Yes. Reuters’ report on the released autopsy records describes vitiligo, with areas of lost skin pigmentation. This is stronger evidence than deciding whether to believe a television explanation based on before-and-after photographs. [1]
NIH describes vitiligo as a disorder involving loss of pigment-producing cells, producing light patches that can spread. A person with extensive disease may not resemble the small, sharply bounded patches familiar from a single medical illustration. That general information explains why appearance alone is a poor way to dismiss the diagnosis; it does not establish which specific treatments Jackson used. [2]
The medical finding does not answer every question about cosmetic procedures, makeup or how photographs were lit and reproduced. Nor does it establish that Jackson wanted to change his racial identity. Those are additional claims needing their own evidence. A factual correction here is narrow but important: the underlying skin condition was real, not something disproved by the fact that his appearance changed. [1][2]