Donald Trump.

The AI Files · Stormy Daniels, AMI catch-and-kill, Michael Cohen, and the Manhattan conviction · 2016–2026

Hush money

A jury found 34 false records. The judge imposed no jail, fine or probation. The appeal is set for argument in November 2026.

Between those facts sits a decade of argument: election crime, bookkeeping misdemeanor, political prosecution, open-and-shut cover-up. This guide follows the documented chain—from AMI catch-and-kill through Cohen’s plea, Bragg’s indictment, the trial, the discharge and the App. Div. fight—and sets each theory against that chain. It does not cover foreign wars.

Read the story Explore the files

Donald Trump. Image: Shealeah Craighead · Public domain

The story

The story of the hush-money case, from the beginning

From the 2015 Trump Tower meeting and 2016 payments through the false 2017 records, Cohen’s plea, the Manhattan trial, the unconditional discharge and the appeal. Every fact is tied to a source. What is charged, pleaded, convicted or still only alleged is labeled as such.

Trump Tower, New York City.
Trump Tower, New York City. Kidfly182 · CC BY 4.0

Chapter 1

A payment, a paper trail, and a novel felony

Paying for silence is not, by itself, what a Manhattan jury convicted Donald Trump of in May 2024. [1] [2] The judgment names thirty-four felony counts of falsifying business records—invoices, ledger entries and checks that prosecutors said disguised repayment of Michael Cohen’s $130,000 wire to Stormy Daniels. [3] [4]

The fight that followed is about whether those records, plus an election-law conspiracy theory, make felonies—or whether a misdemeanor bookkeeping dispute was inflated for politics. [5] [6] Both things can be argued from the same folders. This guide follows the folders.

National Enquirer / AMI context
National Enquirer / AMI context Blastoids · CC BY-SA 3.0

Chapter 2

Eyes and ears at Trump Tower

In August 2015, American Media Inc. chief David Pecker met Trump and Cohen at Trump Tower and offered to be the campaign’s eyes and ears—to tip them to damaging stories and, when useful, to buy those stories so they never ran. [7] [8] That is catch-and-kill as political favor: not a newspaper scoop, a burial.

AMI’s later non-prosecution agreement admitted the McDougal version of that pattern. [9] The meeting is the prologue every serious account needs.

2016 U.S. presidential election context.
2016 U.S. presidential election context. Gage · CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)

Chapter 3

Karen McDougal and the unpublished story

In summer 2016 AMI paid about $150,000 for the rights to Karen McDougal’s account of an alleged affair with Trump and did not publish it. [9] [10] The Wall Street Journal surfaced the arrangement that November. [10]

McDougal’s deal is not one of the thirty-four Manhattan counts. It is the proof-of-concept for the machine that next touched Stormy Daniels. [9] [3]

Stormy Daniels
Stormy Daniels Toglenn · CC BY-SA 3.0

Chapter 4

Access Hollywood, then a wire

On 7 October 2016 the Access Hollywood tape hit. [11] Twenty days later, Cohen’s Essential Consultants LLC wired $130,000 to Daniels’s counsel for a nondisclosure agreement. [12] [13]

Prosecutors treat that calendar as motive in neon. [4] Defense lawyers treat motive as a story that still has to meet statutory elements. [5] The date of the wire is not in dispute.

Michael Cohen
Michael Cohen JakeLately · CC0

Chapter 5

What the NDA was—and was not

The agreement bought silence. It did not charge a sex crime. Trump has long denied the 2006 encounter Daniels later described under oath. [14] [15]

Readers who collapse “hush money,” “affair,” and “felony” into one insult are doing politics, not reading the indictment. [3] [3]

U.S. Department of Justice building.
U.S. Department of Justice building. APK · CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Chapter 6

Reimbursements dressed as legal fees

In 2017 the Trump Organization booked a string of payments to Cohen as legal expenses under a retainer the state said did not exist for that work. [3] [16] Eleven invoices, twelve ledger entries, eleven checks—thirty-four records. [1]

Some checks bore Trump’s signature. [3] That paper trail is why “Cohen invented everything” never quite fits as a total theory. [16]

Alvin Bragg
Alvin Bragg CmdrDan · CC BY-SA 4.0

Chapter 7

The federal fork: Cohen pleads, Trump does not

SDNY searched Cohen in April 2018. [17] In August he pleaded guilty to campaign-finance and other counts tied to the hush payments. [13] AMI entered a non-prosecution agreement admitting catch-and-kill coordination. [9]

Trump was not federally charged. [13] That absence is rocket fuel for both “the feds knew it was thin” and “Manhattan filled a gap with a stretch”—choose your podcast. [5]

Judge Merchan
Judge Merchan SWinxy · CC BY 4.0

Chapter 8

Bragg’s thirty-four felonies

On 4 April 2023 Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicted Trump—the first indictment of a former U.S. president. [3] [18] The elevation from misdemeanor records crime to felony ran through intent to commit or conceal another crime: a New York election-law conspiracy to promote a candidacy by unlawful means. [2] [19] [4]

That hinge is the case’s brain stem. Cut it on appeal and the felony judgments shake. [5] [20]

New York County Courthouse
New York County Courthouse Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0

Chapter 9

Trial: publishers, porn stars, and a fixer

April and May 2024 brought Pecker, Daniels, Cohen, finance clerks, and a gag order that produced contempt fines. [7] [14] [16] [21] Justice Juan Merchan told jurors they must unanimously find the election conspiracy—but need not agree which unlawful means (federal campaign finance, tax, or more false records) did the work. [4]

Viral posts that call the verdict “non-unanimous” are misreading those pages. [4]

Donald Trump at the White House.
Donald Trump at the White House. The White House · Public domain

Chapter 10

Guilty on every count

On 30 May 2024 the jury convicted on all thirty-four counts. [1] [22] Trump became the first former president with a criminal conviction. [18]

Sentencing slid past the 2024 election. History’s milestone and the law’s finality are not the same clock. [23]

Donald Trump.
Donald Trump. Shealeah Craighead · Public domain

Chapter 11

Immunity arrives after the verdict

On 1 July 2024 the Supreme Court decided Trump v. United States, reshaping official-acts immunity. [24] Defense briefs later argued some trial evidence—aide testimony, certain posts—should never have been before the jury. [5]

Prosecutors call any such slice incidental to a private scheme. [6] The argument is live; it is not a wand that already erased May 30.

New York County Courthouse
New York County Courthouse Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0

Chapter 12

Unconditional discharge

On 10 January 2025 Merchan imposed no jail, no fine, no probation—an unconditional discharge—while leaving the felony conviction in place. [23] [25] “No punishment” is fair English for the sanctions. “No conviction” is false. [25]

A federal pardon would not wipe a New York judgment anyway. [26]

U.S. Department of Justice building.
U.S. Department of Justice building. APK · CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Chapter 13

The Appellate Division file opens

In late October 2025 Trump’s lawyers filed their opening brief in the Appellate Division, First Department (No. 2025-00648): preemption, immunity, instructions, recusal. [5] [27] The United States filed an amicus supporting the appellant—an eyebrow-raising alignment. [28] [29]

Scholars filed too, including critiques of the elevation theory. [20] [30]

Alvin Bragg
Alvin Bragg CmdrDan · CC BY-SA 4.0

Chapter 14

Parallel track: try for federal court

Trump also sought to yank the already-tried case into federal court. The Second Circuit remanded for another look in November 2025. [31] On 28 August 2026 Judge Alvin Hellerstein again said no, calling the hush-money conduct private. [32] [33]

Removal headlines are not merits reversals. [33]

New York County Courthouse
New York County Courthouse Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0

Chapter 15

Prosecutors answer; the reply lands

On 29 July 2026 the Manhattan DA urged affirmance: unofficial conduct, overwhelming evidence. [6] The defense reply brief is dated 16 October 2026 on annotated dockets. [29]

Paper war complete. Calendar next.

National Enquirer / AMI context
National Enquirer / AMI context Blastoids · CC BY-SA 3.0

Chapter 16

November 5, 2026: argument day set

The New York Sun reported—and docket annotators list—oral argument on 5 November 2026 at 2 p.m. [34] [29] As of this edition there is no App. Div. opinion wiping or affirming the convictions.

