COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

“Funding secured”: the $420 tweet

An SEC fraud case, a $20 million penalty, and a jury that cleared him

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Musk hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

The SEC case

What the government alleged and what Musk agreed to.

On 7 August 2018, Musk tweeted: “Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured.” The SEC said he had not agreed on a price or confirmed terms with any funding source, and that the tweets were false and misleading. It charged him with securities fraud on 27 September. [1]

Two days later he settled. He and Tesla each paid a $20 million penalty, he stepped down as chairman for at least three years, Tesla added two independent directors, and the company agreed to review his communications. He neither admitted nor denied the allegations. The SEC’s distribution record shows the money went to investors. [1][2]

This was a civil case, not a criminal one. A settlement without admission is not a finding of fraud, though the penalty and the governance changes were real.

What we can’t tell you. The SEC’s factual claims were never tested at trial.

The sources

  1. SEC: Musk and Tesla settle securities fraud charges, 29 September 2018 ↗

    Official: $20 million each, Musk steps down as chairman, Tesla adds controls. No admission of wrongdoing.

  2. SEC: distribution record for the Musk and Tesla settlements ↗

    Court-supervised payout of the $40 million to investors.

The investors’ trial

Shareholders said the tweet cost them money. A jury said no.

Tesla investors brought a class action, arguing the tweets moved the stock and cost them money. On 3 February 2023, a federal jury in San Francisco found Musk and Tesla not liable. [1][2][3]

What we can’t tell you. Jurors did not explain their reasoning. An earlier ruling in the case on whether the tweets were false is not covered here.

The sources

  1. Reuters: Musk found not liable in trial over 2018 “funding secured” tweets, 3 February 2023 ↗

    Report of the unanimous civil jury verdict in the investor class action.

  2. AP: jury says Musk didn’t defraud investors with 2018 Tesla tweets, 3 February 2023 ↗

    Second account of the verdict.

  3. Fox Business: Musk not liable over take-private tweets, jury rules, 3 February 2023 ↗

    Right-leaning outlet. The verdict.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 161 rated claims ↗

← The Musk hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesMusk shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesMusk.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.