The AI Files · Trump University / Trump Entrepreneur Initiative seminars, lawsuits, and the $25 million settlement (2005–2018) · plain reading edition

Trump University: every entry

All 50 entries of the guide, grouped by period and case, each with its bottom line and its sources. This page needs no JavaScript. The interactive guide adds the story in 20 chapters, the people, the timeline, the theories, the 15 checked claims and the media.

Brand & launch 2004–07

Founding the brand

University without a charter

Trump University LLC is born

Record · History

Brand and founding era (pool image).
Brand and founding era (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

A for-profit real-estate education brand with Trump’s name on the door.

In 2004 Donald Trump, Michael Sexton, and (per the NY AG petition) Jonathan Spitalny formed Trump University LLC as a New York company pitched to teach real-estate investing. [1][2]

The Ninth Circuit later described it as a private for-profit entity purporting to teach Trump’s “secrets of success” in real estate. [3][4]

Bottom line History

A branded seminar business, not a chartered university.

What the record can’t settle

Petition founding details are allegations in form; corporate existence is not disputed.

Sources

  1. NY AG verified petition excerpts — People v. Trump Entrepreneur Initiative (2013) via NYT document tools Pleading detail on 2004 incorporation with Sexton and Jonathan Spitalny; treat as allegations.
  2. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 (1st Dept) Appellate chronology of SED May 2005 letter, 2010 rename to TEI, Sexton Oct 2010 cease-operations notice; useful for licensing spine.
  3. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  4. Ninth Circuit — Trump University as private for-profit teaching ‘secrets of success’ Opening description of the business model in Low opinion.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

SED’s May 2005 letter

Record · Documented

Licensing and naming — SED’s early red line.
Licensing and naming — SED’s early red line. Appeals/seal stand-in for NYSED licensing fight · Labeled stand-in from civil-fraud pool

New York Education Department says “University” and unlicensed instruction violate state law.

On May 27, 2005, SED notified Trump, Sexton, and Trump University that using “University” without a charter violated the Education Law and that the firm lacked a license to offer instruction in New York. [1][2]

SED said licensure would not be required if the business had no NY physical presence, moved organization out of state, and stopped live NY programs; Sexton replied that a Delaware LLC merge and an end to live NY programming would follow. [1]

Bottom line Documented

The state flag on the name came early — years before the AG lawsuit.

What the record can’t settle

Whether later operations fully complied with Sexton’s assurances is the AG’s contested narrative.

Sources

  1. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 (1st Dept) Appellate chronology of SED May 2005 letter, 2010 rename to TEI, Sexton Oct 2010 cease-operations notice; useful for licensing spine.
  2. New York Education Law / Board of Regents rules on ‘university’ naming (as applied by SED) Cited via AD1 opinion; primary statute text not reproduced here — SED letters are the operational record.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Not a university

Record · Documented

Licensing and naming — SED’s early red line.
Licensing and naming — SED’s early red line. Appeals/seal stand-in for NYSED licensing fight · Labeled stand-in from civil-fraud pool

The name failed New York’s legal test.

SED’s letters and the TEI rename establish that the business was not a chartered university under New York law. [1][2][3]

That naming violation is distinct from — though politically fused with — the later fraud settlements. [4][5]

Bottom line Documented

“Not a university” is the easy, documented piece.

What the record can’t settle

Naming illegality is not automatic proof of every Elite mentorship allegation.

Sources

  1. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 (1st Dept) Appellate chronology of SED May 2005 letter, 2010 rename to TEI, Sexton Oct 2010 cease-operations notice; useful for licensing spine.
  2. New York Education Law / Board of Regents rules on ‘university’ naming (as applied by SED) Cited via AD1 opinion; primary statute text not reproduced here — SED letters are the operational record.
  3. Inside Higher Ed — Trump University told to stop calling itself a university (Apr 2010) Secondary report of SED deputy commissioner Joseph Frey letter on ‘University’ misuse.
  4. AI Files thin nest — Trump University short case Prior short case; becomes gateway after this ship.
  5. Settlement / Ninth Circuit — no admission of wrongdoing Explicit: defendants did not admit wrongdoing; settlement favorable recovery percentages.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Michael Sexton — operator in the dockets

Record · History

Brand and founding era (pool image).
Brand and founding era (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Co-founder/president; SED correspondent; NY AG defendant.

Sexton appears throughout: SED replies in 2005 and 2010, Cohen declaration on the teaching model, and named defendant in the 2013 AG suit. [1][2][3][4]

Bottom line History

Operational face of the business in the paper trail.

What the record can’t settle

Personal culpability allocations were not tried to verdict.

Sources

  1. Michael Sexton — co-founder / former president; NY AG defendant Named defendant; SED correspondence role in AD1 opinion.
  2. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 (1st Dept) Appellate chronology of SED May 2005 letter, 2010 rename to TEI, Sexton Oct 2010 cease-operations notice; useful for licensing spine.
  3. Cohen v. Trump — Order granting class certification (S.D. Cal., Oct 2014) Certifies Live Events purchasers nationwide from Jan 1, 2007; Sexton declaration on free preview → 3-day → mentoring ladder.
  4. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

For-profit from day one

Record · Documented

Brand and founding era (pool image).
Brand and founding era (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

No pretense of a nonprofit college.

Court descriptions treat Trump University as a private for-profit teaching business. [1][2]

Bottom line Documented

The scandal is consumer protection / naming — not “secretly for-profit.”

What the record can’t settle

For-profit status alone is not fraud.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit — Trump University as private for-profit teaching ‘secrets of success’ Opening description of the business model in Low opinion.
  2. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

The Trump brand as the product

Record · History

Brand and founding era (pool image).
Brand and founding era (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Students were buying access to a name.

