COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The Hosty note

Oswald left a note at the FBI weeks before Dallas. The FBI destroyed it

← Interactive guide and chronology · The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

What the note said

Three memories, no document.

The FBI’s own 1975 inquiry established that Oswald visited the Dallas field office two or three weeks before the assassination, asked for Hosty, and left a note when told he was out, and that the note was destroyed afterward. [1]

The receptionist recalled it as: “Let this be a warning. I will blow up the FBI and the Dallas Police Department if you don’t stop bothering my wife.” Hosty recalled: “If you have anything you want to learn about me, come talk to me directly. If you don’t cease bothering my wife, I will take appropriate action and report this to proper authorities.” His supervisor remembered some kind of threat. [1]

What we can’t tell you. No copy survives.

The sources

  1. Church Committee, Book V: the investigation of the Kennedy assassination by the intelligence agencies (1976) ↗

    The Senate finding that the CIA and FBI did not tell the Warren Commission about the Castro plots, and that the agencies’ investigations were deficient.

Who ordered it destroyed

One agent’s word against his boss’s.

Hosty testified that about two hours after Oswald was pronounced dead on 24 November, the special agent in charge, J. Gordon Shanklin, told him to destroy the note and the memo Hosty had written about it, and that he did. Shanklin denied knowing anything about the visit or the note until July 1975. William Sullivan, then an assistant FBI director, told the Senate that Shanklin had mentioned an “internal problem” involving an agent who received a threatening message from Oswald. [1]

The Senate committee did not try to resolve the conflict. It found the evidence “replete with factual discrepancies.” Hosty himself had testified to the Warren Commission in 1964 that Oswald was never an FBI informant; the note’s existence was not disclosed to the Commission. The Review Board later recorded a three-day interview with Hosty. [1][3][2]

What we can’t tell you. The most plausible motive on the record is embarrassment: the FBI had a file on Oswald and had not warned anyone. That is inference.

The sources

  1. Church Committee, Book V: the investigation of the Kennedy assassination by the intelligence agencies (1976) ↗

    The Senate finding that the CIA and FBI did not tell the Warren Commission about the Castro plots, and that the agencies’ investigations were deficient.

  2. Assassination Records Review Board final report (1998): executive summary ↗

    What the 1992 JFK Records Act required and what the Board did in 1994–1998.

  3. Warren Commission report, chapter 6: investigation of possible conspiracy ↗

    The Commission’s review of the Soviet years, Mexico City, Cuba, New Orleans, Ruby’s associations and rumors; it found no evidence of a conspiracy.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

2 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 155 rated claims ↗

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.