COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

Edgewood Arsenal

The Army’s own human experiments.

← Interactive guide and chronology · The MKUltra File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

The strongest version of this theory

The military used its own soldiers as lab animals.

Veterans said for decades that they were used as test subjects and then abandoned. [1] Their case reached the federal courts, where the government did not deny the experiments happened. [2]

The sources

  1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: Edgewood/Aberdeen Experiments ↗

    VA summary: about 7,000 soldiers exposed to more than 250 chemicals in classified Army tests, 1955–1975.

  2. Vietnam Veterans of America v. CIA, No. 13-17430 (9th Cir.), amended opinion, 26 January 2016 ↗

    Holds that the Army has a continuing duty to warn former test subjects and, by majority, to provide medical care.

What is documented

Soldiers, chemicals and a court ruling.

The Department of Veterans Affairs says that from 1955 to 1975 the Army Chemical Corps ran classified studies at Edgewood Arsenal. About 7,000 soldiers were exposed to more than 250 different chemicals, including nerve agents such as sarin, mustard agents, the incapacitant BZ, and LSD and PCP. The VA notes that long-term follow-up “was not planned”, and that a 2016 report to the Defense Department found no significant effects in subjects’ later health; the National Academies reviewed that report in 2018. [1]

In Vietnam Veterans of America v. CIA, the Ninth Circuit noted that “tens of thousands” of service members were exposed in chemical and biological experiments from World War I to the mid-1970s. In its 2016 amended opinion it agreed that the Army has an ongoing, enforceable duty to give former test subjects “newly acquired information” about their health. [2]

The CIA’s link is through MKNAOMI, its long joint project with the Army’s Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick. [3]

What we can’t tell you. Edgewood was an Army program. It is not proof that every Edgewood test was part of MKULTRA.

The sources

  1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: Edgewood/Aberdeen Experiments ↗

    VA summary: about 7,000 soldiers exposed to more than 250 chemicals in classified Army tests, 1955–1975.

  2. Vietnam Veterans of America v. CIA, No. 13-17430 (9th Cir.), amended opinion, 26 January 2016 ↗

    Holds that the Army has a continuing duty to warn former test subjects and, by majority, to provide medical care.

  3. Church Committee: Final Report, Book I, Foreign and Military Intelligence (1976), section on testing and use of chemical and biological agents ↗

    The committee’s 1976 account of BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKE, MKULTRA, MKDELTA, MKNAOMI, MKSEARCH, the Olson case, the 1973 destruction and the Army’s overseas LSD interrogations. Written before the 1977 discovery of the financial files.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

2 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 91 rated claims ↗

← The MKUltra File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesMKUltra shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesMKUltra.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.