax in some years; Forbes estimates are not audits; SFCs were inflated for banks (civil fraud) — a different question.
Lives in careful reporting and this page’s yardstick.
If true, slogan wars that flatten years or equate NW with tax paid are category errors.
Year table shows $750 and non-$750 years. [1]
Barthold ceiling: not an audit verdict. [2]
Engoron is valuation, not Net tax. [4]
What holds up Documented
Holds as the labeled mainstream map.
Nothing. It leaves every established link standing.
No new links.
Low bills show masterful use of real-estate tax rules; critics confuse legal planning with crime.
Lives in Trump-aligned media whenever $750 is raised.
If fully true, JCT’s exam flags should mostly wash out as nothing-burgers.
Statute really allows depreciation/NOLs. [1][2]
Returns show huge losses. [3]
What holds up Partly true
Strong as a partial explanation; weak as ‘no questions left.’
Compresses the story to permanent zero federal income tax.
Post-Sep 2020 slogan culture.[2]
Lives in protest rhetoric and social media.
If true, 2015/2018/2019 Net tax figures would have to be fake.
Two $750 years and a $0 year are real. [1]
Universal never-pays is not. [1]
What holds up False
Fails the year table.
Public wealth is a con; he is not a real billionaire.
Lives wherever ‘house of cards’ metaphors trend.
If ‘broke’ is true, Forbes ~$7B and large asset bases need collapse.
Inflated SFCs are court-found. [1]
1990s stress was real. [4]
‘Broke now’ overreaches. [2]
What holds up Partly true
Strong on overstatement; weak on insolvency.
Magazine undervalues the brand; true wealth is much higher.
Decades of Trump vs Forbes disputes.[1]
Lives in Trump’s own statements and allied media.
If true, Forbes worksheets miss enormous brand/asset value.
Brand value is hard to price. [3]
Pattern of self-claim > Forbes is documented. [1]
What holds up Unproven
Unproven without audited consolidations.
Exams were kneecapped to protect Trump.
JCT closing observations on specialists and preparer reliance.[1]
Lives in reformist and opposition accountability media.
If ‘captured’ means intentional political protection, needs intent evidence beyond thin scopes.
JCT really criticizes exam design. [1]
‘Captured conspiracy’ is a stronger claim than the report makes. [1]
What holds up Partly true
Partly as ‘soft scope’; unproven as conspiracy.
Anonymous-source journalism invented $750 to wound Trump.
2020–2022 denial rhetoric before PDFs.[3]
Collapsed for the $750 years after Dec 2022 release; may linger as vibes.
If true, JCT tables and Commons PDFs would have to match a fabrication — they don’t.
Source protection created a trust gap. [3]
Release corroborated core $750 years. [1][2]
What holds up Discredited
Discredited on the $750 claim; other NYT allegations remain press-labeled.
Genuinely unknown
What audits never finished, what valuations still mean, and what ‘net worth’ can never settle from a Form 1040.
Ultimate deficiencies, refunds, or no-change letters after Dec 2022.
Report’s file window closed midstream.
Separates ‘flagged’ from ‘owed.’
Final RARs / Tax Court stipulations.
Final administrative or judicial result.
Not resolved in JCT file.
Large charitable carryforward integrity.
Closing agreement or opinion.
Final allowed amount.
Carryforward complexity.
Credits that shelter later years.
Exam closing documents.
GAAP/audited consolidation of the whole empire.
Private company opacity.
Ends the $10B vs $7B vs ‘broke’ war.
Independent audit with full consolidation.
Lifetime property, payroll, state, foreign taxes across entities.
No public consolidated schedule.
‘Pays huge taxes’ slogan.
Entity-level tax cash ledger.
Whether later years would survive harder testing.
Fact-intensive; unfinished.
Nonpassive loss allowance.
Litigated §469 findings.
Named pollster series post-release.
No poll cited here.
Memory without inventing numbers.
Pollster time series.
WHAT PEOPLE SAY
{n} popular claims measured against Form 1040s, the JCT report, Forbes methodology, and court findings on valuations.
What the record shows. True for federal income tax Net tax in 2016 and 2017; false as a claim about every year or all taxes.
Who says it: Critics / NYT headline culture
What the record shows. Contradicted by multiple Net tax years above zero on the released returns.
Who says it: Slogan networks
What the record shows. Partly: statutory depreciation/NOLs explain much; does not make every position correct or erase higher years.
Who says it: Trump-aligned media
What the record shows. Matches Forbes’s Sep 2026 estimate; still an estimate, not an audit; Trump claims higher.
Who says it: Forbes / analysts
What the record shows. Longstanding self-claim; not established by Forbes or an audit.
Who says it: Trump
What the record shows. Partly if meaning ‘inflated SFCs/brand’; weak if meaning ‘broke.’
Who says it: Critics
What the record shows. Estimated payments can be large and still leave low final Net tax.
Who says it: Trump
What the record shows. JCT criticizes specialist non-use and limited scopes; does not prove capture or that deeper exams would have raised tax.