Cohen certification materials quote Trump deposition testimony on the visibility and multi-billion brand estimates — context for why the name sold seats. [1][2]

Bottom line History

Brand power explains enrollment pull; it does not decide fraud.

What the record can’t settle

Brand valuation estimates are self-interested testimony context.

Sources

  1. Public Trump Organization / Trump brand context in Cohen cert order Deposition excerpts on brand value cited in cert order — brand, not seminar quality proof.
  2. Cohen v. Trump — Order granting class certification (S.D. Cal., Oct 2014) Certifies Live Events purchasers nationwide from Jan 1, 2007; Sexton declaration on free preview → 3-day → mentoring ladder.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Jonathan Spitalny in the petition

Record · History

Brand and founding era (pool image).
Brand and founding era (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Third name in the founding narrative.

The NY AG petition’s founding story names Spitalny alongside Trump and Sexton as incorporating the company; he is described as a nonparty individual in later appellate prose. [1][2]

Bottom line History

Founding cast is broader than the celebrity defendant.

What the record can’t settle

Nonparty status means limited public adjudication of his role.

Sources

  1. NY AG verified petition excerpts — People v. Trump Entrepreneur Initiative (2013) via NYT document tools Pleading detail on 2004 incorporation with Sexton and Jonathan Spitalny; treat as allegations.
  2. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 (1st Dept) Appellate chronology of SED May 2005 letter, 2010 rename to TEI, Sexton Oct 2010 cease-operations notice; useful for licensing spine.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Upsell machine 2007–10

Live Events ladder

Free → $1,495 → Elite

The Live Events ladder

Record · Documented

Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image).
Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Free preview → paid three-day → expensive mentorships.

By mid-to-late 2007, per Sexton’s declaration in the Cohen certification fight, Trump University’s basic model was a free ~90-minute preview, then a ~$1,495 three-day seminar, then optional additional programs including mentoring. [1][2]

The Ninth Circuit’s settlement opinion describes the same ladder: free workshops selling expensive three-day seminars that then aggressively sold mentorships whose promised benefits “never materialized” — the plaintiffs’ theory of the case. [3]

Bottom line Documented

The architecture of the business is well documented even where fraud liability was never tried.

What the record can’t settle

“Never materialized” is the plaintiffs’/court’s summary of allegations heading into settlement, not a jury special verdict.

Sources

  1. Cohen v. Trump — Order granting class certification (S.D. Cal., Oct 2014) Certifies Live Events purchasers nationwide from Jan 1, 2007; Sexton declaration on free preview → 3-day → mentoring ladder.
  2. Sexton declaration — Live Events teaching model (Cohen cert) Defense-side description of free preview → 3-day → additional programs.
  3. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Gold Elite and the $35,000 tier

Record · Documented

elite — Trump University guide
elite — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Top packages cost tens of thousands of dollars.

Tarla Makaeff paid $34,995 for the Trump Gold Elite Program after a ~$1,495 three-day workshop; the package was described as including advanced workshops, field mentoring, and materials. [1]

The NY AG’s 2013 announcement put Elite mentorships in a $10,000–$35,000 range and alleged hard-sell credit-limit pitches to fund those purchases. [2][3]

Bottom line Documented

The price points are not urban legend — they are in the opinions and AG narrative.

What the record can’t settle

Individual ROI outcomes vary by student and were not globally adjudicated.

Sources

  1. Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC, 715 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 2013) Recounts Gold Elite $34,995 path; free preview music/credit-limit pitch; anti-SLAPP posture on TU’s defamation counterclaim.
  2. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  3. NY AG / Makaeff — credit-limit increase pitch at free/3-day events Court opinion and AG both describe credit-limit exhortations tied to Elite purchases.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

“Handpicked instructors”

Record · Alleged

ads — Trump University guide
ads — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Ads promised Trump’s handpicked experts; the AG said he picked none.

NY AG Schneiderman’s office alleged advertisements claimed consumers would learn from Donald Trump’s “handpicked” instructors and that the investigation found Trump did not handpick even a single instructor and had little role developing curricula. [1][2]

Those advertising themes sit inside the fraud theory later settled without admission. [3][4]

Bottom line Alleged

The ad language is real; the AG’s “zero handpicked” finding was never tested to a fraud verdict.

What the record can’t settle

Allegation strength is not a criminal or civil judgment.

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  2. NY AG description of ‘handpicked instructors’ advertising claims (2013 press) AG investigation claim that Trump did not handpick instructors; allegation in pleading/press.
  3. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  4. Settlement / Ninth Circuit — no admission of wrongdoing Explicit: defendants did not admit wrongdoing; settlement favorable recovery percentages.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Raise your credit limit

Record · Alleged

Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image).
Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Instructors pushed credit-limit increases during seminars.

Makaeff’s Ninth Circuit opinion describes representatives exhorting customers to raise credit-card limits ostensibly for real-estate deals but actually to facilitate Gold Elite purchases. [1][2]

The NY AG made the same structural allegation: break-time credit calls were about paying for Elite, not funding deals. [3]

Bottom line Alleged

A recurring factual theme across plaintiff and AG narratives.

What the record can’t settle

Not every attendee’s experience is individually proven in a verdict.

Sources

  1. Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC, 715 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 2013) Recounts Gold Elite $34,995 path; free preview music/credit-limit pitch; anti-SLAPP posture on TU’s defamation counterclaim.
  2. NY AG / Makaeff — credit-limit increase pitch at free/3-day events Court opinion and AG both describe credit-limit exhortations tied to Elite purchases.
  3. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

BBB heat and early complaints

Record · History

Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image).
Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Consumer complaint climate before the big lawsuits.