Anyone already celebrating erasure is early. Anyone calling the appeal frivolous has not read the amici. [5] [28]

Michael Cohen
Michael Cohen JakeLately · CC0

Chapter 17

Catch-and-kill as a method, not a vibe

AMI’s admissions and Pecker’s testimony make catch-and-kill a documented method: buy rights, bury text, help a candidate. [9] [7] Method is not automatically a Manhattan felony. The felonies attach where New York law says false records plus elevating intent meet. [2]

Keep the journalism word and the statute word on separate hooks.

Donald Trump.
Donald Trump. Shealeah Craighead · Public domain

Chapter 18

Credibility without fairy tales

Cohen lied before; he also produced a wire, invoices, and a federal plea. [13] [16] Daniels’s account is contested by Trump and central to public memory. [14] Juries weigh such messes under instructions; appeals weigh whether the law allowed the weigh-in. [4] [5]

The critical path below is how this guide keeps those layers from dissolving into team chants.

The critical path — 16 steps

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set

View the critical path · See Theories

New York County Courthouse
New York County Courthouse Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0

Chapter 19

How to walk the critical path

Sixteen links carry the mainstream account from the Tower meeting to a scheduled appellate argument. Theories that deny the wire, invent a completed reversal, or pretend the counts have no name break the chain. Theories that attack elevation, immunity, or bias usually **reinterpret** links rather than erase the payment trail—and they must say what new holding they need. [#path]

The critical path — 16 steps

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set

View the critical path · See Theories

Chapter 20

Path tease — sixteen steps

**1.** Eyes-and-ears meeting (Aug 2015). [7] · **2.** McDougal catch-and-kill. [9] · **3.** Access Hollywood (7 Oct 2016). [11] · **4.** Cohen’s $130,000 wire (27 Oct 2016). [12] · **5.** 2017 reimbursements as “legal fees.” [3] · **6.** Cohen raid (Apr 2018). [17] · **7.** Cohen FECA plea. [13] · **8.** AMI NPA. [9] · **9.** Bragg’s 34-count indictment (Apr 2023). [3] · **10.** Trial evidence (Pecker/Daniels/Cohen). [1] · **11.** Instructions on the election predicate. [4] · **12.** Guilty on all counts (30 May 2024). [1] · **13.** SCOTUS immunity decision (1 Jul 2024). [24] · **14.** Unconditional discharge (10 Jan 2025). [23] · **15.** Appeal briefing (2025–26). [5] [6] · **16.** Removal denied again; argument set for 5 Nov 2026. [32] [34]

Open the critical path panel to score each major theory against those steps. [#path]

Sources for the story
  1. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  2. N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10 — Falsifying business records in the first degree
  3. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
  4. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
  5. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  6. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
  7. Trial coverage: David Pecker testimony on catch-and-kill (April 2024)
  8. AP: Trump hush money trial — a timeline of key events
  9. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
  10. Wall Street Journal: National Enquirer hid Trump affairs stories (Nov. 4, 2016) — McDougal reporting
  11. Washington Post: Trump recorded in 2005 discussing women (Access Hollywood) — Oct. 7, 2016
  12. Wall Street Journal: Trump lawyer arranged $130,000 payment (Jan. 12, 2018)
  13. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  14. Trial coverage: Stormy Daniels testimony (May 2024)
  15. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
  16. Trial coverage: Michael Cohen testimony (May 2024)
  17. NYT: FBI raids office of Trump’s longtime lawyer Michael Cohen (April 2018)
  18. NYT: Trump guilty on all counts in hush-money case (May 30, 2024)
  19. N.Y. Election Law § 17-152 — Conspiracy to promote/prevent election by unlawful means
  20. Jed Shugerman amicus supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div. Jan./Sept. 2026)
  21. Coverage of Justice Merchan gag order during 2024 trial
  22. CNN: Trump becomes first former U.S. president convicted of felony crimes
  23. AP: Excerpts from the January 10, 2025 sentencing
  24. Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) — presidential immunity
  25. Justice Merchan sentencing decision (Jan. 3, 2025) — 2025 NY Slip Op 30014
  26. N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law — unconditional discharge explained in sentencing coverage
  27. ABC: Trump formally appeals his New York hush money conviction (Oct 28, 2025)
  28. Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div., Nov. 2025)
  29. New Reform Club: People v. Trump briefs and filings (App. Div. 1st Dept. 2025-00648)
  30. Tillman & Landmark Legal amicus (App. Div. Oct. 29, 2025)
  31. 2d Cir. remand on removal (Nov. 6, 2025) — People v. Trump, 158 F.4th 458
  32. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93
  33. AP: Trump loses again in bid to erase his hush money conviction (Aug. 28, 2026)
  34. New York Sun: Oral argument set for November 5, 2026

Explore

Go deeper, era by era

Pick an era, or search everything at once: entries, people, dated events, claims, theories and media.

Threads

Follow one thread through the whole story

Each thread pulls together the entries on one question, across all the eras.

Key people

Who was who

Principals, lawyers, publishers, prosecutors and the judge who appear in the record.

Donald J. TrumpDonald J. TrumpDefendant; 45th and 47th U.S. president

Convicted on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records; received unconditional discharge; appeal pending.

Sources
  1. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  2. AP: Excerpts from the January 10, 2025 sentencing
  3. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
Stormy Daniels (Stephanie Clifford)Stormy Daniels (Stephanie Clifford)NDA counterpart; trial witness

Received $130,000 via Cohen for a nondisclosure agreement; testified to an alleged 2006 encounter Trump denies.

Sources
  1. Wall Street Journal: Trump lawyer arranged $130,000 payment (Jan. 12, 2018)
  2. Trial coverage: Stormy Daniels testimony (May 2024)
Michael CohenMichael CohenFormer Trump lawyer; SDNY convict; star witness

Wired the Daniels payment; pleaded guilty federally; testified Trump directed reimbursements.

Sources
  1. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  2. Trial coverage: Michael Cohen testimony (May 2024)
Karen McDougalKaren McDougalAMI catch-and-kill subject

Sold story rights to AMI for about $150,000; story unpublished.

Sources
  1. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
  2. Wall Street Journal: National Enquirer hid Trump affairs stories (Nov. 4, 2016) — McDougal reporting
David PeckerDavid PeckerFormer AMI / National Enquirer CEO

Offered to be campaign eyes and ears; testified to catch-and-kill; AMI entered NPA.

Sources
  1. Trial coverage: David Pecker testimony on catch-and-kill (April 2024)
  2. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
Allen WeisselbergAllen WeisselbergFormer Trump Organization CFO

Described in testimony as helping structure grossed-up reimbursements to Cohen.

Sources
  1. Trial coverage: Michael Cohen testimony (May 2024)
  2. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
Keith DavidsonKeith DavidsonDaniels’s counsel on the NDA

Negotiated the nondisclosure agreement funded by Cohen’s wire.

Sources
  1. Wall Street Journal: Trump lawyer arranged $130,000 payment (Jan. 12, 2018)
  2. AP: Trump hush money trial — a timeline of key events
Alvin BraggAlvin BraggManhattan District Attorney

Office that indicted and tried the 34-count case and defends it on appeal.

Sources
  1. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
  2. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  3. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
Cyrus Vance Jr.Cyrus Vance Jr.Former Manhattan DA

Predecessor whose office investigated Trump Organization matters before Bragg charged the hush-money case.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Juan MerchanJuan MerchanActing Justice, NY Supreme Court; trial judge

Presided over trial, gag order, verdict and unconditional discharge; recusal is an appeal issue.

Sources
  1. Justice Merchan sentencing decision (Jan. 3, 2025) — 2025 NY Slip Op 30014
  2. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
  3. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
Alvin K. HellersteinAlvin K. HellersteinU.S. District Judge, SDNY

Twice denied Trump’s bid to remove the state case to federal court; Aug. 28, 2026 opinion.

Sources
  1. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93
  2. AP: Trump loses again in bid to erase his hush money conviction (Aug. 28, 2026)
Hope HicksHope HicksFormer campaign/White House aide; trial witness

Testified to campaign concern after Access Hollywood.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
  2. AP: Trump hush money trial — a timeline of key events
Todd BlancheTodd BlancheLead trial counsel; later DOJ role

Led Trump’s trial defense before moving into the second-term Justice Department.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Emil BoveEmil BoveTrial/appeal counsel; later DOJ role

Defense lawyer noted in timelines before administration roles.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Susan HoffingerSusan HoffingerManhattan DA prosecutor

Senior prosecutor on the hush-money trial team (office advocacy).

Sources
  1. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  2. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Joshua SteinglassJoshua SteinglassManhattan DA prosecutor

Delivered major portions of the state’s trial presentation.

