COMPLETE STATIC READING EDITION

Sony, Mottola and “Sony killed him”

A public war with his record label, and the theory that grew from it.

← Interactive guide and chronology · The Michael Jackson Files hub: the history, the full timeline and every file · What people say ↓

“Very, very, very devilish”

What Jackson said about Tommy Mottola, and why.

In July 2002 Jackson stood with Al Sharpton in Harlem and accused the record industry of exploiting Black artists. He named Tommy Mottola, the chairman of Sony Music, calling him “racist” and “very, very, very devilish”. [1]

The dispute had a business core. Jackson believed Sony had failed to promote Invincible, his 2001 album, and the contract that would return his master recordings to him was coming due. Sony said it had spent heavily on the album and rejected the accusations. [1]

Sharpton, who hosted the event, said within days that he did not share the charge of racism against Mottola. [2] No court or inquiry ever examined Jackson’s accusation. It is a documented accusation, not a documented fact.

The strongest version of Jackson’s side is that a major label lost interest in an aging star with a costly record and wanted his share of Sony/ATV, in which Sony held an option. [3] The strongest version of Sony’s side is that Invincible sold millions and that a business dispute became a public attack. Both can be true without either party being racist or criminal.

What we can’t tell you. Contemporary reporting records both sides. No document settles what Sony’s executives intended.

The sources

  1. Los Angeles Times: Michael Jackson says he’s not in harmony with Sony (July 7, 2002) ↗

    Contemporary report of the Harlem speech and Sony’s response.

  2. Entertainment Weekly: Al Sharpton disavows Jackson’s racism accusations (July 8, 2002) ↗

    Reports Sharpton distancing himself from the charge against Mottola.

  3. Briefly Taxing: summary of Estate of Jackson v. Commissioner (May 3, 2021) ↗

    A tax practitioner’s summary with the parties’ and the court’s figures and the penalty ruling. Secondary; checked against the opinion.

“Sony killed him for the catalog”

The theory, the motive and the missing link.

The strongest version of this theory goes like this: Jackson was deep in debt, his half of Sony/ATV was pledged, Sony wanted all of it, and within seven years of his death Sony owned it. His sister La Toya said in 2009 that he was murdered for his music publishing, and that he had told her people wanted to kill him for it. [1][2]

The motive part has a basis. Sony did end up owning the whole of Sony/ATV, paying the estate $750 million in 2016. [3] But the deal was a negotiated purchase from his estate, seven years later. Sony did not acquire the stake through his death; it paid for it.

The theory also needs a link between Sony and the man who gave him the propofol. Conrad Murray was hired for the This Is It tour, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, and lost his appeal. [4][5] No investigation, trial or lawsuit produced evidence that Sony directed him. In the AEG wrongful-death trial, which went through the tour’s finances in detail, Sony was not a defendant and no such evidence emerged.

Jackson’s fears were real to him and La Toya’s claim is sincerely made. A motive without any evidence of an act does not make a murder case.

What we can’t tell you. Proving a negative is impossible. This rating reflects the absence of evidence in the criminal and civil records, not a finding that no one at Sony ever wished him ill.

The sources

  1. ABC News (Australia): Jackson was murdered, says the star’s sister (July 12, 2009) ↗

    La Toya Jackson’s claim as she made it. A claim, not evidence of a plot.

  2. Rolling Stone: La Toya Jackson says Michael was murdered by a “shadowy entourage” (2009) ↗

    Her fuller account, including the money motive she alleged.

  3. U.S. Tax Court: Estate of Michael J. Jackson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2021-48, full opinion (May 3, 2021; practitioner mirror) ↗

    The 271-page opinion by Judge Mark Holmes. Primary source for the valuation fight, the 1985 ATV purchase, the 1995 Sony/ATV deal, the debts and the 2016 sale. The court says it makes no judgment about the allegations.

  4. LAPD, November 7, 2011: guilty verdict in Conrad Murray involuntary-manslaughter case ↗

    Investigating agency's statement confirms the verdict; praise of its own investigation is the agency's assessment.

  5. People v. Murray — Appellate decision (15 January 2014) ↗

    Read the linked source, its date and its stated scope; a historical report does not establish every later development.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

All 99 rated claims ↗

← The Michael Jackson Files hub: the history, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #AIFilesMJ shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings are shown on the interactive edition. This plain reading edition does not load them.

On X

This plain reading edition does not load posts. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #AIFilesMJ.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.