COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The backyard photographs

Oswald with a rifle, a pistol and two Marxist newspapers: genuine or faked?

← Interactive guide and chronology · The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

What the House panel found

The camera, the negative and the shadows.

The FBI’s Lyndal Shaneyfelt matched the negative of one picture to Oswald’s Imperial Reflex camera by the marks its film gate left on the edges, and found no sign of compositing or retouching. Oswald, shown the picture in custody, said it was a fake. [1][2]

Doubts grew when copies differed from the originals. A British forensic photographer, Malcolm Thomson, told the BBC in 1978 that copies he examined were fakes; a Canadian defense photo analyst said the same. [1]

The House committee found more originals. A first-generation print came from the widow of George de Mohrenschildt on 1 April 1977. A third pose, 133-C, came from the widow of Roscoe White, a former Dallas policeman. Former detective Richard Stovall, who was at the search, produced two more prints. [1]

The panel studied the shadows, the chin, the head and the background, measured them, and viewed the photos in stereo. It concluded: “The panel detects no evidence of fakery in any of the backyard picture materials.” Thomson, shown its report, deferred to its conclusions and said his earlier view was based on copies, though he still thought the chin looked different. [1]

What we can’t tell you. The House panel had no original negative for one of the poses.

The sources

  1. HSCA photographic panel: authenticity of the backyard photographs, volume VI ↗

    The panel’s study of the negative, the camera and the shadows. It found no fakery.

  2. Warren Commission report, chapter 4: the assassin ↗

    The rifle order from Klein’s under the name A. Hidell, the paper bag, the palm print, the Marine scores (212 in 1956, 191 in 1959), the Tippit evidence and the paraffin test the Commission did not rely on.

The shadow and stance studies

Later computer tests.

In 2010 Dartmouth computer scientist Hany Farid built a 3-D model of Oswald’s head and the scene and found that the nose shadow critics call impossible is consistent with a single sun. In 2015 his group modeled Oswald’s center of mass and found the pose critics call off-balance physically stable. [1][2]

What we can’t tell you. These studies used published images, not the originals.

The sources

  1. Hany Farid: “A 3-D Photo Forensic Analysis of the Lee Harvey Oswald Backyard Photo,” Dartmouth, 2010 ↗

    A computer model showing the shadows are consistent with one sun.

  2. Dartmouth: 2015 study of Oswald’s stance in the backyard photo ↗

    Center-of-mass analysis showing the pose is physically stable.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

1 claim people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 155 rated claims ↗

← The JFK hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesJFK shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesJFK.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.