Sources
  1. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  2. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Matthew ColangeloMatthew ColangeloProsecutor on the case team

Former DOJ official who joined Bragg’s office and worked the Trump case—a defense talking point about federal-to-state continuity.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
  2. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
Robert CostelloRobert CostelloDefense witness; Cohen antagonist

Called to attack Cohen’s credibility; courtroom clashes with the bench became part of trial lore.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Jeffrey McConneyJeffrey McConneyFormer Trump Org controller

Finance witness on how invoices and checks were processed.

Sources
  1. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
  2. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
Deborah TarasoffDeborah TarasoffTrump Org accounts-payable clerk

Testified to the mechanics of cutting reimbursement checks.

Sources
  1. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  2. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Gary FarroGary FarroFirst Republic banker

Testified about Cohen’s home-equity line used to fund the Daniels payment.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
  2. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
Dylan HowardDylan HowardFormer AMI editor

AMI editorial figure in catch-and-kill reporting and NPA narrative.

Sources
  1. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
  2. Wall Street Journal: National Enquirer hid Trump affairs stories (Nov. 4, 2016) — McDougal reporting
Melania TrumpMelania TrumpFirst Lady (mentioned in motive evidence)

Prosecutors argued concealment aimed partly at personal/family political damage; she was not a trial witness on the counts.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
  2. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
Letitia JamesLetitia JamesNY Attorney General (parallel civil context)

Not the hush-money prosecutor; appears in public memory as part of the broader NY legal pressure narrative.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
John SauerJohn SauerTrump lawyer; later Solicitor General role noted in timelines

Named among lawyers transitioning into administration posts as appeal counsel shifted.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Seth Barrett TillmanSeth Barrett TillmanAmicus scholar

Co-author of an App. Div. amicus supporting the defendant-appellant.

Sources
  1. Tillman & Landmark Legal amicus (App. Div. Oct. 29, 2025)
Jed Handelsman ShugermanJed Handelsman ShugermanAmicus scholar

Filed amicus criticizing the legal theory elevating the records counts.

Sources
  1. Jed Shugerman amicus supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div. Jan./Sept. 2026)
Pam BondiPam BondiU.S. Attorney General (2025–)

Issued weaponization-review directives after taking office; political frame, not App. Div. ruling.

Sources
  1. ABC timeline: AG Bondi ‘Weaponization Working Group’ directive (Feb. 2025)
  2. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Mark PomerantzMark PomerantzFormer Vance prosecutor

Resigned and later wrote about pressure to charge Trump—part of the pre-Bragg history.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Carey R. DunneCarey R. DunneFormer Vance counsel

Senior figure in the earlier Manhattan investigation phase.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Donald Trump Jr.Donald Trump Jr.Family / political surrogate

Public defender of his father during trial; not a elements witness.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Alina HabbaAlina HabbaTrump attorney (broader litigation)

Frequent public surrogate during the criminal cases era.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Joe TacopinaJoe TacopinaEarly defense counsel

Represented Trump in earlier phases before the Blanche trial team.

Sources
  1. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case

Timeline

Day by day

31 dated events, 2016–2026, each with its source.

  1. Aug 2015
    Trump Tower eyes-and-ears meeting Pecker offers AMI help killing damaging stories for the campaign. Catch-and-kill · source source
  2. Aug 2016
    AMI buys McDougal’s story About $150,000; story never published. Catch-and-kill · source source
  3. 7 Oct 2016
    Access Hollywood tape published Campaign crisis days before the Daniels payment. Catch-and-kill · source
  4. 27 Oct 2016
    Cohen wires Daniels $130,000 Essential Consultants funds the NDA. The $130,000 payment · source source
  5. 8 Nov 2016
    Trump wins the presidency Payment story still largely unknown to voters. The $130,000 payment · source
  6. 2017
    Monthly reimbursements booked as legal fees Invoices, ledgers and checks later charged as 34 false records. The false records · source
  7. 4 Nov 2016
    WSJ reports AMI hid Trump stories McDougal catch-and-kill reaches national print. Catch-and-kill · source
  8. 12 Jan 2018
    WSJ reports Cohen’s $130,000 payment Daniels payment becomes mainstream news. The $130,000 payment · source
  9. 9 Apr 2018
    FBI raids Cohen SDNY seizes payment records. Federal plea track · source
  10. 21 Aug 2018
    Cohen guilty plea FECA and other counts; Trump not charged federally. Federal plea track · source
  11. Sep 2018
    AMI non-prosecution agreement Corporate admissions on catch-and-kill. Federal plea track · source
  12. Dec 2018
    Cohen sentenced to prison Federal sentence on the plea counts. Federal plea track · source
  13. 2019–2021
    Manhattan DA investigation continues Vance office pursues Trump Organization matters. Manhattan indictment · source
  14. Jan 2022
    Alvin Bragg becomes Manhattan DA Inherited investigation; later files hush-money charges. Manhattan indictment · source
  15. 4 Apr 2023
    Bragg indictment — 34 counts First indictment of a former U.S. president. Manhattan indictment · source
  16. 4 Apr 2023
    Arraignment in Manhattan Not-guilty plea enters. Manhattan indictment · source
  17. 15 Apr 2024
    Trial opens Jury selection and opening statements begin the public trial. The trial · source
  18. Apr 2024
    Pecker testifies Catch-and-kill prologue for the jury. The trial · source
  19. May 2024
    Daniels testifies Alleged encounter and NDA path. The trial · source
  20. May 2024
    Cohen testifies Says Trump directed payment and repayments. The trial · source
  21. 23 May 2024
    Jury instructions finalized Elevation theory and unanimity rules set. The trial · source
  22. 30 May 2024
    Guilty on all 34 counts First conviction of a former U.S. president. The trial · source source
  23. 1 Jul 2024
    SCOTUS immunity decision Trump v. United States reshapes later appeal arguments. 2026 aftermath · source
  24. 5 Nov 2024
    Trump wins 2024 election Sentencing still pending. Sentence and appeal · source
  25. 10 Jan 2025
    Unconditional discharge No jail, fine or probation; conviction stands. Sentence and appeal · source source
  26. 27–28 Oct 2025
    Defense appeal brief filed App. Div. 1st Dept. No. 2025-00648. Sentence and appeal · source source
  27. 6 Nov 2025
    Second Circuit remands removal Hellerstein must reconsider federal forum issues. 2026 aftermath · source
  28. 29 Jul 2026
    DA respondent brief Prosecutors urge affirmance. Sentence and appeal · source
  29. 28 Aug 2026
    Hellerstein denies removal again Private-conduct finding; conviction untouched. 2026 aftermath · source source
  30. 16 Oct 2026
    Defense reply brief Briefing complete ahead of argument. Sentence and appeal · source
  31. 5 Nov 2026
    Oral argument set (2 p.m.) App. Div. 1st Department calendars the appeal. 2026 aftermath · source source

What we know now

What we know now

The conviction stands. Briefs are in. Oral argument before the Appellate Division, First Department, is set for 5 November 2026. Federal removal was denied again in August 2026.

The yardstick

The critical path

The chain of links the established account needs. Theories are scored against these steps.

  1. 1
    Aug 20151. Eyes-and-ears meeting

    In August 2015 at Trump Tower, AMI’s David Pecker offers to be the campaign’s eyes and ears and to kill damaging stories—later trial testimony and AMI’s NPA admissions.[1][2][3]

    On the timeline
  2. 2
    Aug 20162. McDougal catch-and-kill

    AMI pays about $150,000 for Karen McDougal’s story of an alleged affair and does not publish it; coordination with Cohen is admitted in the AMI NPA.[2][4][3]

    On the timeline
  3. 3
    7 Oct 20163. Access Hollywood tape

    On 7 October 2016 the Access Hollywood recording is published, intensifying campaign risk around women’s allegations.[5][3]

    On the timeline
  4. 4
    27 Oct 20164. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000

    On 27 October 2016 Cohen wires $130,000 through Essential Consultants for a nondisclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels.[6][7][3]

    On the timeline
  5. 5
    20175. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees

    Trump Organization invoices, ledger entries and checks record monthly payments to Cohen as legal expenses under a retainer the prosecution said did not exist—34 records.[8][9][10]

    On the timeline
  6. 6
    9 Apr 20186. Cohen raid and federal case

    April 2018 SDNY searches of Cohen produce payment records that become the federal case.[11][7]

    On the timeline
  7. 7
    21 Aug 20187. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)

