COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The 1996 fundraising scandal

Foreign money, the Lincoln Bedroom and the guilty pleas

← Interactive guide and chronology · All Clinton cases

The foreign money

Illegal contributions are documented; so are the guilty pleas.

In January 2001 the Justice Department announced James Riady of Indonesia’s Lippo Group would plead guilty to conspiracy, and he and LippoBank would pay $8.61 million, for reimbursing political donations with foreign corporate money. [1]

John Huang, a former Lippo executive who became a Commerce official and then a DNC fundraiser, pleaded guilty in August 1999 to conspiring to disguise the sources of contributions. The FEC’s file on the DNC, matter 4547, ran for years and ended in conciliation agreements. [2][3]

What we can’t tell you. Whether China’s government directed any of the money was alleged by Senate Republicans and never settled.

The sources

  1. DOJ: James Riady plea agreement announced, January 11, 2001 ↗

    Dated original record; distinguish the proceeding, institutional perspective and outcome described.

  2. DOJ: John Huang pleads guilty, August 12, 1999 ↗

    Dated original record; distinguish the proceeding, institutional perspective and outcome described.

  3. FEC: matter under review 4547, decisions and conciliation records ↗

    Dated original record; distinguish the proceeding, institutional perspective and outcome described.

The Lincoln Bedroom and coffees

Big donors got time with the president. That part is not in dispute.

The Senate investigation documented White House coffees for donors and overnight stays, including in the Lincoln Bedroom. The Republican majority read it as selling access. The Democratic minority agreed the fundraising system was broken but disputed several of the legal conclusions drawn from the coffees and overnight visits. [1][2]

The sources

  1. Senate Report 105-167, volume 1: 1996 fundraising investigation ↗

    Dated original record; distinguish the proceeding, institutional perspective and outcome described.

  2. Senate Report 105-167, volume 4: additional and minority views ↗

    Dated original record; distinguish the proceeding, institutional perspective and outcome described.

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesClintons shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesClintons.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.