COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

Young blood, “vampires” and cryonics

What he said about parabiosis, what he denied, and his plan to be frozen

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Thiel hub: biography, timeline and every file · What people say ↓

What he said and what he denied

The blood story, step by step.

In August 2016 Inc. published an interview in which Thiel discussed his interest in parabiosis, the study of what happens when young blood circulates in older bodies. The New Republic and others turned it into vampire satire. [1][2]

In 2017 Jesse Karmazin, founder of Ambrosia, a start-up selling young-plasma infusions, told TechCrunch he “was never contacted by Thiel or anyone associated with Thiel Capital.” Inc.’s reporter answered that Karmazin had told him in July 2016 that Thiel Capital’s medical director had expressed interest, and Gizmodo, citing emails, reported that “the original story remains accurate.” [3][4]

Thiel told the DealBook conference in 2018: “I want to publicly tell you that I’m not a vampire. On the record, I am not a vampire.” [5]

In 2019 the FDA said it was not aware of evidence that young-donor plasma had any clinical benefit against aging and warned of risks. [6]

What we can’t tell you. Private medical decisions are not public.

The sources

  1. Inc.: Jeff Bercovici interview, 1 August 2016 ↗

    The original interview where he said he was looking into parabiosis.

  2. The New Republic: vampire satire, 1 August 2016 ↗

    How the story turned into a meme. Satire and commentary.

  3. TechCrunch: Ambrosia founder disputes reported contact, 14 June 2017 ↗

    Ambrosia’s founder told TechCrunch no one from Thiel’s team contacted him.

  4. Gizmodo: someone is trying to discredit the young-blood story, 16 June 2017 ↗

    The pushback: the founder had earlier told Inc. the opposite.

  5. The Independent: Thiel says “I am not a vampire”, 2 November 2018 ↗

    His DealBook denial that he has injected young people’s blood.

  6. FDA: warning on young-donor plasma infusions, 2019 ↗

    Official warning that the infusions have no proven benefit.

The freezing plan

In his own words.

Fortune reported in 2023 that Thiel said he still planned to be frozen after death, recalling a 2014 report that he had signed with the cryonics firm Alcor. He said: “I don’t necessarily expect it to work, but I think it’s the sort of thing we’re supposed to try to do.” [1][2]

What we can’t tell you. His current arrangements are not public.

The sources

  1. Fortune: Thiel will be frozen after death but doubts it works, 4 May 2023 ↗

    Reports his remarks to Bari Weiss and the 2014 Telegraph report that he signed with Alcor.

  2. New York Post: Thiel still plans to be frozen after death, 5 May 2023 ↗

    Quotes “I don’t necessarily expect it to work, but I think it’s the sort of thing we’re supposed to try to do.”

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

5 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 153 rated claims ↗

← The Thiel hub: biography, timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesThiel shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesThiel.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.