2010 press reported a Better Business Bureau D-minus rating alongside SED’s renewed naming fight. [1][2]

Makaeff’s path — bank dispute, BBB letter, agency contacts, then suit — shows how individual grievances scaled into class litigation. [3][4]

Bottom line History

Complaint volume was a public problem before Schneiderman filed.

What the record can’t settle

BBB grades are not court findings.

Sources

  1. NY Daily News (archive) — State educrats grade Trump University ‘misleading’ (2010) Quotes Frey letter; Sexton says name may change to Trump Education; BBB D-minus context.
  2. BBB D-minus rating context for Trump University (via 2010 Daily News) Contemporaneous consumer-complaint climate; not a court finding.
  3. Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC, 715 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 2013) Recounts Gold Elite $34,995 path; free preview music/credit-limit pitch; anti-SLAPP posture on TU’s defamation counterclaim.
  4. Makaeff April 2009 email — ‘precarious financial position’ / value complaint Quoted in Ninth Circuit opinion; individual grievance path into litigation.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Seals and “diplomas”

Record · Alleged

Brand and founding era (pool image).
Brand and founding era (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

University-like branding without a charter.

The NY AG alleged Trump University used a university-like seal and awarded diploma-like certificates of completion bearing Trump’s signature, reinforcing the misconception that students were attending a university. [1][2]

Bottom line Alleged

Branding that looked academic was part of the state’s consumer story.

What the record can’t settle

Allegation in AG narrative; no trademark “diploma fraud” criminal case.

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  2. NY AG — university-like seal and diploma-like certificates with Trump signature Branding allegation reinforcing ‘university’ misconception.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Mentorship that didn’t mentor

Record · Alleged

elite — Trump University guide
elite — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Year-long support promised; follow-up alleged thin.

The AG alleged Elite mentorships promised personal assistance until a first deal recouped costs, but many mentors failed to return calls/emails after an initial session. [1][2]

Bottom line Alleged

Delivery gap is central to the “scam” vernacular.

What the record can’t settle

Aggregate allegation; individual mentors differed.

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  2. NY AG — promised year-long apprenticeship support vs delivery Mentorship delivery gap as alleged.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Did Trump personally approve instructors?

Question · Unproven

ads — Trump University guide
ads — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

AG says no; defense branding said yes.

The AG investigation claimed Trump handpicked none; advertising said the opposite. Without a trial record of instructor-selection proof, the gap remains a charged factual dispute inside settled claims. [1][2][3]

Bottom line Unproven

Advertising claim vs AG investigation — unsettled by verdict.

What the record can’t settle

Deposition excerpts exist in litigation files not fully reproduced here.

Sources

  1. NY AG description of ‘handpicked instructors’ advertising claims (2013 press) AG investigation claim that Trump did not handpick instructors; allegation in pleading/press.
  2. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  3. Settlement / Ninth Circuit — no admission of wrongdoing Explicit: defendants did not admit wrongdoing; settlement favorable recovery percentages.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

“Ivy League-quality” marketing climate

Record · History

ads — Trump University guide
ads — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Early web copy boasted elite curriculum language.

2010 Daily News coverage quoted Trump University web boasts of “Ivy League-quality curriculum” and “world-class faculty” while SED called the university name misleading. [1][2]

Bottom line History

Marketing tone collided with regulators early.

What the record can’t settle

Press quotation of website claims — archive-dependent.

Sources

  1. NY Daily News (archive) — State educrats grade Trump University ‘misleading’ (2010) Quotes Frey letter; Sexton says name may change to Trump Education; BBB D-minus context.
  2. Inside Higher Ed — Trump University told to stop calling itself a university (Apr 2010) Secondary report of SED deputy commissioner Joseph Frey letter on ‘University’ misuse.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

“For the Love of Money” at the preview

Record · History

Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image).
Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Apprentice theme as sales atmosphere.

Makaeff’s Ninth Circuit opinion describes slick productions with speakers blaring “For the Love of Money,” the Apprentice theme, as part of the preview choreography into Gold Elite. [1]

Bottom line History

Atmosphere detail from a federal opinion — sales psychology in the record.

What the record can’t settle

Color, not an independent tort.

Sources

  1. Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC, 715 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 2013) Recounts Gold Elite $34,995 path; free preview music/credit-limit pitch; anti-SLAPP posture on TU’s defamation counterclaim.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Rename & wind-down

TEI

From University to Entrepreneur Initiative

Record · Documented

tei — Trump University guide
tei — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

May 2010 rename after SED’s second demand.

In March 2010 SED again demanded that Trump University stop using “University”; in May 2010 the LLC filed a certificate of amendment renaming to The Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC. [1][2][3]

On October 7, 2010, Sexton informed SED that TEI had ceased operations. [1]

Bottom line Documented

The brand retreat is dated and documentary.

What the record can’t settle

AG alleged earlier noncompliance with 2005 conditions; that dispute was later settled, not tried.

Sources

  1. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 (1st Dept) Appellate chronology of SED May 2005 letter, 2010 rename to TEI, Sexton Oct 2010 cease-operations notice; useful for licensing spine.
  2. Trump Entrepreneur Initiative as successor / renamed entity May 2010 certificate of amendment renaming Trump University LLC to TEI.
  3. Inside Higher Ed — Trump University told to stop calling itself a university (Apr 2010) Secondary report of SED deputy commissioner Joseph Frey letter on ‘University’ misuse.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

The lawsuits stack 2010–14

Federal class actions

Makaeff & Cohen

Makaeff sues — and is countersued

Record · History

makaeff — Trump University guide
makaeff — Trump University guide Courthouse stand-in for plaintiff litigation · Labeled stand-in

The early federal class case that also became an anti-SLAPP fight.

