The plot

Why they did it: the Letter to America

Bin Laden’s grievances, and why a 2002 text went viral on TikTok in 2023

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Documented

The letter and the grievances in it are real and documented. Taking the grievances seriously as an explanation of the attackers’ motives is not the same as agreeing with them, and the letter’s antisemitism and calls for violence were often left out of the viral clips.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

3 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

DOCUMENTED Al Qaeda, the plot & the hijackers

“Al Qaeda attacked because of U.S. policy in the Middle East.”

Its own statements cite U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, Iraq sanctions, support for Israel and for Arab rulers. Explaining a motive is not justifying it.

Who says it: Al Qaeda; many analysts.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

DOCUMENTED Al Qaeda, the plot & the hijackers

“The Guardian took down bin Laden’s “Letter to America” after it went viral on TikTok.”

The Guardian removed it on 15 November 2023, saying it had been shared without context; TikTok removed videos and blocked the hashtag.

Who says it: News reports.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

FALSE Al Qaeda, the plot & the hijackers

“The Letter to America is a fair critique of U.S. policy that the media suppressed.”

Parts discuss foreign policy, but the full letter includes antisemitic and homophobic language and calls for violence, which the viral clips mostly skipped.

Who says it: TikTok videos.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 162 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Federation of American Scientists: World Islamic Front statement, 23 February 1998 ↗

    The fatwa calling it a duty to kill Americans, civilian and military.

  2. Al Jazeera, 1 November 2004: full transcript of bin Laden’s speech ↗

    Bin Laden says he decided to strike the towers and explains why.

  3. 9/11 Commission Report, chapter 2: The Foundation of the New Terrorism ↗

    Bin Laden’s background, his 1996 and 1998 declarations, his years in Sudan and Afghanistan, and the finding of no “collaborative operational relationship” with Iraq.

  4. The Guardian, 16 November 2023: TikTok to remove videos promoting bin Laden’s letter ↗

    The 2023 wave of interest in the 2002 “Letter to America.”

  5. 404 Media, November 2023: Guardian deletes bin Laden’s Letter to America after it goes viral ↗

    The Guardian removed the text it had hosted since 2002.

  6. NBC News, November 2023: TikTok removes hashtag after bin Laden letter goes viral ↗

    The platform response.

← The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFiles911 shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFiles911.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.