COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The 19 hijackers

Who they were, how they got in, and whether some are “still alive”

← Interactive guide and chronology · The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

Who they were

Pilots from Hamburg, and muscle mostly from Saudi Arabia.

The four pilots were Mohamed Atta (Egypt), Marwan al-Shehhi (UAE) and Ziad Jarrah (Lebanon), who had lived and studied in Hamburg, and Hani Hanjour (Saudi Arabia), who had learned to fly in the United States in the 1990s. Atta flew American 11, Shehhi United 175, Hanjour American 77 and Jarrah United 93. [1][2]

The other 13 were mostly young Saudis with little education, chosen for their willingness to die and their ability to get US visas. At the time Saudis were rarely interviewed for visas and did not have to fill in their applications fully. [4]

The FBI published their photographs on 27 September 2001, noting that “attempts to confirm the true identities of these individuals are still under way.” [3]

What we can’t tell you. Several hijackers used aliases at different times, which caused early confusion over names.

The sources

  1. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 5: Al Qaeda Aims at the American Homeland ↗

    KSM’s planes operation, the selection of the hijackers, financing, and the finding of no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior officials individually funded al Qaeda.

  2. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 7: The Attack Looms ↗

    The hijackers in San Diego and Florida, Bayoumi and Thumairy, Atta’s alleged Prague trip, transit through Iran, flight schools and the final preparations.

  3. FBI press release, 27 September 2001: photographs of the 19 individuals believed to be the hijackers ↗

    The FBI’s photographs, with the note that “attempts to confirm the true identities of these individuals are still under way.”

  4. 9/11 Commission staff monograph: 9/11 and Terrorist Travel ↗

    How the hijackers got visas and entered the United States, with passport and border records.

The nineteen, flight by flight

Who boarded which plane, and which of them a screening system flagged that morning.

American 11, from Boston: Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz al-Omari, Satam al-Suqami, Wail al-Shehri and Waleed al-Shehri. Atta and Omari had flown in from Portland, Maine, on a 6:00 a.m. flight. Atta was flagged by the airlines’ computer prescreening system, CAPPS, in Portland, and Suqami and the two Shehri brothers were flagged in Boston. [1]

United 175, also from Boston: Marwan al-Shehhi, Fayez Banihammad, Mohand al-Shehri, Ahmed al-Ghamdi and Hamza al-Ghamdi. None of them was flagged. [1]

American 77, from Washington Dulles: Hani Hanjour, Khalid al-Mihdhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Salem al-Hazmi. Hanjour, Mihdhar and Moqed were flagged by CAPPS; the Hazmi brothers were picked for extra scrutiny by a ticket agent, because one had no photo identification and could not understand English. Mihdhar and Moqed set off the first metal detector, and Moqed the second, before being cleared with a hand wand. The checkpoint camera recorded them. [1]

United 93, from Newark: Ziad Jarrah, Saeed al-Ghamdi, Ahmed al-Nami and Ahmad al-Haznawi. Haznawi was flagged, and his checked bag was screened for explosives before being loaded. That makes four men on the last plane, not five. [1]

In 2001 being flagged by CAPPS meant only that a passenger’s checked bags were held or screened; it did not mean a closer search at the checkpoint. [1]

What we can’t tell you. Transliterations of the names vary between the FBI, the Commission and the press.

The sources

  1. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 1: “We Have Some Planes” ↗

    The minute-by-minute account of the four flights and of the FAA and NORAD response, including the 10:03:11 crash time of United 93 and when the shootdown order reached the pilots.

How they got in

Thirty-three of 34 attempts succeeded.

Commission staff found the hijackers got into the United States 33 of the 34 times they tried. [1] Several passports bore signs of fraud, and some visa applications were incomplete or contained false statements that consular officers did not catch. Two hijackers were stopped and questioned by immigration inspectors; one of them, Mohamed al-Kahtani, a Saudi whom bin Laden had picked for the operation, was refused entry. [2][3]

In March 2002 a flight school in Venice, Florida, received the paperwork approving Atta’s and Shehhi’s change to student status. The Justice Department’s inspector general found the delay was a routine backlog, which itself showed how little the system was watching. [4]

What we can’t tell you. Visa records for some hijackers were destroyed under routine retention rules before investigators asked for them.

The sources

  1. 9/11 and Terrorist Travel, chapter 2: A chronology of the hijackers’ entries ↗

    Entry-by-entry record: the hijackers got into the United States 33 of the 34 times they tried.

  2. 9/11 and Terrorist Travel, chapter 5: Analysis of hijacker travel documents ↗

    Details of the passports and visa applications, including fraud indicators.

  3. 9/11 Commission staff monograph: 9/11 and Terrorist Travel ↗

    How the hijackers got visas and entered the United States, with passport and border records.

  4. DOJ Inspector General, May 2005: INS processing of student visas for Atta and Shehhi ↗

    Why flight-school approvals for two dead hijackers arrived in March 2002.

“Some of the hijackers are still alive”

The September 2001 BBC story and what became of it.

On 23 September 2001 the BBC reported that several men named on the FBI’s list, among them Waleed al-Shehri, Abdulaziz al-Omari and Saeed al-Ghamdi, were alive in Saudi Arabia or Morocco and protesting their innocence. [1] The story was widely repeated and is still quoted as proof the FBI’s list was false. Three days earlier, on 20 September, FBI Director Robert Mueller had said the identities of several hijackers were “still in question.” [6]

The FBI list was based on names on passenger manifests; the photographs came later. Common Arab names were shared by other men, and some early photographs were wrong. The FBI’s own release noted that identities were still being confirmed. [2] The Commission and the later trial record used the final 19, backed by seat assignments, airport video, phone calls from the planes naming seats, and identification of remains. [3][4]

In October 2006 the BBC’s Steve Herrmann wrote that the confusion arose from common Arabic names, that the BBC had changed the archive caption on Waleed al-Shehri, and that the FBI was confident it had identified all 19. [5]

What we can’t tell you. The BBC pages block scripted fetches; their content is confirmed by search results, not a direct read.

The sources

  1. BBC News, 23 September 2001: Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well ↗

    The early report that several men named by the FBI were alive. Blocks scripted fetches; confirmed by search.

  2. FBI press release, 27 September 2001: photographs of the 19 individuals believed to be the hijackers ↗

    The FBI’s photographs, with the note that “attempts to confirm the true identities of these individuals are still under way.”

  3. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 1: “We Have Some Planes” ↗

    The minute-by-minute account of the four flights and of the FAA and NORAD response, including the 10:03:11 crash time of United 93 and when the shootdown order reached the pilots.

  4. U.S. District Court (E.D. Va.): United States v. Moussaoui, prosecution trial exhibits ↗

    The 2006 trial exhibits, including the cockpit voice recording transcript and the phone-call records from the four flights.

  5. BBC editors’ blog, 27 October 2006: “9/11 conspiracy theory,” by Steve Herrmann ↗

    The BBC on its 2001 “alive” story: confusion over common names, a changed archive caption, and the FBI’s confidence in the 19. Blocks scripted fetches; confirmed by search.

  6. Los Angeles Times, 21 September 2001: FBI chief raises new doubts over hijackers’ identities (Internet Archive copy) ↗

    Robert Mueller says some hijackers may have used stolen identities. Confirmed by search.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

5 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 162 rated claims ↗

← The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFiles911 shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFiles911.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.