In April 2010 Tarla Makaeff filed a class action accusing Trump University of deceptive practices; Trump University counterclaimed for defamation over her BBB/bank/internet statements. [1][2]

The Ninth Circuit’s 2013 Makaeff opinion is a major factual source for the seminar choreography even though its holding centers on anti-SLAPP / public-figure issues. [1]

Bottom line History

Students could be sued for speaking — until the anti-SLAPP fight reshaped that counterclaim.

What the record can’t settle

Do not confuse the anti-SLAPP procedural win with a fraud judgment on the merits.

Sources

  1. Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC, 715 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 2013) Recounts Gold Elite $34,995 path; free preview music/credit-limit pitch; anti-SLAPP posture on TU’s defamation counterclaim.
  2. Trump University defamation counterclaim against Makaeff Business sued a vocal student; anti-SLAPP litigation followed.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Cohen class certified

Record · Official

courthouse — Trump University guide
courthouse — Trump University guide Courthouse exterior pool image (sibling guide re-encode) · Wikimedia / freer license via prior AI Files encode

A nationwide Live Events class from 2007 forward.

Art Cohen’s S.D. Cal. action sought to represent all U.S. purchasers of Trump University Live Events from January 1, 2007; the court granted certification in 2014. [1]

By the settlement era the Ninth Circuit described certified California classes totaling over eight thousand students. [2][3]

Bottom line Official

Scale: thousands of purchasers, not a handful of cranks.

What the record can’t settle

Certification is not a liability finding.

Sources

  1. Cohen v. Trump — Order granting class certification (S.D. Cal., Oct 2014) Certifies Live Events purchasers nationwide from Jan 1, 2007; Sexton declaration on free preview → 3-day → mentoring ladder.
  2. Ninth Circuit — classes of over eight thousand students certified Court’s description of certified California classes.
  3. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Three suits, one settlement

Record · History

courthouse — Trump University guide
courthouse — Trump University guide Courthouse exterior pool image (sibling guide re-encode) · Wikimedia / freer license via prior AI Files encode

Two California class actions + New York’s AG case.

During the 2016 campaign Trump University and Trump faced two S.D. Cal. class actions and the NY AG’s state suit; the December settlement was global across them. [1][2]

Bottom line History

Coordination of remedies mattered as much as any single docket.

What the record can’t settle

State and federal claims had different legal theories even in one deal.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit — two S.D. Cal. class actions + NY AG state suit during 2016 Litigation map for global settlement.
  2. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Named plaintiffs — Low, Everett, Brown, Cohen, Makaeff

Record · History

makaeff — Trump University guide
makaeff — Trump University guide Courthouse stand-in for plaintiff litigation · Labeled stand-in

The caption names behind the classes.

The Ninth Circuit caption lists Sonny Low, J.R. Everett, John Brown, and Art Cohen among class plaintiffs; Makaeff’s earlier case supplied key factual narrative. [1][2][3]

Bottom line History

Real people, not anonymous internet lore.

What the record can’t settle

Representative plaintiffs are not a random sample of all attendees.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  2. Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC, 715 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 2013) Recounts Gold Elite $34,995 path; free preview music/credit-limit pitch; anti-SLAPP posture on TU’s defamation counterclaim.
  3. Cohen v. Trump — Order granting class certification (S.D. Cal., Oct 2014) Certifies Live Events purchasers nationwide from Jan 1, 2007; Sexton declaration on free preview → 3-day → mentoring ladder.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

New York AG

Schneiderman 2013

Schneiderman’s $40 million case

Record · Alleged

Labeled stand-in for the New York AG chapter (not a likeness claim).
Labeled stand-in for the New York AG chapter (not a likeness claim). Government-office stand-in portrait slot (not a likeness claim) · Labeled stand-in

August 25, 2013: New York sues Trump, TEI, and Sexton.

AG Eric Schneiderman announced a lawsuit alleging persistent fraudulent and deceptive conduct from 2005–2011, claiming more than 5,000 people paid about $40 million. [1]

The petition sought restitution, disgorgement, penalties, and injunctive relief — and highlighted handpicked-instructor ads, Elite upsells, cancellation-rights issues, and SED licensing. [1][2][3]

Bottom line Alleged

The state’s consumer-fraud theory is detailed and public — and was resolved by settlement, not verdict.

What the record can’t settle

Press-release rhetoric (“sham university”) is advocacy layered on pleadings.

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  2. NY AG 2013 — seeks injunction, restitution, penalties Remedies requested at filing; later settled.
  3. NY AG — alleged failure to honor federal 3-day cancellation rights Consumer-protection allegation; not separately adjudicated to verdict.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Hard-money lenders on a magazine list

Record · Alleged

Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image).
Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

A concrete AG example of over-promise.

The AG alleged instructors promised access to private “hard money” financing, but consumers instead received lender lists from a commercially available magazine. [1][2]

Bottom line Alleged

Specificity that makes the bait-and-switch story legible.

What the record can’t settle

Still an allegation inside a settled case.

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  2. NY AG — ‘hard money lenders’ promise vs magazine list allegation Specific bait-and-switch example in AG narrative.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

A life-size photo of Trump

Record · Alleged

Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image).
Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Expectation of Donald vs cardboard.

The AG narrative said some consumers were led to expect Trump himself at the three-day seminar and instead got photographs with a life-size photo. [1][2]

Bottom line Alleged

A vivid detail — illustrative, not a damages schedule.

