Money

Whitewater

A failed land deal, a failed savings and loan, and a seven-year investigation

Kenneth W. Starr, independent counsel from 1994 to 1999, in an official portrait as U.S. solicitor general.
U.S. federal government · Source & image context ↗

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Partners convicted / Clintons not charged

There were real crimes in the Whitewater story; the McDougals were convicted. The independent counsel found Hillary Clinton’s explanations inaccurate in places but not provably false, and found insufficient evidence to charge either Clinton.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Independent Counsel final report, Volume II Part A: Clintons, McDougals and Whitewater ↗

    Final prosecutorial report. Separate the actual fraud from insufficient evidence of the Clintons’ knowing involvement.

  2. United States v. McDougal, Eighth Circuit opinion, February 23, 1998 ↗

    An appellate opinion affirming Susan McDougal’s financial convictions, republished by FindLaw; it is not a trial or conviction of either Clinton.

  3. Associated Press: Whitewater investigation ends, September 21, 2000 (Notre Dame newspaper archive) ↗

    Contemporaneous AP report of the charging decision. It does not make a jury finding about the Clintons.

  4. Independent Counsel final report, Volume II Part B Chapter 3: Hillary Clinton’s Madison representation ↗

    Examines Hillary’s legal work, statements and billing records; inaccurate statements were not established as knowingly false beyond reasonable doubt.

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesClintons shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesClintons.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.