COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

The 51 spies who signed the letter

“The classic earmarks of a Russian information operation”, and how it was used

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Biden Family hub: the story, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

What the letter said

And what it was used for.

The statement, signed by former CIA directors John Brennan, Michael Hayden, Leon Panetta and John McLaughlin among others, said the emails’ arrival had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” It also said: “We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by the President’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not, and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement.” [1]

Three days later, at the last presidential debate, Biden answered Trump’s “laptop from hell” taunts by citing the signers: “There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this — he’s accusing me of is a Russian plan.” The caveat did not travel with the headline. [2]

What we can’t tell you. Politico’s original headline, “Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say”, went further than the letter.

The sources

  1. Original public statement by 51 former intelligence officials, October 19, 2020; congressional PDF ↗

    Original seven-page statement, including explicit acknowledgement of no evidence of Russian involvement. The authors were former officials speaking publicly, not issuing a current intelligence-community assessment.

  2. CBS News, May 2023: Republicans release report on former intelligence officials’ laptop letter ↗

    The committee report on how the 51-signer letter came about, including Michael Morell’s testimony about Antony Blinken.

  3. House Intelligence Republican majority: investigation of the letter’s origins, June 2024 ↗

    Republican committee majority’s investigation and interpretation. Attribute its political-operation conclusions; the signatories’ original text remains separately linked.

Morell, Blinken and the CIA

Where the letter came from.

In 2023 testimony to House Republicans, former acting CIA director Michael Morell said that Antony Blinken, then a Biden campaign adviser, called him after the Post story and “set in motion the events that led” to the statement, and the committees cited organizers’ emails showing it was meant to help Biden in the campaign’s final weeks. Democrats released more of the interview, in which Morell said of Blinken: “My memory is that he did not, right. My memory is that he asked me what I thought.” Blinken denied asking for the statement but did not dispute that his call was its impetus, the Republicans said. [1]

In June 2024 House Intelligence Republicans added that the letter went through the CIA’s prepublication review and that some signers were working as CIA contractors at the time. Trump’s first-day executive order, EO 14152, revoked the clearances of the signers, saying they “coordinated with the Biden campaign” and “falsely suggested” a Russian operation. [2][3]

What we can’t tell you. The committees are Republican-led; neither Morell’s full transcript nor the CIA’s records are public.

The sources

  1. CBS News, May 2023: Republicans release report on former intelligence officials’ laptop letter ↗

    The committee report on how the 51-signer letter came about, including Michael Morell’s testimony about Antony Blinken.

  2. House Intelligence Republican majority: investigation of the letter’s origins, June 2024 ↗

    Republican committee majority’s investigation and interpretation. Attribute its political-operation conclusions; the signatories’ original text remains separately linked.

  3. Federal Register, 29 January 2025: Executive Order 14152, Holding Former Government Officials Accountable for Election Interference and Improper Disclosure of Sensitive Governmental Information ↗

    Revokes the security clearances of the letter’s signers.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

5 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 126 rated claims ↗

← The Biden Family hub: the story, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesBiden shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesBiden.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.