COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The 9/11 Commission’s limits

What the official inquiry could not get, did not ask, and kept secret

← Interactive guide and chronology · The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

The fight for access

Subpoenas and complaints.

While the Commission worked, Commissioner Max Cleland told Salon the Commission had had to subpoena the FAA and NORAD, and called the deal over access to White House intelligence briefings “a national scandal.” [1] In 2008 the chairman and vice chairman, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, wrote that the CIA never told them about videotapes of interrogations that it later destroyed. [2]

The BBC reported in 2026 that FBI material on Omar al-Bayoumi, including an airplane sketch, was kept from the Commission. [3] See the Bayoumi file.

What we can’t tell you. Complaints about access are not evidence the conclusions are false.

The sources

  1. Salon, November 2003: Max Cleland on the 9/11 Commission ↗

    A Commission member, before resigning, calls the deal over access to White House intelligence briefings “a national scandal.”

  2. New York Times, 2 January 2008: “Stonewalled by the C.I.A.,” by Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton ↗

    The Commission’s chairman and vice chairman say the CIA never told them about interrogation videotapes it later destroyed. Blocks scripted fetches; confirmed by search.

  3. BBC Panorama, 7 September 2026: new videos of man in 9/11 lawsuit reveal extremist links ↗

    Videos recovered from Bayoumi’s home and what they show.

The man who ran the staff

Philip Zelikow, Condoleezza Rice and the calls from Karl Rove.

The Commission’s executive director, Philip Zelikow, had written a book with Condoleezza Rice in 1995 and, at her request, had reviewed counterterrorism on the Bush transition team; the inquiry was examining how Rice, as national security adviser, handled the al Qaeda threat. In 2008 the New York Times reporter Philip Shenon wrote in The Commission that Zelikow spoke with Rice several times during the investigation, and that the office’s phone logs showed at least four calls from Karl Rove in 2003. [1][3]

Shenon also reported that Zelikow told his assistant to stop logging his White House calls, and that the general counsel told her to keep doing it; that Zelikow tried to strengthen draft wording linking bin Laden and Iraq against his staff’s view; and that Commissioner Bob Kerrey, on learning of the ties, told chairman Tom Kean, “either he goes or I go.” Kerrey stayed. [1]

Zelikow responded that he was authorized to talk to White House officials, that his contacts with Rove were brief and concerned University of Virginia business, and that the Commission had no phone logs to stop. The vice chairman, Lee Hamilton, called him “a person of integrity” and said: “Did he try to sway the report to protect the administration? I think the answer was no.” [1][2]

What we can’t tell you. The account of the phone-log instruction comes from Shenon’s sources; Zelikow denies it, and the logs themselves have not been published.

The sources

  1. Associated Press via NBC’s Today, 3 February 2008: “New book sheds light on 9/11 investigation” ↗

    Philip Shenon’s findings on Philip Zelikow’s White House contacts, with Zelikow’s written response and Lee Hamilton’s defense of him.

  2. Democracy Now!, 7 February 2008: interview with Philip Zelikow ↗

    Zelikow answers Shenon’s account of the Rove calls and the phone-log instruction.

  3. Democracy Now!, 5 February 2008: interview with Philip Shenon on The Commission ↗

    Shenon on Zelikow’s ties to Rice, his role on the transition team, and the Rove calls.

What has been released since

Twenty-two years later.

In November 2022 the National Archives released the memorandum of the Commission’s joint interview with President Bush and Vice President Cheney. [2] On 11 September 2026 it released the Commission’s 7,000-word summary of every President’s Daily Brief on al Qaeda and bin Laden in the three years before 9/11, along with interview records of Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Condoleezza Rice and others. [1] The CIA released the underlying brief items the same day. [3]

What we can’t tell you. Some records remain classified or redacted.

The sources

  1. Public Interest Declassification Board (National Archives), 11 September 2026: Long-sought 9/11 records now declassified ↗

    The release of the Commission’s 7,000-word summary of three years of President’s Daily Briefs and its interviews with Rice, Berger, Clarke, Scheuer and Tenet.

  2. National Archives, Public Interest Declassification Board blog, 9 November 2022: declassified 9/11 Commission interviews with Bush and Cheney ↗

    The joint interview of 29 April 2004, released in redacted form in 2022.

  3. CIA, 11 September 2026: 71 declassified 9/11-related President’s Daily Brief products ↗

    The underlying PDB items from February 1998 onward.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

6 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 162 rated claims ↗

← The 9/11 hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFiles911 shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFiles911.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.