Money

Uranium One

“She sold 20 percent of our uranium to Russia.” What the deal was, and who decided it.

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Donations documented / quid pro quo unproven

The donations and the $500,000 speech are real and the timing looks bad. But “sold 20 percent of our uranium” is wrong in several ways, and the deal went through nine agencies and a separate nuclear regulator. No investigation has shown Clinton intervened.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. FactCheck.org: the facts on Uranium One, October 2017 ↗

    Reconstructs transaction dates, donor connections, U.S. production-capacity figures and NRC statements. Public transaction records have confidentiality limits.

  2. FactCheck.org: Clinton lacked unilateral veto power over Uranium One, April 2015 ↗

    Contemporaneous assessment of Clinton Cash and the original New York Times reporting. Separates disclosure failures and conflicts from proof Clinton personally directed approval.

  3. Treasury testimony explaining the CFIUS process ↗

    Official description of interagency review, disagreement and presidential decision authority. Useful for institutional mechanics, not a released vote-by-vote Uranium One transaction file.

  4. Grassley letter and released FBI records: Uranium One and foundation inquiries, April 27, 2026 ↗

    April 2026 oversight letter plus preliminary-investigation records and later summaries. Grassley asks what the investigations concluded; allegations in opening records are not final findings.

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesClintons shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesClintons.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.