The evidence

The Zapruder film

The most studied 26 seconds of film ever: who owned it, what it shows, and was it altered?

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

Provenance documented; alteration unproven

The film’s history is documented, and it is a genuine camera-original. The claim that it was altered has no documentary support and is rejected by the film experts who examined the original.

THE EVENTS / THE INVESTIGATION / THE STORY

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 155 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Library of Congress, National Film Registry: essay on the Zapruder film ↗

    Daniel Eagan’s Film Registry essay: Life buys the film on 23 November 1963, sells it back to the Zapruders in 1975, the 1992 law makes it an assassination record, the government pays the estate $16 million in 1999, and the estate gives the copyright to the Sixth Floor Museum.

  2. ARRB final report, chapter 6 part II: medical, film and ballistics records ↗

    The Board’s account of gaps and errors in the autopsy record, and its statement that it was not reinvestigating the crime.

  3. Smithsonian Magazine: “The Zapruder film” ↗

    Popular history of the 26-second film and its owner.

  4. Roland Zavada: Analysis of Selected Motion Picture Photographic Evidence, 1998 (report files) ↗

    A retired Kodak film-structure expert’s study for the Review Board of the camera-original Zapruder film.

  5. Forum on Open Access v. Dallas County Historical Foundation, N.D. Tex., opinion of 5 August 2026 (Justia) ↗

    The lawsuit arguing the Zapruder film should be free to publish. Justia blocks scripted fetches; confirmed by search.

  6. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy: summary of Forum on Open Access v. Dallas County Historical Foundation (August 2026) ↗

    The government’s own case summary of the August 2026 ruling.

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.

← JFK case filesAll AI Files