What the record can’t settle

Anecdotal in the AG press narrative.

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  2. NY AG — life-size Trump photo anecdote at seminars (2013) Illustrative allegation about expectations of personal appearance; anecdotal in AG narrative.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Steelman: classic consumer fraud pattern

Steelman · Disputed

Labeled stand-in for the New York AG chapter (not a likeness claim).
Labeled stand-in for the New York AG chapter (not a likeness claim). Government-office stand-in portrait slot (not a likeness claim) · Labeled stand-in

Strongest AG/plaintiff reading without inventing a conviction.

Pattern alleged: celebrity ads, false handpicked claims, free bait, credit-limit pressure, Elite prices, weak mentorship delivery, unlicensed “university” branding. [1][2][3][4]

Settlement for $25M with ~80–90% recovery is consistent with serious exposure even without a verdict. [5][6]

Bottom line Disputed

The pattern is why the case mattered — the limit is the missing judgment.

What the record can’t settle

Do not upgrade allegations to “proven in court.”

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  2. NY AG description of ‘handpicked instructors’ advertising claims (2013 press) AG investigation claim that Trump did not handpick instructors; allegation in pleading/press.
  3. NY AG / Makaeff — credit-limit increase pitch at free/3-day events Court opinion and AG both describe credit-limit exhortations tied to Elite purchases.
  4. NY AG — promised year-long apprenticeship support vs delivery Mentorship delivery gap as alleged.
  5. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  6. Ninth Circuit — class recovery ~80–90% of amounts paid Court describes expected recovery band for participants under settlement.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Three-day cancellation rights

Record · Alleged

courthouse — Trump University guide
courthouse — Trump University guide Courthouse exterior pool image (sibling guide re-encode) · Wikimedia / freer license via prior AI Files encode

Federal cooling-off rules alleged ignored.

Schneiderman’s office alleged Trump University repeatedly failed to honor consumers’ timely three-business-day cancellation rights. [1][2]

Bottom line Alleged

A technical consumer-law hook alongside the bigger bait-and-switch story.

What the record can’t settle

Not separately tried to judgment.

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  2. NY AG — alleged failure to honor federal 3-day cancellation rights Consumer-protection allegation; not separately adjudicated to verdict.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Campaign fuse 2015–16

Campaign & Curiel

Judge as issue

Judge Gonzalo Curiel

Record · History

Labeled stand-in for the Curiel/campaign chapter (not a portrait claim).
Labeled stand-in for the Curiel/campaign chapter (not a portrait claim). Judicial stand-in slot (not a likeness of Judge Curiel) · Labeled stand-in from civil-fraud pool

The S.D. Cal. judge who would become a campaign issue.

Curiel presided over the related California class actions heading toward a late-2016 trial. [1][2]

He later entered the April 2018 order making the settlement Final after the objector’s further review rights were waived. [3]

Bottom line History

Same judge from trial calendar through final consummation.

What the record can’t settle

Presiding is not bias; heritage attacks are a separate claim.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  2. AP — Trump’s video testimony won’t appear in attack ads (2016) Curiel declined to release deposition video for campaign ads; summarizes lawsuit pitch allegations.
  3. S.D. Cal. — Order permitting consummation of settlement (Apr 9, 2018) Judge Curiel makes settlement Final after Simpson waives further review.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

“Mexican judge” — the 2016 attacks

Record · Documented

Labeled stand-in for the Curiel/campaign chapter (not a portrait claim).
Labeled stand-in for the Curiel/campaign chapter (not a portrait claim). Judicial stand-in slot (not a likeness of Judge Curiel) · Labeled stand-in from civil-fraud pool

Trump makes Curiel’s heritage a campaign issue.

In June 2016 Reuters and other wires reported Trump defending attacks that tied Curiel’s Mexican heritage to supposed bias in the Trump University cases. [1][2]

POLITICO covered the parallel fight over releasing Trump deposition video clips into the campaign bloodstream. [3][4]

Bottom line Documented

The attacks are documented; a judicial ethics finding of actual bias is not.

What the record can’t settle

Birthplace/heritage press details vary; the bias claim is the contested part.

Sources

  1. Reuters — Trump defends attacks on Mexican-American U.S. federal judge (June 2016) Contemporaneous coverage of Curiel heritage attacks during campaign.
  2. 2016 campaign — Trump University as general-election issue (wire coverage) Frames political afterlife; pair with settlement record.
  3. POLITICO — Trump University lawyers’ political pain / Curiel deposition fight (June 2016) Campaign-season litigation politics around releasing Trump deposition clips.
  4. AP — Trump’s video testimony won’t appear in attack ads (2016) Curiel declined to release deposition video for campaign ads; summarizes lawsuit pitch allegations.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

The deposition video fight

Record · History

courthouse — Trump University guide
courthouse — Trump University guide Courthouse exterior pool image (sibling guide re-encode) · Wikimedia / freer license via prior AI Files encode

Plaintiffs wanted clips public; the court limited campaign use.

AP reported Curiel would not release Trump’s video testimony for attack ads, citing media-frenzy and jury-selection concerns amid the fraud allegations over high-pressure upsells. [1]

POLITICO described plaintiffs’ pressure for dozens of clips during the Curiel controversy. [2]

Bottom line History

Discovery collided with a presidential campaign.

What the record can’t settle

Unreleased clips are not a public transcript substitute.