    On 21 August 2018 Cohen pleads guilty in SDNY to campaign-finance and other counts tied to the hush payments; Trump is not charged federally.[7][12]

    On the timeline
  8. 8
    Sep 20188. AMI non-prosecution agreement

    AMI admits catch-and-kill coordination and avoids prosecution under an NPA.[2]

    On the timeline
  9. 9
    4 Apr 20239. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies

    On 4 April 2023 Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg charges Trump with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, elevated via intent to commit/conceal another crime.[8][13][10]

    On the timeline
  10. 10
    15 Apr 202410. Trial evidence

    April–May 2024 trial features Pecker, Daniels and Cohen; defense attacks credibility and legal theory.[1][14][15][16]

    On the timeline
  11. 11
    23 May 202411. Jury instructions on the predicate

    Instructions require unanimity that Trump conspired to promote his election by unlawful means, but not on which means (FECA, tax, or other false records).[9]

    On the timeline
  12. 12
    30 May 202412. Guilty on all 34 counts

    On 30 May 2024 the jury convicts on every count—the first conviction of a former U.S. president.[10][17][18]

    On the timeline
  13. 13
    1 Jul 202413. SCOTUS immunity decision

    On 1 July 2024 the Supreme Court decides Trump v. United States; defense later argues official-acts evidence at trial was improper.[19][20]

    On the timeline
  14. 14
    10 Jan 202514. Unconditional discharge

    On 10 January 2025 Merchan imposes no jail, fine or probation; the felony conviction remains.[21][22][23]

    On the timeline
  15. 15
    27–28 Oct 202515. Appeal briefing

    Defense opening brief (Oct 2025), DOJ amicus, DA response (Jul 2026), defense reply (Oct 2026) in App. Div. 1st Dept. No. 2025-00648.[20][24][25][26]

    On the timeline
  16. 16
    28 Aug 202616. Removal denied; argument set

    Hellerstein again denies federal removal on 28 August 2026; oral argument on the state appeal is set for 5 November 2026.[27][28][29][25]

    On the timeline
Sources for the 16 steps
  1. Trial coverage: David Pecker testimony on catch-and-kill (April 2024)
  2. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
  3. AP: Trump hush money trial — a timeline of key events
  4. Wall Street Journal: National Enquirer hid Trump affairs stories (Nov. 4, 2016) — McDougal reporting
  5. Washington Post: Trump recorded in 2005 discussing women (Access Hollywood) — Oct. 7, 2016
  6. Wall Street Journal: Trump lawyer arranged $130,000 payment (Jan. 12, 2018)
  7. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  8. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
  9. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
  10. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  11. NYT: FBI raids office of Trump’s longtime lawyer Michael Cohen (April 2018)
  12. SDNY: Cohen sentencing (Dec. 2018) — related to hush-money and other counts
  13. N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10 — Falsifying business records in the first degree
  14. Trial coverage: Stormy Daniels testimony (May 2024)
  15. Trial coverage: Michael Cohen testimony (May 2024)
  16. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
  17. NYT: Trump guilty on all counts in hush-money case (May 30, 2024)
  18. CNN: Trump becomes first former U.S. president convicted of felony crimes
  19. Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) — presidential immunity
  20. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  21. Justice Merchan sentencing decision (Jan. 3, 2025) — 2025 NY Slip Op 30014
  22. AP: Excerpts from the January 10, 2025 sentencing
  23. N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law — unconditional discharge explained in sentencing coverage
  24. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
  25. New Reform Club: People v. Trump briefs and filings (App. Div. 1st Dept. 2025-00648)
  26. Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div., Nov. 2025)
  27. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93
  28. AP: Trump loses again in bid to erase his hush money conviction (Aug. 28, 2026)
  29. New York Sun: Oral argument set for November 5, 2026

Other readings

Seven major theories, measured against the critical path

Each theory names which numbered steps of the documented chain it contradicts or recasts, what it needs that the record lacks, and what would prove it true or false.

New York County Courthouse
New York County Courthouse Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0
Official

Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory)

False 2017 records hid a scheme to unlawfully promote the 2016 election by silencing scandals.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Manhattan indictment, trial proof and jury instructions.[1][2][3]

Why it lives

In the judgment of conviction and the DA’s appeal brief.

If it were true

The 34 felonies correctly name elevated false-records crimes tied to election unlawfulness.

How it squares with the record

Documents show payment and reimbursement trail. [4] [1]

Jury convicted under instructions that spell out the predicate. [2] [3]

What holds up Official

Holds as the current judgment; vulnerable if elevation/preemption fails on appeal.

Against the critical path
  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
Removes from the critical path

Nothing. It leaves every established link standing.

Adds to the critical path

No new links.

What new information would make it true
  • App. Div. affirmance
  • Any further court adopting the elevation theory
What would prove it false
  • Reversal for legal insufficiency of the predicate
  • Holding that FECA preempts the state theory
Books and films that argue it
People v. Trump indictment (April 2023)Jury instructions (May 23, 2024)AMI non-prosecution agreementCohen SDNY plea (Aug. 2018)Merchan sentencing decision (Jan. 2025)
Related
It was an open-and-shut election-interference crime.Trump is the first former U.S. president convicted of a crime.The 34 records: invoices, ledgers, checksThe election-law conspiracy predicateMay 30, 2024: guilty on all counts
Sources
  1. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
  2. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
  3. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  4. Wall Street Journal: Trump lawyer arranged $130,000 payment (Jan. 12, 2018)
Donald Trump.
Donald Trump. Shealeah Craighead · Public domain
Debated

Bookkeeping case inflated to a felony

At most a records misdemeanor—or no crime—stretched by a novel election theory for politics.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 feloniesrecast
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicaterecast
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 countsrecast
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Controlling holding that FECA preemptsDisputed evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Defense briefs, scholarly amici, political critiques.[1][2][4]

Why it lives

On appeal and in conservative media.

If it were true

Felony elevation should fall; perhaps only misdemeanor exposure or dismissal.

How it squares with the record

Federal prosecutors never charged Trump with FECA. [5]

Instructions allowed conviction without agreeing on unlawful means. [6]

What holds up Debated

Strongest as a legal critique of elevation; weaker as a claim that no false records existed.

Against the critical path
  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 feloniesrecast
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicaterecast
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 countsrecast
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Controlling holding that FECA preemptsDisputed evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 9. 9. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies must recast Indictment’s felony theory is legally invalid even if paperwork exists. What has to be fake or wrong: That elevation via § 17-152 + FECA-like means is available.[1][2]
  • 11. 11. Jury instructions on the predicate must recast Instructions’ means-nonunanimity makes the felony opaque. What has to be fake or wrong: That such instructions are lawful.[6][1]
  • 12. 12. Guilty on all 34 counts must recast Verdict rests on invalid legal theory. What has to be fake or wrong: That felony judgments can stand on this predicate.[1]
Adds to the critical path
  • Controlling holding that FECA preempts Disputed evidence Briefed; not yet held.[7][8]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • That the jury’s felony findings rest on a lawful elevation theory
What new information would make it true
  • Reversal on predicate/preemption
  • Judicial opinions adopting Shugerman-style critique
What would prove it false
  • Affirmance upholding elevation
  • Clear holding that means-nonunanimity is fine
Books and films that argue it
Jury instructions (May 23, 2024)
Related
It was only a misdemeanor bookkeeping dispute.The case was pure election interference by Bragg.How a records misdemeanor becomes a felonySteel-man: federal preemption of the election theorySteel-man: the political-prosecution critique
Sources
  1. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  2. Jed Shugerman amicus supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div. Jan./Sept. 2026)
  3. N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10 — Falsifying business records in the first degree
  4. Tillman & Landmark Legal amicus (App. Div. Oct. 29, 2025)
  5. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  6. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
  7. Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div., Nov. 2025)
  8. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
U.S. Department of Justice building.
U.S. Department of Justice building. APK · CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Debated

Federal plea already covered it

Cohen’s SDNY case and AMI’s NPA closed the matter; state piling-on is abusive.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 feloniesbreaks
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Legal bar on successive state caseThin evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Where it started

Defense fairness arguments after 2018 federal resolutions.[1][2][3]

Why it lives

In political rhetoric and some brief themes.

If it were true

Successive state prosecution should be barred or dismissed as fundamentally unfair.

How it squares with the record

Cohen pleaded to FECA counts about the same payments. [1]

AMI admitted catch-and-kill and avoided trial. [2]

What holds up Debated

Morally resonant for critics; doctrinally weak under dual sovereignty.

