COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

Palantir and ICE

Case-management software since 2014, and ImmigrationOS in 2025

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Thiel hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

ImmigrationOS

What the 2025 contract says.

WIRED reported, from ICE’s published contract justification, that ICE was paying Palantir about $30 million for “near real-time visibility” on people self-deporting, under a new platform called the Immigration Lifecycle Operating System, or ImmigrationOS. A prototype was due by 25 September 2025 and the contract runs at least through September 2027. [1]

Business Insider gave the exact figure, $29.8 million, and noted that it was an add-on to an existing contract, and that DHS first contracted Palantir to build ICE’s case-management system in 2014. [2]

What we can’t tell you. How ImmigrationOS is used day to day is not public.

The sources

  1. WIRED: ICE is paying Palantir $30 million to build ImmigrationOS, 18 April 2025 ↗

    From ICE’s own contract document: near real-time visibility on self-deportation, a prototype by 25 September 2025, an add-on to a 2022 contract.

  2. Business Insider: Palantir and ICE agree $30 million contract, April 2025 ↗

    Gives the exact award, $29.8 million, and that DHS first contracted Palantir for case management in 2014.

Who is responsible?

Rights groups, Palantir and Karp.

Amnesty International said in 2020 that Palantir was failing to do human-rights due diligence on its ICE work and cited reports that ICE used Palantir technology to arrest parents and caregivers of migrant children in 2017 and to plan the 2019 Mississippi raids. [1]

Palantir replied at the time that its contracts were with Homeland Security Investigations, ICE’s criminal arm, and did not facilitate civil removals by Enforcement and Removal Operations. The 2025 ImmigrationOS work goes beyond that earlier line. [2]

In February 2026 Karp argued that Palantir’s software is “equally capable of preventing an unconstitutional intrusion into the private lives of citizens by the state,” pointing to permission controls and audit logs that the customer manages. [3][4]

What we can’t tell you. Audit logs are held by the government, not published.

The sources

  1. Amnesty International USA: Palantir’s ICE contracts raise human-rights concerns, 28 September 2020 ↗

    Advocacy group’s findings.

  2. Palantir: response to Amnesty International, 2020 (PDF) ↗

    The company’s answer, including that it does not work on certain ICE removal functions.

  3. CNBC: Karp says anti-ICE protesters should want more Palantir, 2 February 2026 ↗

    The chief executive’s defense: permissions and audit logs limit misuse.

  4. Palantir documentation: privacy and civil liberties in practice ↗

    Company documentation of access controls and audit features, and what the customer controls.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 153 rated claims ↗

← The Thiel hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesThiel shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesThiel.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.