COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

“Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams”

The most famous line in 9/11 doubt, and what the fires actually did

← Interactive guide and chronology · The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

Melting is not the issue

Steel does not have to melt to fail.

Structural steel melts at about 1,500°C. Ordinary building and jet-fuel fires reach up to about 1,100°C, and NIST reported top air temperatures of about 1,000°C in the towers. NIST says plainly: “In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires.” [1]

What matters is that bare steel at 1,000°C softens and keeps only about 10 percent of its strength at room temperature. Steel stripped of its fireproofing could reach the air temperature in the time the fires burned. The result was yielding and buckling, not melting. [1]

The jet fuel itself mostly burned off in fireballs within minutes. It spread the fires; office furniture, paper and fittings kept them going. [1]

What we can’t tell you. Reports of molten metal in the rubble are a separate question; see the molten metal file.

The sources

  1. NIST: Questions and answers about the NIST WTC towers investigation ↗

    NIST’s replies on free fall, molten metal, thermite (“many thousands of pounds”) and explosives.

The fireproofing question

Why the plane impacts mattered so much.

The steel in the towers was coated with sprayed insulation. The fire floors of the South Tower had the original coating, specified at half an inch; those of the North Tower had been upgraded to about two and a half inches. NIST found the thickness did not matter, because the plane debris and fuel knocked so much of it off. [1][2]

NIST also notes the towers were designed with a Boeing 707 impact in mind, but it could find no documentation of how that analysis was done or whether fires were considered. [1]

What we can’t tell you. How much fireproofing came off where is an estimate from models and tests, not a direct observation.

The sources

  1. NIST: Questions and answers about the NIST WTC towers investigation ↗

    NIST’s replies on free fall, molten metal, thermite (“many thousands of pounds”) and explosives.

  2. NIST NCSTAR 1: Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (2005) ↗

    The federal investigation’s report on why the towers fell.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

3 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 162 rated claims ↗

← The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFiles911 shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFiles911.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.