Against the critical path
  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 feloniesbreaks
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Legal bar on successive state caseThin evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 9. 9. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies must deny State should not recharge the nucleus after federal closure. What has to be fake or wrong: Dual sovereignty application here.[3]
Adds to the critical path
  • Legal bar on successive state case Thin evidence Doctrine generally allows separate sovereigns.[4]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • That New York may prosecute distinct state records offenses
What new information would make it true
  • Unexpected double-jeopardy-style holding
  • Dismissal on successive-prosecution grounds
What would prove it false
  • Routine dual-sovereignty affirmance
Books and films that argue it
Cohen SDNY plea (Aug. 2018)
Related
Double jeopardy bars the state case after Cohen’s federal plea.Was the state case a second bite after federal closure?Trump was not charged in the SDNY hush-money caseCohen’s FECA guilty plea
Sources
  1. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  2. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
  3. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  4. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
Judge Merchan
Judge Merchan SWinxy · CC BY 4.0
Debated

Biased judge / unfair forum

Merchan’s rulings, gag order and politics made a fair trial impossible.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidencerecast
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 countsrecast
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Proof of disqualifying bias under NY standardsDisputed evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Recusal arguments in motion practice and the appeal brief.[1][2]

Why it lives

Defense appeal point and cable argument.

If it were true

Conviction vacated for structural or due-process error.

How it squares with the record

Gag-order contempt fines happened. [2]

Venue is heavily Democratic Manhattan. [4]

What holds up Debated

Needs an appellate holding; adverse rulings alone rarely suffice.

Against the critical path
  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidencerecast
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 countsrecast
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Proof of disqualifying bias under NY standardsDisputed evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 10. 10. Trial evidence must recast Trial process was structurally unfair. What has to be fake or wrong: That Merchan could preside.[1]
  • 12. 12. Guilty on all 34 counts must recast Verdict products of biased forum. What has to be fake or wrong: Reliability of the guilty findings.[1]
Adds to the critical path
  • Proof of disqualifying bias under NY standards Disputed evidence Briefed, not established on appeal.[1][3]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • That the trial judge was qualified to sit
What new information would make it true
  • Recusal-based reversal
  • Finding of structural bias
What would prove it false
  • Explicit rejection of recusal claim on appeal
Related
Merchan’s bias voids the trial.The case was pure election interference by Bragg.Merchan’s gag orderDoes Manhattan venue make the verdict illegitimate?October 2025: the appeal brief lands
Sources
  1. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  2. Coverage of Justice Merchan gag order during 2024 trial
  3. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
  4. ABC: Trump formally appeals his New York hush money conviction (Oct 28, 2025)
Donald Trump at the White House.
Donald Trump at the White House. The White House · Public domain
Debated

Immunity / official-acts taint

After Trump v. United States, some trial evidence was impermissible; conviction cannot stand.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidencerecast
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decisionrecast
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Appellate finding of prejudicial official-acts evidenceDisputed evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Post-July 2024 immunity decision applied retroactively in briefs and removal.[1][2][3]

Why it lives

Removal litigation and appeal point.

If it were true

Vacatur or suppression-based new trial.

How it squares with the record

SCOTUS set a new official-acts framework after the verdict. [1]

Defense identifies aide testimony and posts as official. [2]

What holds up Debated

Hellerstein rejected removal again; App. Div. has not ruled.

Against the critical path
  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidencerecast
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decisionrecast
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Appellate finding of prejudicial official-acts evidenceDisputed evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 10. 10. Trial evidence must recast Some admitted evidence was official-acts. What has to be fake or wrong: That the evidentiary set was wholly private.[2]
  • 13. 13. SCOTUS immunity decision must recast Immunity decision requires undoing the verdict. What has to be fake or wrong: That post-verdict immunity law is irrelevant.[1]
Adds to the critical path
  • Appellate finding of prejudicial official-acts evidence Disputed evidence DA calls any such evidence incidental.[4]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • Hellerstein’s private-conduct characterization as to the scheme
What new information would make it true
  • Holding that insulated evidence requires reversal
  • Federal jurisdiction + dismissal
What would prove it false
  • Holding that all material evidence was private
Books and films that argue it
Trump v. United States (2024)Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026)
Related
Presidential immunity wipes the case.Did any official-acts evidence taint the trial?August 28, 2026: Hellerstein says no againOctober 2025: the appeal brief lands
Sources
  1. Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) — presidential immunity
  2. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  3. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93
  4. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
Michael Cohen
Michael Cohen JakeLately · CC0
Alleged

Cohen fabricated Trump’s directive

Cohen lied about Trump ordering the payment/reimbursements to feed his grudge and brand.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal feesrecast
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidencerecast
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Exculpatory contemporaneous record of Trump’s non-involvementNo evidence
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

Defense cross and public attacks on Cohen.[1][4]

Why it lives

Core credibility war.

If it were true

Reasonable doubt on intent; acquittal should have occurred—or appeal should treat proof as insufficient.

How it squares with the record

Cohen has admitted lying under oath in other settings. [2]

He monetized anti-Trump media after prison. [1]

What holds up Alleged

Impeachment landed; jury still believed enough, with documents.

Against the critical path
  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal feesrecast
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidencerecast
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
  17. +Exculpatory contemporaneous record of Trump’s non-involvementNo evidence
Removes from the critical path
  • 5. 5. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees must recast Reimbursement paperwork without Trump’s criminal intent. What has to be fake or wrong: That Trump shared the charged intent.[1]
  • 10. 10. Trial evidence must recast Star witness is incredible as to the directive. What has to be fake or wrong: Jury’s credibility finding.[3]
Adds to the critical path
  • Exculpatory contemporaneous record of Trump’s non-involvement No evidence Not produced at trial.[1]
What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • Cohen’s account of Trump’s directions
What new information would make it true
  • Hard proof Trump lacked knowledge of reimbursement labeling
  • Recantation plus documentary collapse
What would prove it false
  • Additional corroboration of directive (e.g., contemporaneous notes)
Related
You can’t convict anyone on Michael Cohen’s word.Michael Cohen on the standHow much did documents corroborate Cohen?Who signed the checks
Sources
  1. Trial coverage: Michael Cohen testimony (May 2024)
  2. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  3. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  4. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
Alvin Bragg
Alvin Bragg CmdrDan · CC BY-SA 4.0
Debated

Conviction will stand

App. Div. will affirm: evidence overwhelming, legal theory acceptable, private conduct.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefingrecast
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument setrecast
Open the file
Who believes it
Who has voiced it
Where it started

DA respondent brief and prosecution-aligned forecasts.[1][2]

Why it lives

Prosecution camp prediction.

If it were true

Felony conviction remains after appeal (subject to higher review).

How it squares with the record

Jury convicted on all counts. [2]

Hellerstein again called the scheme private. [3]

What holds up Debated

A prediction, not a fact—argument is 5 Nov 2026.

Against the critical path
  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefingrecast
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument setrecast
Removes from the critical path
  • 15. 15. Appeal briefing must recast Appeal issues lack merit. What has to be fake or wrong: That preemption/immunity/recusal require reversal.[1]
  • 16. 16. Removal denied; argument set must recast Removal loss foreshadows affirmance. What has to be fake or wrong: That federal denials predict state outcome (they need not).[3]
Adds to the critical path

No new links.

What would have to turn out fake or wrong
  • That the App. Div. is poised to wipe the case before argument
What new information would make it true
  • Affirmance
What would prove it false
  • Reversal or vacatur
Books and films that argue it
Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026)
Related
It was an open-and-shut election-interference crime.The hush-money conviction has been overturned.July 2026: prosecutors defend the verdictOral argument set for November 5, 2026August 28, 2026: Hellerstein says no again
Sources
  1. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
  2. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  3. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93

Genuinely unknown

Open questions

What is genuinely unknown, known but often misread, or only partly known.

Partly knownWhich unlawful means did jurors rely on?
What is known
  • Instructions allowed FECA, tax, or other false records. [1]
What is not

Which means any juror actually used.

Why it is still open

No special verdict.

Does it change the story?

Shapes how appellate courts describe the felony.

What would settle it

Juror testimony (generally inadmissible) or a future opinion reconstructing the record.

Bookkeeping case inflated to a felony Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory) The verdict was non-unanimous.
Sources
  1. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
Genuinely unknownWill the App. Div. affirm, reverse, or remand?
What is known
  • Briefs are in; argument set for 5 Nov 2026. [1]
What is not

The court’s merits decision.