Sources

  1. AP — Trump’s video testimony won’t appear in attack ads (2016) Curiel declined to release deposition video for campaign ads; summarizes lawsuit pitch allegations.
  2. POLITICO — Trump University lawyers’ political pain / Curiel deposition fight (June 2016) Campaign-season litigation politics around releasing Trump deposition clips.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Trial set for late November 2016

Record · Documented

campaign — Trump University guide
campaign — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

The calendar that met Election Day.

The Ninth Circuit recounts that the California cases were scheduled for trial in late November 2016; Trump was elected November 8; within weeks the parties reached a global settlement. [1][2]

Bottom line Documented

Timing is fact; motive for settling is inference.

What the record can’t settle

Do not treat calendar proximity as proof of a particular bargain.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit background — California trials scheduled late November 2016 Timeline: trial calendar, election Nov 8, settlement within weeks.
  2. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

General-election issue

Record · History

campaign — Trump University guide
campaign — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Trump University leaves the business page for the ballot.

Wire coverage in 2016 treated the lawsuits and Curiel fight as major campaign problems for the Republican nominee. [1][2][3]

Bottom line History

The political afterlife begins before the settlement ink dries.

What the record can’t settle

Issue salience is not a legal outcome.

Sources

  1. Reuters — Trump defends attacks on Mexican-American U.S. federal judge (June 2016) Contemporaneous coverage of Curiel heritage attacks during campaign.
  2. 2016 general-election political use of Trump University (wire/context) Issue salience in campaign season; specific debate lines vary by transcript — cite wires for attacks on Curiel.
  3. 2016 campaign — Trump University as general-election issue (wire coverage) Frames political afterlife; pair with settlement record.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Settle & affirm 2016–18

The $25 million deal

No admission

The $25 million global settlement

Record · Official

The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing.
The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing. Settlement / Ninth Circuit document imagery · Public domain / U.S. court document

$21 million for students, $4 million for New York — December 2016.

On December 19, 2016, the parties settled: a Trump University successor would pay $21 million to class members and defendants would pay $4 million in the NY AG action — $25 million total. [1][2]

The Ninth Circuit called the class terms “highly favorable,” with participants expected to recover roughly 80 to 90 percent of what they paid. [3][1]

Bottom line Official

A very large civil compromise right after the election.

What the record can’t settle

Favorable recovery is not an admission of the AG’s fraud framing.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  2. Trump University class settlement agreement (filed Dec 2016) — Courthouse News reproduction Global civil settlement terms; no admission of wrongdoing; $25M structure.
  3. Ninth Circuit — class recovery ~80–90% of amounts paid Court describes expected recovery band for participants under settlement.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

No admission of wrongdoing

Record · Documented

The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing.
The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing. Settlement / Ninth Circuit document imagery · Public domain / U.S. court document

The clause that memory wars keep forgetting or over-reading.

The Ninth Circuit states flatly that no defendant admitted wrongdoing in the settlement. [1][2]

There was no trial verdict on the fraud claims and no criminal conviction arising from Trump University. [3][4]

Bottom line Documented

Money moved; liability was not adjudicated.

What the record can’t settle

“No admission” also does not prove innocence — it proves non-adjudication.

Sources

  1. Settlement / Ninth Circuit — no admission of wrongdoing Explicit: defendants did not admit wrongdoing; settlement favorable recovery percentages.
  2. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  3. Record limit — no criminal fraud conviction for Trump University Civil settlement posture; absence of criminal judgment is the limit of the yardstick.
  4. AI Files thin nest — Trump University short case Prior short case; becomes gateway after this ship.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

January 2017 — money to escrow

Record · Documented

The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing.
The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing. Settlement / Ninth Circuit document imagery · Public domain / U.S. court document

TEI funds the deal.

Case summaries of the final-approval record state that on January 17, 2017, TEI paid the full $25 million Settlement Amount to the escrow agent, with $4 million distributed to the NY AG and $21 million held for class members. [1][2]

Bottom line Documented

Payment happened — the settlement was not vaporware.

What the record can’t settle

Secondary case digests; align with court docket declarations when available.

Sources

  1. Jan 17, 2017 — TEI pays full $25M to escrow (case summaries) Secondary but consistent with final-approval record; $4M to NYAG, $21M invested for class.
  2. Courthouse News / gno.law summary — Low settlement final approval posture Secondary case summary noting Jan 17, 2017 escrow payment of full $25M.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

The lone objector — Sherri Simpson

Record · Official

courthouse — Trump University guide
courthouse — Trump University guide Courthouse exterior pool image (sibling guide re-encode) · Wikimedia / freer license via prior AI Files encode

One objector tried to blow up the deal for a second opt-out.

Sherri Simpson sought to opt out at the settlement stage and pursue her own suit; she had already received class-certification opt-out notice and declined. [1][2]

The Ninth Circuit held neither the notice nor due process required a second opt-out chance and affirmed. [2][3]

Bottom line Official

The settlement survived its appellate stress test.

What the record can’t settle

Objector motives vary; the holding is procedural.

Sources

  1. Sherri Simpson objector appeal — Low v. Trump University Lone objector sought second opt-out; Ninth Circuit rejects notice/due-process theories.
  2. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  3. FindLaw text — Simpson v. Trump University (9th Cir. 2018) HTML mirror of Ninth Circuit affirmance for searchable quotes.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Ninth Circuit affirms — Feb 6, 2018

Record · Official

Ninth Circuit materials and the Trump University settlement endgame.
Ninth Circuit materials and the Trump University settlement endgame. Ninth Circuit opinion first page / nest asset (public court document crop) · Public domain / U.S. court opinion

Low v. Trump University keeps the deal intact.

