COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The passports that survived

Suqami’s passport in Manhattan, Jarrah’s visa in Pennsylvania, and the planted-evidence claim

← Interactive guide and chronology · The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

Suqami’s passport

Found on the street before the second collapse.

According to the Commission’s travel monograph, the passport of Satam al Suqami, one of the Flight 11 hijackers, was recovered by NYPD Detective Yuk H. Chin from a man in a business suit, about 30 years old. The man left before he could be identified, while debris was falling from the South Tower; the tower collapsed shortly afterward. [1]

Commission staff later found that the passport Suqami used for his visa had fraudulent travel stamps associated with al Qaeda. [2] Skeptics say the story is too convenient, and the unidentified passerby leaves it resting on one detective’s report. Paper, ID cards and other light items were thrown from the impact zones in large quantities.

What we can’t tell you. The passerby was never identified.

The sources

  1. 9/11 and Terrorist Travel, chapter 2: A chronology of the hijackers’ entries ↗

    Entry-by-entry record: the hijackers got into the United States 33 of the 34 times they tried.

  2. 9/11 Commission staff monograph: 9/11 and Terrorist Travel ↗

    How the hijackers got visas and entered the United States, with passport and border records.

The other documents

Flight 93 and the Pentagon.

The FBI agent who led the Flight 93 site said investigators were “shocked at the number of items” recovered there, including the hijackers’ passports, notes they had written for themselves and a knife. [1] Exhibits at the Moussaoui trial include a page from Ziad Jarrah’s passport with part of his US visa, found at the Flight 93 site, and identification cards from the Pentagon. [2]

The hijackers were identified mainly by other means: the passenger lists, the airline and phone records, their cars and luggage, and the cockpit recorder of Flight 93. Luggage recovered at Logan Airport held a four-page handwritten letter in Arabic, also in evidence at the trial. [2][3]

What we can’t tell you. The government has not released a full list of personal items recovered at each site.

The sources

  1. FBI video: investigation of Flight 93 ↗

    FBI agents and the county coroner describe the Shanksville recovery.

  2. U.S. District Court (E.D. Va.): United States v. Moussaoui, prosecution trial exhibits ↗

    The 2006 trial exhibits, including the cockpit voice recording transcript and the phone-call records from the four flights.

  3. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 1: “We Have Some Planes” ↗

    The minute-by-minute account of the four flights and of the FAA and NORAD response, including the 10:03:11 crash time of United 93 and when the shootdown order reached the pilots.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

3 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 162 rated claims ↗

← The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFiles911 shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFiles911.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.