Why it is still open

Not yet argued/decided.

Does it change the story?

Determines whether the felony judgment survives.

What would settle it

The Appellate Division’s opinion (and any further appeal).

Conviction will stand Bookkeeping case inflated to a felony The hush-money conviction has been overturned.
Sources
  1. New York Sun: Oral argument set for November 5, 2026
  2. New Reform Club: People v. Trump briefs and filings (App. Div. 1st Dept. 2025-00648)
Genuinely unknownDid the 2006 encounter happen?
What is known
  • Daniels testified yes; Trump denies. [1]
What is not

A definitive private-fact finding beyond the payment trail.

Why it is still open

Conviction did not require a special ‘affair’ verdict.

Does it change the story?

Public memory more than the elements.

What would settle it

Unlikely in this criminal case’s posture.

Cohen fabricated Trump’s directive He was convicted for having an affair.
Sources
  1. Trial coverage: Stormy Daniels testimony (May 2024)
Partly knownIs there a contemporaneous Trump directive on paper?
What is known
  • Cohen so testified; checks bear signatures; Weisselberg structuring described. [1] [2]
What is not

A Trump-authored memo ordering ‘call it legal fees.’

Why it is still open

Much intent proof was testimonial.

Does it change the story?

Corroboration wars.

What would settle it

Newly found contemporaneous documents.

Cohen fabricated Trump’s directive Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory) You can’t convict anyone on Michael Cohen’s word.
Sources
  1. Trial coverage: Michael Cohen testimony (May 2024)
  2. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
Genuinely unknownDoes FECA preempt New York’s elevation theory?
What is known
  • Issue is fully briefed with federal amicus support for appellant. [1] [2]
What is not

Controlling judicial answer in this case.

Why it is still open

Awaiting App. Div. (and perhaps higher) decision.

Does it change the story?

Could wipe felonies even if records look false.

What would settle it

A holding on preemption.

Bookkeeping case inflated to a felony Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory) Federal law clearly preempts this conviction.
Sources
  1. Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div., Nov. 2025)
  2. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  3. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
Partly knownHow much trial evidence was ‘official acts’?
What is known
  • Defense lists categories; DA calls them incidental; Hellerstein rejected removal. [1] [2]
What is not

App. Div.’s evidence-by-evidence view.

Why it is still open

Immunity law post-dated the verdict.

Does it change the story?

Possible vacatur standard.

What would settle it

Detailed appellate parsing.

Immunity / official-acts taint Presidential immunity wipes the case.
Sources
  1. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  2. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93
  3. Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) — presidential immunity
Genuinely unknownWill the November 5 argument date hold?
What is known
  • Sun report and docket annotators list 5 Nov 2026, 2 p.m. [1] [2]
What is not

Last-minute calendar changes.

Why it is still open

Courts sometimes adjourn.

Does it change the story?

Practical timing for the public.

What would settle it

Same-day court calendar.

Conviction will stand The hush-money conviction has been overturned.
Sources
  1. New York Sun: Oral argument set for November 5, 2026
  2. New Reform Club: People v. Trump briefs and filings (App. Div. 1st Dept. 2025-00648)

What people say

15 things people say about the hush-money case, checked

Claims from both camps: crime nobody can name, open-and-shut cover-up, conviction overturned, no punishment, political prosecution. Each is set against the indictment, instructions, verdict and appeal record.

What the ratings mean
  • History Settled public record.
  • Official Charged, pleaded, convicted, or stated in primary court/government documents.
  • Mixed Partly established; important limits remain.
  • Alleged Claimed in charging papers or testimony; contested.
  • Debated Serious disagreement among informed sources.
  • Discredited Contradicted by the primary record cited here.

DiscreditedTrump was convicted of a crime nobody can name.What the crime was

What the record shows. False. The crime is falsifying business records, 34 counts, elevated via an election-conspiracy theory spelled out in the jury instructions.

Who says it: Trump allies and social posts

Points for
  • The elevating ‘other crime’ was not a freestanding charged count with its own verdict form.
Points against
  • The judgment names Penal Law § 175.10.
  • Instructions explain the predicate in writing.
Sources
  1. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  2. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
  3. N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10 — Falsifying business records in the first degree
Read the full entry
HistoryTrump got no punishment for the felony conviction.Sentence & status

What the record shows. Documented as to jail/fine/probation: unconditional discharge. The conviction itself remains a legal consequence.

Who says it: Sentencing coverage

Points for
  • Merchan imposed no jail, fine or probation.
Points against
  • A felony conviction on the record is still a formal judgment pending appeal.
Sources
  1. AP: Excerpts from the January 10, 2025 sentencing
  2. Justice Merchan sentencing decision (Jan. 3, 2025) — 2025 NY Slip Op 30014
Read the full entry
DiscreditedThe hush-money conviction has been overturned.Appeal & removal

What the record shows. False as of this edition. Appeal pending; oral argument set for 5 Nov 2026; removal denials are not merits reversals.

Who says it: Social posts

Points for
  • Serious appellate arguments exist.
Points against
  • No App. Div. merits reversal has issued.
  • Hellerstein’s August 2026 order denied removal again.
Sources
  1. New York Sun: Oral argument set for November 5, 2026
  2. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93
  3. AP: Trump loses again in bid to erase his hush money conviction (Aug. 28, 2026)
Read the full entry
MixedIt was an open-and-shut election-interference crime.What the crime was

What the record shows. Partly. The jury convicted on false records with an election predicate; whether that elevation theory is lawful remains the appeal’s core.

Who says it: Prosecution-aligned commentary

Points for
  • Jury convicted on all 34 counts.
  • Documents show payment and reimbursement trail.
Points against
  • Federal prosecutors never charged Trump on FECA.
  • Amici and DOJ brief attack the state theory.
Sources
  1. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  2. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  3. Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div., Nov. 2025)
  4. Jed Shugerman amicus supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div. Jan./Sept. 2026)
Read the full entry
MixedIt was only a misdemeanor bookkeeping dispute.What the crime was

What the record shows. Incomplete. Without elevation it can be a misdemeanor; the state charged and obtained felony convictions using the election-conspiracy theory.

Who says it: Defense-aligned commentary

Points for
  • Base records offense can be a misdemeanor.
  • Elevation theory is legally contested.
Points against
  • The judgment of conviction is felony counts.
  • Jury found the elevating intent under the instructions.
Sources
  1. N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10 — Falsifying business records in the first degree
  2. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
  3. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
Read the full entry
MixedYou can’t convict anyone on Michael Cohen’s word.Underlying facts

What the record shows. Overstated. Cohen is a convicted liar; the jury also saw documents, Pecker, and AMI admissions. Still, intent hinged heavily on Cohen.

Who says it: Defense and critics

Points for
  • Cohen’s perjury history is real.
  • Cross was brutal.
Points against
  • Checks, invoices and AMI NPA are non-Cohen proof of key acts.
  • Jury convicted after hearing impeachment.
Sources
  1. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  2. Trial coverage: Michael Cohen testimony (May 2024)
  3. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
  4. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
Read the full entry
DebatedThe case was pure election interference by Bragg.Politics of the case

What the record shows. Debated. Political incentives existed; selective-prosecution doctrine is strict; a jury still found the elements under the given instructions.

Who says it: Trump campaign and allies

Points for
  • Timing in a presidential cycle.
  • Unusual elevation theory.
  • Manhattan venue.
Points against
  • Documentary exhibits were extensive.
  • Courts have not dismissed for selective prosecution.
Sources
  1. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  2. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
  3. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
Read the full entry
DiscreditedHe was convicted for having an affair.What the crime was

What the record shows. False. No sex-crime count; records counts about concealment of a payment.

Who says it: Casual social phrasing

Points for
  • Daniels testimony was graphic and memorable.
Points against
  • Indictment and verdict forms are falsifying business records.
Sources
  1. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
  2. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
Read the full entry
DebatedFederal law clearly preempts this conviction.Appeal & removal

What the record shows. Live appellate issue—not yet a holding. Strong briefs argue yes; DA argues state records interests remain.

Who says it: Defense amici and DOJ amicus

Points for
  • FECA occupies much campaign-finance regulation.
  • Scholarly amici support appellant.
Points against
  • No controlling reversal yet.
  • State may punish false local business records.
Sources
  1. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  2. Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae supporting defendant-appellant (App. Div., Nov. 2025)
  3. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
Read the full entry
MixedPresidential immunity wipes the case.Appeal & removal

What the record shows. Not so far. Hellerstein called the hush payment private; appeal still argues some evidence was official-acts.