In a published opinion, Judge Nguyen’s panel affirmed the district court’s approval of the settlement over Simpson’s objections. [1]

The opinion is also the cleanest short narrative of the three coordinated suits and the post-election settlement. [2][1]

Bottom line Official

Appellate finality on approval — the key legal endgame before consummation.

What the record can’t settle

Affirming fairness of a settlement is not affirming the truth of every allegation.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  2. Ninth Circuit — two S.D. Cal. class actions + NY AG state suit during 2016 Litigation map for global settlement.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

April 9, 2018 — settlement Final

Record · Official

The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing.
The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing. Settlement / Ninth Circuit document imagery · Public domain / U.S. court document

Curiel orders consummation; Schneiderman claims victory.

Judge Curiel granted a joint motion permitting consummation after Simpson waived further review, declaring the settlement Final. [1]

AG Schneiderman’s statement called victims of a “fraudulent university” finally relieved — advocacy language atop court finality. [2]

Bottom line Official

Civil end of the road.

What the record can’t settle

Separate the court’s Final order from the AG’s rhetorical framing.

Sources

  1. S.D. Cal. — Order permitting consummation of settlement (Apr 9, 2018) Judge Curiel makes settlement Final after Simpson waives further review.
  2. NY AG Schneiderman — Statement on final Trump University settlement (Apr 9, 2018) AG framing of ‘fraudulent university’ and finalization; advocacy language alongside court finality.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

80–90 percent recovery band

Record · Documented

The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing.
The $25 million civil settlement — no admission of wrongdoing. Settlement / Ninth Circuit document imagery · Public domain / U.S. court document

Why courts called the deal “highly favorable.”

The Ninth Circuit highlighted expected recovery of about 80 to 90 percent of amounts students paid for Trump University programs. [1][2]

That percentage is central to fairness analysis — and to later arguments that students were made nearly whole without a trial. [3]

Bottom line Documented

Unusually high civil recovery rates for a consumer class.

What the record can’t settle

Individual checks still depended on claims administration.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit — class recovery ~80–90% of amounts paid Court describes expected recovery band for participants under settlement.
  2. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  3. Trump University class settlement agreement (filed Dec 2016) — Courthouse News reproduction Global civil settlement terms; no admission of wrongdoing; $25M structure.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Why settle after Election Day?

Record · Debated

campaign — Trump University guide
campaign — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Calendar facts vs motive stories.

Documented: trial set late November 2016; election November 8; settlement December 19. [1][2]

Inferences — bury a trial, presidential optics, litigation fatigue — are argued by camps and are not findings in the settlement papers. [3][4]

Bottom line Debated

Timing is hard; teleology is soft.

What the record can’t settle

This page marks motive claims as debated.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit background — California trials scheduled late November 2016 Timeline: trial calendar, election Nov 8, settlement within weeks.
  2. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  3. Settlement / Ninth Circuit — no admission of wrongdoing Explicit: defendants did not admit wrongdoing; settlement favorable recovery percentages.
  4. Trump University class settlement agreement (filed Dec 2016) — Courthouse News reproduction Global civil settlement terms; no admission of wrongdoing; $25M structure.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

What the $4 million to New York was for

Record · Partly true

Labeled stand-in for the New York AG chapter (not a likeness claim).
Labeled stand-in for the New York AG chapter (not a likeness claim). Government-office stand-in portrait slot (not a likeness claim) · Labeled stand-in

AG share inside the global deal.

Secondary settlement summaries describe the $4 million to New York as available for student reimbursement and, if funds remained, costs/penalties related to Trump University. [1][2]

Prefer the filed agreement PDF for operative allocation language. [2]

Bottom line Partly true

NY’s slice was real; exact residual uses need the agreement text.

What the record can’t settle

Secondary digests may simplify trust accounting.

Sources

  1. Quackwatch — Lawsuits against Trump University settled (summary) Secondary overview of $21M/$4M split and NY restitution use; prefer court PDFs for terms.
  2. Trump University class settlement agreement (filed Dec 2016) — Courthouse News reproduction Global civil settlement terms; no admission of wrongdoing; $25M structure.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Memory wars 2018–26

Political afterlife

Fraud vs settled

No criminal fraud conviction

Record · Documented

memory — Trump University guide
memory — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

The hard stop on “he was convicted of fraud.”

The public record of Trump University ends in civil settlement and appellate affirmance, not a criminal judgment. [1][2][3]

Bottom line Documented

Saying “convicted” for Trump University is false; saying “settled fraud claims” is careful.

What the record can’t settle

Absence of criminal case is not a certificate of innocence.

Sources

  1. Record limit — no criminal fraud conviction for Trump University Civil settlement posture; absence of criminal judgment is the limit of the yardstick.
  2. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  3. AI Files thin nest — Trump University short case Prior short case; becomes gateway after this ship.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Fraud university vs settled business dispute

Record · Mixed

memory — Trump University guide
memory — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

How camps talk past the docket.

Opponents collapse the AG’s “sham/fraudulent university” language into a vernacular conviction; Trump allies stress no admission and no verdict. [1][2][3]

The mainstream yardstick keeps both halves: serious settled civil claims with high recovery, without an adjudicated fraud finding. [4][5]

Bottom line Mixed

Memory split is the lasting political product.

What the record can’t settle

This entry is interpretive framing bounded by the docket.

