Money

The cattle futures

$1,000 into nearly $100,000

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Profits documented / bribery unproven

The trades and the return are documented. Experts called it exceptional but possible in a rising market. Suspicion that winning trades were steered to her account is reasonable to raise but was never proved.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Associated Press, March 30, 1994: released trading records and expert questions ↗

    AP’s contemporaneous account of the disclosures, political connections and expert uncertainty; no bribery finding.

  2. Contemporaneous report: previously unreported commodities income and back taxes ↗

    Contemporaneous journalism describing the White House’s disclosure of omitted income. A tax correction is different from proof of a deliberate tax crime.

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesClintons shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesClintons.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.