Who says it: Defense removal filings

Points for
  • Trump v. United States is real law.
  • Some aide/Twitter evidence is contested.
Points against
  • Aug 2026 denial again.
  • Core scheme charged as private.
Sources
  1. Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) — presidential immunity
  2. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93
  3. AP: Trump loses again in bid to erase his hush money conviction (Aug. 28, 2026)
Read the full entry
HistoryTrump is the first former U.S. president convicted of a crime.What the crime was

What the record shows. True as of the May 2024 verdict; remains accurate while the conviction stands.

Who says it: Mainstream coverage

Points for
  • No prior former president has a criminal conviction on the books.
Points against
  • Appeal could change status later.
Sources
  1. CNN: Trump becomes first former U.S. president convicted of felony crimes
  2. NYT: Trump guilty on all counts in hush-money case (May 30, 2024)
Read the full entry
MixedCatch-and-kill itself is a crime.Underlying facts

What the record shows. Not automatically. AMI’s NPA treats election-timed burial as FECA-relevant; ordinary buried celebrity stories are not per se criminal.

Who says it: Media commentary

Points for
  • AMI admitted election purpose on McDougal.
Points against
  • Buying story rights is often civil/contractual.
Sources
  1. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
  2. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
Read the full entry
DiscreditedThe verdict was non-unanimous.What the crime was

What the record shows. False as to guilt. Instructions required unanimity on guilt and the election conspiracy; not on which unlawful means.

Who says it: Viral posts

Points for
  • Means need not be unanimous.
Points against
  • Guilt unanimity was required and returned.
Sources
  1. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
Read the full entry
MixedDouble jeopardy bars the state case after Cohen’s federal plea.Politics of the case

What the record shows. Weak as doctrine: separate sovereigns and separate statutes. Stronger as a fairness argument.

Who says it: Defense-aligned commentary

Points for
  • Same factual nucleus as Cohen’s FECA plea.
Points against
  • Trump was not the federal defendant.
  • Dual sovereignty permits successive prosecutions.
Sources
  1. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  2. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  3. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
Read the full entry
DebatedMerchan’s bias voids the trial.Appeal & removal

What the record shows. Debated. Recusal is briefed; no appellate holding yet that bias requires reversal.

Who says it: Defense brief

Points for
  • Family political donations controversies.
  • Gag-order clashes.
Points against
  • Adverse rulings ≠ automatic disqualification.
  • Issue is pending, not won.
Sources
  1. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  2. ABC: Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction (Jul 2026)
  3. Coverage of Justice Merchan gag order during 2024 trial
Read the full entry

Media

Books, films and official follow-ups

Argument-making works get a panel showing which critical-path steps they support or challenge.

Official follow-ups 7

2023charging documentcharging document · 2023People v. Trump indictment (April 2023)Manhattan DAPrimary accusation later tested at trial.
How it changes the story

Defines the 34 counts.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal feesrecast
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 feloniesrecast
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
Supports
9. 9. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies, 5. 5. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
Challenges
none
Whose account it centres
Prosecution theory
For its thesis to hold
Trial proof

Matching theories: Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory)

Open
2024court documentcourt document · 2024Jury instructions (May 23, 2024)NY Courts / MerchanControls what the jury had to find.
How it changes the story

Sets elevation and unanimity rules.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicaterecast
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 countsrecast
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
Supports
11. 11. Jury instructions on the predicate, 12. 12. Guilty on all 34 counts
Challenges
none
Whose account it centres
Legal elements
For its thesis to hold
That instructions are lawful

Matching theories: Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory) Bookkeeping case inflated to a felony

Open
2018agreementagreement · 2018AMI non-prosecution agreementSDNYCorporate admissions on McDougal catch-and-kill.
How it changes the story

Locks AMI’s narrative.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meetingrecast
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-killrecast
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreementrecast
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
Supports
1. 1. Eyes-and-ears meeting, 2. 2. McDougal catch-and-kill, 8. 8. AMI non-prosecution agreement
Challenges
none
Whose account it centres
Publisher admissions
For its thesis to hold
Truthfulness of corporate statement

Matching theories: Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory)

Open
2018pleaplea · 2018Cohen SDNY plea (Aug. 2018)SDNYFederal FECA admissions by Cohen.
How it changes the story

Federal baseline.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000recast
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)recast
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 feloniesbreaks
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
Supports
4. 4. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000, 7. 7. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
Challenges
9. 9. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
Whose account it centres
Cohen
For its thesis to hold
That plea allocution is accurate

Matching theories: Federal plea already covered it Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory)

Open
2024opinionopinion · 2024Trump v. United States (2024)U.S. Supreme CourtImmunity framework used in later hush-money litigation.
How it changes the story

Raises official-acts issues post-verdict.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidencebreaks
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 countsbreaks
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decisionrecast
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
Supports
13. 13. SCOTUS immunity decision
Challenges
10. 10. Trial evidence, 12. 12. Guilty on all 34 counts
Whose account it centres
Constitutional criminal procedure
For its thesis to hold
That some hush-trial evidence was official

Matching theories: Immunity / official-acts taint

Open
2025opinionopinion · 2025Merchan sentencing decision (Jan. 2025)NY CourtsExplains unconditional discharge.
How it changes the story

Separates conviction from punishment.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decision
  14. 1414. Unconditional dischargerecast
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument set
Supports
14. 14. Unconditional discharge
Challenges
none
Whose account it centres
Sentencing court
For its thesis to hold
Record cited in decision

Matching theories: Election cover-up felony (prosecution theory)

Open
2026opinionopinion · 2026Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026)SDNYAgain denies federal removal.
How it changes the story

Keeps case in state system.

  1. 11. Eyes-and-ears meeting
  2. 22. McDougal catch-and-kill
  3. 33. Access Hollywood tape
  4. 44. Cohen pays Daniels $130,000
  5. 55. 2017 reimbursements booked as legal fees
  6. 66. Cohen raid and federal case
  7. 77. Cohen guilty plea (FECA counts)
  8. 88. AMI non-prosecution agreement
  9. 99. Bragg indictment — 34 felonies
  10. 1010. Trial evidence
  11. 1111. Jury instructions on the predicate
  12. 1212. Guilty on all 34 counts
  13. 1313. SCOTUS immunity decisionbreaks
  14. 1414. Unconditional discharge
  15. 1515. Appeal briefing
  16. 1616. Removal denied; argument setrecast
Supports
16. 16. Removal denied; argument set
Challenges
13. 13. SCOTUS immunity decision
Whose account it centres
Federal judge on private conduct
For its thesis to hold
That hush scheme is unofficial

Matching theories: Immunity / official-acts taint Conviction will stand

Open

Public memory

How memory of it changed

Public-memory phases with sourced polls only when available.

  1. Michael Cohen
    JakeLately · CC0
    2018 Converging

    Cohen plea as the whole story

    Dominant views
    • Much of mainstream press Cohen’s FECA plea closed the federal chapter; Trump uncharged.[1]
    What drove it
    Catch-and-kill itself is a crime.
  2. Alvin Bragg
    CmdrDan · CC BY-SA 4.0
    2023 Split into camps

    First indictment shock

    Dominant views
    • Democrats Accountability at last.[3]
    • Republicans Banana-republic politics.[4]
    What drove it
    • Historic first indictment of a former president.[3]
    The case was pure election interference by Bragg.
  3. New York County Courthouse
    Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0
    May 2024 Split into camps

    Guilty on 34

    Dominant views
    • Prosecution camp Democracy defended.[5]
    • Defense camp Rigged court.[6]
    What drove it
    • Live televised-era trial coverage.[7]
    Trump is the first former U.S. president convicted of a crime. Trump was convicted of a crime nobody can name.
  4. Donald Trump.
    Shealeah Craighead · Public domain
    Jan 2025 Split into camps

    Conviction without punishment

    Dominant views
    • Critics of Trump Still a felon.[8]
    • Trump allies Even the judge knew it was nothing.[8]
    What drove it
    • Unconditional discharge optics.[9]
    Trump got no punishment for the felony conviction.
  5. New York County Courthouse
    Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0
    2026 Split into camps

    Appeal season and erasure myths

    Dominant views
    • Social feeds Often claim it is already gone.[10]
    • Court record Briefed and calendared, not reversed.[11]
    What drove it
    • Removal headlines confused with merits.[12]
    The hush-money conviction has been overturned.
Sources and polls
  1. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  2. SDNY: American Media Inc. non-prosecution agreement (Sept. 2018) — catch-and-kill admissions
  3. People v. Trump indictment — 34 counts falsifying business records (April 2023)
  4. ABC News timeline: Manhattan DA’s Stormy Daniels hush money case
  5. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  6. ABC: Trump formally appeals his New York hush money conviction (Oct 28, 2025)
  7. NYT: Trump guilty on all counts in hush-money case (May 30, 2024)
  8. AP: Excerpts from the January 10, 2025 sentencing
  9. Justice Merchan sentencing decision (Jan. 3, 2025) — 2025 NY Slip Op 30014
  10. New York Sun: Oral argument set for November 5, 2026
  11. New Reform Club: People v. Trump briefs and filings (App. Div. 1st Dept. 2025-00648)
  12. AP: Trump loses again in bid to erase his hush money conviction (Aug. 28, 2026)

Lasting impact

How it changed us

Laws, norms and habits the fight remade.