Sources

  1. NY AG Schneiderman — Statement on final Trump University settlement (Apr 9, 2018) AG framing of ‘fraudulent university’ and finalization; advocacy language alongside court finality.
  2. Settlement / Ninth Circuit — no admission of wrongdoing Explicit: defendants did not admit wrongdoing; settlement favorable recovery percentages.
  3. Post-settlement Trump / allies framing — settled without admitting wrongdoing No-admission clause is the primary textual hook; political gloss is secondary.
  4. Ninth Circuit — Low v. Trump University, No. 17-55635 (Feb 6, 2018) Affirms settlement approval; recounts free-workshop → 3-day → mentorship pitch; $21M class + $4M NYAG; no admission; objector Simpson denied second opt-out.
  5. AI Files thin nest — Trump University short case Prior short case; becomes gateway after this ship.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Not the same as NY civil fraud

Record · History

memory — Trump University guide
memory — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Trump University is not the Engoron asset-valuation case.

The AI Files keeps a separate full guide for New York’s later civil-fraud action over asset valuations; Trump University is the seminar/settlement spine. [1][2]

Bottom line History

Do not merge distinct dockets because both say “fraud” in headlines.

What the record can’t settle

Cross-link only.

Sources

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Foundation nest is separate

Record · History

memory — Trump University guide
memory — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Charity disputes are a different file.

The Trump Foundation short nest covers charity/politics issues; it is not rebuilt here. [1][2]

Bottom line History

Pointer, not a merge.

What the record can’t settle

Thin nest may itself later expand.

Sources

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Steelman: buyer’s remorse business

Steelman · Disputed

Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image).
Live Events upsell atmosphere (pool image). Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Strongest defense reading without erasing SED or the settlement.

Defense-compatible facts: adult education and seminars are legal; many businesses settle to end cost/risk; the deal included no admission; recovery was high. [1][2][3]

What the steelman still must face: SED’s naming/licensing record, detailed AG/plaintiff upsell allegations, and Trump’s choice to settle on the eve of a presidency rather than try the case. [4][5][6]

Bottom line Disputed

A fair defense stresses non-adjudication — not “exoneration.”

What the record can’t settle

Steelman is not a verdict.

Sources

  1. Settlement / Ninth Circuit — no admission of wrongdoing Explicit: defendants did not admit wrongdoing; settlement favorable recovery percentages.
  2. Ninth Circuit — class recovery ~80–90% of amounts paid Court describes expected recovery band for participants under settlement.
  3. Sexton declaration — Live Events teaching model (Cohen cert) Defense-side description of free preview → 3-day → additional programs.
  4. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 (1st Dept) Appellate chronology of SED May 2005 letter, 2010 rename to TEI, Sexton Oct 2010 cease-operations notice; useful for licensing spine.
  5. NY AG Schneiderman — Suit against Trump, Trump University & Michael Sexton (Aug 25, 2013) Alleges ~$40M from 5,000+ consumers 2005–2011; handpicked-instructor ads; Elite upsell; SED licensing; seeks restitution — allegations, not a verdict.
  6. Ninth Circuit background — California trials scheduled late November 2016 Timeline: trial calendar, election Nov 8, settlement within weeks.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

How many students actually lost money?

Question · Unproven

memory — Trump University guide
memory — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Class size is known; net harm distribution is messier.

Thousands were in certified classes and the settlement aimed at high percentage recovery, but public sources do not give a clean audited census of profitable vs ruined students. [1][2][3]

Bottom line Unproven

Open empirical question inside a settled case.

What the record can’t settle

Survey snippets in advocacy are not a substitute census.

Sources

  1. Ninth Circuit — classes of over eight thousand students certified Court’s description of certified California classes.
  2. Ninth Circuit — class recovery ~80–90% of amounts paid Court describes expected recovery band for participants under settlement.
  3. AI Files thin nest — Trump University short case Prior short case; becomes gateway after this ship.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

What the short case already said

Record · History

memory — Trump University guide
memory — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Prior AI Files nest: $25M, no admission, no trial verdict.

The maintained short nest already framed the core: not a university, not a fraud conviction, settlement without wrongdoing admission, Ninth Circuit affirmance. [1]

Bottom line History

This full guide deepens that spine rather than reversing it.

What the record can’t settle

Short-case brevity omitted SED and Curiel detail now covered.

Sources

  1. AI Files thin nest — Trump University short case Prior short case; becomes gateway after this ship.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Yardstick limits

Record · Documented

memory — Trump University guide
memory — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

What this guide will not pretend the record shows.

No criminal conviction; no jury fraud verdict; no admission of wrongdoing; SED naming/licensing violations and a large civil settlement with high expected recovery. [1][2][3][4]

Bottom line Documented

Those four clauses are the whole adult summary.

What the record can’t settle

Newer political rhetoric does not rewrite 2018 finality.

Sources

  1. Record limit — no criminal fraud conviction for Trump University Civil settlement posture; absence of criminal judgment is the limit of the yardstick.
  2. Settlement / Ninth Circuit — no admission of wrongdoing Explicit: defendants did not admit wrongdoing; settlement favorable recovery percentages.
  3. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 (1st Dept) Appellate chronology of SED May 2005 letter, 2010 rename to TEI, Sexton Oct 2010 cease-operations notice; useful for licensing spine.
  4. Ninth Circuit — class recovery ~80–90% of amounts paid Court describes expected recovery band for participants under settlement.

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide

Under The Trump Files

Record · History

memory — Trump University guide
memory — Trump University guide Freely licensed / re-encoded pool image from AI Files sibling guides · Re-encoded; EXIF stripped

Nest-only full guide — no homepage peer card.

This topic ships as a full illustrated guide linked from the Trump hub’s Full guides section, with the old short URL kept as a maintained-record gateway. [1][2]

Bottom line History

Collection architecture, not a legal finding.

What the record can’t settle

Catalog homepage peers are reserved for top-level files.

Sources

Back to contents · Open in the interactive guide