COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The planes operation

How Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s idea became the 9/11 plot, and what it cost

← Interactive guide and chronology · The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

The planner the Commission called the “principal architect.”

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, known as KSM, grew up in Kuwait in a Pakistani Baluch family and studied engineering in North Carolina. He helped fund his nephew Ramzi Yousef’s 1993 truck bomb under the World Trade Center, and in 1994–95 worked with Yousef in Manila on the Bojinka plot to blow up airliners over the Pacific. [1][2]

In mid-1996 he met bin Laden at Tora Bora and proposed several schemes. One was to train pilots to fly planes into buildings in the United States. At first he envisioned ten planes and targets on both coasts, with himself landing the last to make a speech. Bin Laden thought that too much. He gave the go-ahead to a smaller version in late 1998 or early 1999. [1]

The Commission called KSM “the principal architect of the 9/11 attacks.” Its staff noted that much of what it knew about the plot’s planning came from KSM and other detainees, through intelligence reports it was not allowed to check by questioning them. [1][3]

What we can’t tell you. The Commission never questioned KSM; its account of his role comes from CIA reports of his interrogations.

The sources

  1. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 5: Al Qaeda Aims at the American Homeland ↗

    KSM’s planes operation, the selection of the hijackers, financing, and the finding of no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior officials individually funded al Qaeda.

  2. FBI history: World Trade Center bombing 1993 ↗

    The first attack on the towers, by Ramzi Yousef, KSM’s nephew.

  3. 9/11 Commission staff statement 16: Outline of the 9/11 Plot ↗

    Staff account of the plot from bin Laden’s approval to the attack, based largely on detainee reporting.

What it cost and how the money moved

Ordinary bank wires, not a state treasury.

Commission staff estimated the plot cost al Qaeda $400,000 to $500,000, of which about $300,000 passed through the hijackers’ US bank accounts. The money arrived by wire transfer from the United Arab Emirates, in cash and traveler’s checks carried in, and through foreign accounts reached from ATMs and credit cards in the United States. [1]

Most came through KSM and two facilitators in the UAE, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali (his nephew) and Mustafa al-Hawsawi. Days before the attack the hijackers sent about $26,000 they had not spent back to the UAE. [1][2]

The staff found “no credible evidence that any person in the United States gave the hijackers substantial financial assistance,” and “no evidence that any foreign government — or foreign government official — supplied any funding.” That finding is the starting point for the arguments in the 28 pages and the Bayoumi file, which are about help with housing and logistics, not about the plot’s budget. [2][3]

What we can’t tell you. Al Qaeda’s overall funding before 2001 was harder to trace; the staff said the source of the plot’s money was ultimately al Qaeda’s general funds.

The sources

  1. 9/11 Commission staff monograph: Terrorist Financing ↗

    The cost of the plot ($400,000–500,000), how money moved, and why the staff found no evidence of foreign-government funding.

  2. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 5: Al Qaeda Aims at the American Homeland ↗

    KSM’s planes operation, the selection of the hijackers, financing, and the finding of no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior officials individually funded al Qaeda.

  3. FBI testimony, 2002: PENTTBOM ↗

    FBI testimony to Congress on the progress of the investigation, the hijackers’ money and their communications.

Choosing the targets

Why the Capitol may have been the fourth target.

The targets discussed before Atta left Afghanistan in early 2000 were the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the White House and the Capitol. According to Binalshibh, bin Laden preferred the White House and passed that message to Atta more than once; the final choice was left open into the summer of 2001. [1][2]

The Commission concluded that United 93’s target was “either the Capitol or the White House.” It turned toward Washington before the passengers fought back. [3] What happened on board is in the Flight 93 file.

What we can’t tell you. The plotters’ accounts come from CIA interrogation reports.

The sources

  1. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 7: The Attack Looms ↗

    The hijackers in San Diego and Florida, Bayoumi and Thumairy, Atta’s alleged Prague trip, transit through Iran, flight schools and the final preparations.

  2. 9/11 Commission staff statement 16: Outline of the 9/11 Plot ↗

    Staff account of the plot from bin Laden’s approval to the attack, based largely on detainee reporting.

  3. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 1: “We Have Some Planes” ↗

    The minute-by-minute account of the four flights and of the FAA and NORAD response, including the 10:03:11 crash time of United 93 and when the shootdown order reached the pilots.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

5 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 162 rated claims ↗

← The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFiles911 shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFiles911.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.