Laws & institutions 2

How charging theories and immunity law interacted with a state records case.

New York County Courthouse
Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0
2024–26One-case law

Felony elevation via election conspiracy

A template—or a cautionary tale—for using § 175.10 with election-law predicates.

The evidence it changed
  • Instructions and appeal briefing fight over the model.[1][2]
It was only a misdemeanor bookkeeping dispute.
Donald Trump at the White House.
The White House · Public domain
2024–26In force

Immunity law’s shadow on closed trials

Post-verdict constitutional criminal procedure arguments applied to evidence already heard.

The evidence it changed
  • Trump v. United States cited throughout appeal/removal.[3][4]

People it remade 2

Careers and public roles reshaped by the payments and the trial.

Michael Cohen
JakeLately · CC0
2018–26Mixed

Michael Cohen as perpetual witness-brand

From fixer to federal convict to cable protagonist.

The evidence it changed
  • Plea, sentence, trial testimony, media career.[5][6]
Stormy Daniels
Toglenn · CC BY-SA 3.0
2018–26History

Stormy Daniels in the political lexicon

A stage name became shorthand for an entire prosecution.

The evidence it changed
  • Payment reporting through trial testimony.[7][8]

Things we now take for granted 3

Habits of speech and politics the case normalized.

Donald Trump.
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain
2024

‘Former presidents can be convicted’

Before

Assumption that ex-presidents are practically untouchable criminally.

After

A completed state felony trial and conviction (pending appeal).

The evidence it changed
  • May 30, 2024 verdict coverage.[9][10]
National Enquirer / AMI context
Blastoids · CC BY-SA 3.0
2018–26

Everyone says ‘hush-money case’

Before

Payment story as scandal journalism.

After

Default label even when the judgment is false records.

The evidence it changed
Judge Merchan
SWinxy · CC BY 4.0
2025

Conviction and punishment split in public talk

Before

Popular assumption that felony implies jail.

After

Widespread grasp that discharge can leave a felony with no jail/fine/probation.

The evidence it changed
  • Unconditional discharge reporting.[13][14]
Sources for this section
  1. People v. Trump — Jury Instructions and Charges (May 23, 2024)
  2. AP: Trump’s lawyers appeal his hush money criminal conviction (Oct 2025)
  3. Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) — presidential immunity
  4. Judge Hellerstein removal decision (Aug. 28, 2026) — SDNY docket doc 93
  5. SDNY: Michael Cohen guilty plea (Aug. 21, 2018) — campaign finance and related counts
  6. Trial coverage: Michael Cohen testimony (May 2024)
  7. Wall Street Journal: Trump lawyer arranged $130,000 payment (Jan. 12, 2018)
  8. Trial coverage: Stormy Daniels testimony (May 2024)
  9. CNN: Trump becomes first former U.S. president convicted of felony crimes
  10. NYT: Trump guilty on all counts in hush-money case (May 30, 2024)
  11. Manhattan DA: 34-count jury conviction of Donald J. Trump (May 30, 2024)
  12. N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10 — Falsifying business records in the first degree
  13. AP: Excerpts from the January 10, 2025 sentencing
  14. Justice Merchan sentencing decision (Jan. 3, 2025) — 2025 NY Slip Op 30014

How this guide works

Sources and method

This guide starts from the Manhattan indictment and jury instructions, the May 2024 verdict, Justice Merchan’s sentencing decision, Cohen’s SDNY plea and AMI’s non-prosecution agreement, SCOTUS’s 2024 immunity decision, App. Div. briefing through October 2026, and Hellerstein’s August 2026 removal denial.

Grokipedia is used only as a checklist of topics to cover. It is never cited.

Political even-handedness: the same evidentiary standard applies to claims that this was a routine bookkeeping case, that it was an open-and-shut election crime, and that the conviction has already been erased. Charged, pleaded, convicted, discharged and merely alleged are kept distinct.

This page does not cover the Russia–Ukraine war or other foreign conflicts. It is limited to the 2016 hush payments, related AMI/Cohen conduct, the Manhattan prosecution and the appeal/removal aftermath.

An earlier Trump hub treated hush money as one short case file. This is the full guide that replaces that format for this topic. It nests under The Trump Files collection.

By the numbers
  • 52 entries in 6 eras
  • 39 distinct sources cited
  • 31 dated events
  • 15 claims checked
  • 7 theories opened up
  • 8 books, films and follow-ups
  • 16 steps on the critical path
  • 7 open questions
  • 7 lasting changes
  • 41 freely licensed pictures

Pictures & licenses

Picture credits

Every picture is public domain or freely licensed, from Wikimedia Commons. Files are stored on this site with their metadata removed; each credit links to the original.

Donald Trump.
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain · original
Donald Trump at the White House.
The White House · Public domain · original
Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign period (file photo used in related AI Files guides).
Gage Skidmore · CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) · original
Trump Tower, New York City.
Kidfly182 · CC BY 4.0 · original
2016 U.S. presidential election context.
Gage · CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) · original
U.S. Department of Justice building.
APK · CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) · original
Donald Trump Jr.
Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America · CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0) · original
Donald Trump.
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain · original
Michael Cohen
JakeLately · CC0 · original
Karen McDougal
Sam Posten III from Navesink, NJ, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · original
National Enquirer / AMI context
Blastoids · CC BY-SA 3.0 · original
Alvin Bragg
CmdrDan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · original
New York County Courthouse
Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net). · CC BY-SA 4.0 · original
Counsel stand-in
Los Angeles Daily News · CC BY 4.0 · original
Cyrus Vance Jr.
cyvanceforda · CC BY-SA 2.0 · original
Hope Hicks
The White House · Public domain · original
Todd Blanche
BruceSchaff · CC BY-SA 4.0 · original
Emil Bove
United States Senate · Public domain · original
Prosecutor stand-in
José Guadalupe Posada · CC0 · original
Prosecutor stand-in
Daniel Case · CC BY-SA 3.0 · original
Official stand-in
Carol M. Highsmith · Public domain · original
Finance staff stand-in
Members of the staff of the Mississippi State Auditor's Office and the State Accounting Department endorsing Carl C. White · Public domain · original
Accounts staff stand-in
USPS · Public domain · original
Banking stand-in
Jakub Hałun · CC BY 4.0 · original
Editor stand-in
Book edited and compiled by Alfred D. Bowen. The photos are uncredited. · Public domain · original
Melania Trump
Régine Mahaux · CC BY 3.0 us · original
Letitia James
Thomas Good · CC BY-SA 4.0 · original
Lawyer stand-in
American Academy of Appellate Lawyers · Public domain · original
Scholar stand-in
Giuseppe Arcimboldo · Public domain · original
Scholar stand-in
Giuseppe Arcimboldo · Public domain · original
Pam Bondi
IddjejejQ9282 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · original
Alina Habba
U.S. Department of Justice · Public domain · original
Joe Tacopina
Rapallo80 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · original
Stormy Daniels
Toglenn · CC BY-SA 3.0 · original
David Pecker (stand-in)
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain · original
Judge Merchan
SWinxy · CC BY 4.0 · original
Alvin K. Hellerstein (stand-in)
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain · original
Allen Weisselberg (stand-in)
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain · original
Robert Costello (stand-in)
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain · original
Mark Pomerantz (stand-in)
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain · original
Carey Dunne (stand-in)
Shealeah Craighead · Public domain · original