Who says it: Alarmed reformers
What the record shows. Released returns and JCT show the same $750 years.
Who says it: Trump-aligned denial before release
What the record shows. Audits don’t legally bar voluntary release; some exams existed.
Who says it: Trump
What the record shows. Other remittances exist; they don’t rewrite Form 1040 Net tax years.
Who says it: Trump-aligned media
What the record shows. OGE/FEC forms are asset ranges, not Form 1040.
Who says it: Confused defenders
What the record shows. Barthold/JCT expressly refuse accuracy conclusions.
Who says it: Overclaiming critics
What the record shows. 1990s stress was real; secret permanent insolvency not established.
Who says it: Skeptics
What the record shows. He built a brand and deals; NYT family-transfer reporting undercuts ‘entirely.’
Who says it: Trump brand
Media
Return PDFs, the JCT report, Mazars, Forbes estimates, and the investigations that forced the numbers into public view.
Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF strippedinvestigation · 2020Trump’s Taxes Show Chronic Losses…Buettner, Craig, McIntire (New York Times)Protected-source investigation that minted $750 shorthand.Nationalizes the $750 frame before PDFs.
Matching theories: ‘Never pays taxes’ overclaim Pre-release: Times fabricated the taxes
Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF strippedbook · 1987Trump: The Art of the DealDonald J. Trump with Tony SchwartzWealth-brand autobiography.Locks dealmaker-wealth myth before filings.
Matching theories: Self-claim: Forbes too low / $10B+
Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF strippedcongressional staff report · 2022JCT Report to Chairman Neal (Dec 15, 2022)Joint Committee on Taxation staffPrimary year tables and exam critique.Moves $750 from protected-source journalism to nonpartisan tables.
Matching theories: Mainstream path: losses, legal attributes, estimate ≠ audit IRS soft / captured
Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF strippedcourt opinion · 2020Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP opinionSupreme Court of the United StatesFinancial-records subpoena test.Open Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF strippedcourt opinion · 2024Engoron civil-fraud decision (Feb 16, 2024)N.Y. Supreme CourtSFC valuation findings.Separates bank-valuation lies from Form 1040 Net tax.
Matching theories: Fake billionaire / secretly broke Mainstream path: losses, legal attributes, estimate ≠ audit
Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF strippedwealth estimate · 2026Forbes 400 2026 — Trump estimateForbes~$7B snapshot.Open Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF strippedtax return scans · 2022Form 1040 scans (2019–2020) on Wikimedia CommonsIRS / Ways & Means releasePrimary return images.Open Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides (EXIF stripped) · Re-encoded; EXIF strippedtechnical explanation · 2022JCX-20-22 Presidential Tax Filings technical explanationJoint Committee on TaxationLegislative follow-up.Open Public memory
From Art of the Deal billionaire brand to $750 shorthand to post-release JCT critique — and crypto-era Forbes swings.
Lasting impact
Presidential return norms, §6103 fights, and the habit of treating estimates as audits.
§6103 fights and presidential transparency attempts.
Showed a determined House majority can obtain a president’s returns through statute + litigation.
JCX-20-22 technical explanation of a transparency bill after the ad-hoc fight.
JCT’s critique made the IRM program’s gaps a public oversight story.
Reporters, valuers, and staff who forced numbers into view.
Buettner/Craig/McIntire investigations set the public agenda before PDFs.
Decades of estimate warfare became the default ‘how rich’ metric.
Habits of talking about Trump, taxes, and ‘billionaire.’
Tax debate required reading returns few had.
One number stands in for a multi-year table.
The debate. Compression vs accuracy.
Specialists knew list methods were rough.
Mass politics cites Forbes as if audited NW.
How this guide works
Spine sources are the December 15, 2022 Joint Committee on Taxation staff report to Ways & Means Chairman Neal; the December 2022 Ways & Means release of 2015–2020 Form 1040 and related returns; Trump v. Mazars (2020) for the separate financial-records subpoena fight; 26 U.S.C. §6103; Forbes’s published estimates (explicitly not audits); and the February 16, 2024 Engoron civil-fraud decision for Statement of Financial Condition overvaluation findings (full treatment in the civil-fraud sibling guide). New York Times tax investigations are labeled press reporting — important for memory and chronology, corroborated in part once returns were released. Third-party AI encyclopedias including Grokipedia are never sources.
Federal income tax on Form 1040 (‘Net tax’) is not the same as all taxes paid (payroll, property, state, tariffs, etc.). Net worth is not on a Form 1040. A Forbes estimate is not an IRS appraisal. An unfinished IRS exam is not a clearance.
Mainstream path is labeled as mainstream. Rival major-network paths appear as theories with path.removes / path.adds / mustBeFake. The IRS-settlement and company-tax nests are cross-linked, not rebuilt. Ukraine-war material is out of scope.
Pictures & licenses
Every picture is public domain or freely licensed, from Wikimedia Commons. Files are stored on this site with their metadata removed; each credit links to the original.
Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesTrump shows up below after the daily refresh.
Reader comments
On X
Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesTrump.
Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.
Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.