The case for, the case against and what would change it.
The strongest case that the allegations are credible is their number and their pattern. Accusers from different families and decades describe similar grooming: gifts, attention, separation from parents, nights in his room. The 1993 prosecutors said they found the boy credible. [1] Robson and Safechuck give detailed accounts. [2] The 2005 judge let the jury hear earlier allegations as possible evidence of a pattern. [5] Jackson himself defended sharing his bed with children.
The strongest case against is just as concrete. The only jury acquitted him. [8] The main accusers have sued for money, Robson testified under oath in 2005 that nothing happened [3], and at least one account has a provable error of time and place. [4] The Cascio siblings defended him for decades before suing. [6] Many people who spent time with him as children, such as Macaulay Culkin, deny anything happened. [7]
Reasonable people reach different conclusions from this record, and this collection does not pretend otherwise. What can be said is that the allegations are serious, specific and unproven; that “credible” and “proven” are different words; and that a civil trial in 2028, if it happens, would be the first time any of these accounts is tested in court since 2005.
Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.