ORIGINS / THE MIDDLEMEN

The middlemen

Errichetti, Criden and the men who sold the sheikh names.

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

DOCUMENTED

Every official the FBI approved for a bribe meeting except one had first been named by a middleman. The committee found that reliance brought at least one clearly innocent official before the cameras.

THE EVENTS / THE CLAIM / THE RECORD

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

3 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

FALSE Mel Weinberg & the middlemen

“Anyone a middleman named was corrupt.”

Middlemen named officials who were innocent; the committee said at least one clearly innocent official was brought before the cameras.

Who says it: Rumor at the time.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 97 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Senate Report 97-682, Summary of findings and conclusions (printed pp. 11–25) ↗

    Primary committee report, December 15, 1982. Bipartisan select committee (4 R, 4 D). Findings on informant control, authorization, recording failures, leaks and harm to innocent people.

  2. Senate Report 97-682, Part on selection of subjects and the “Republicans” requests (printed pp. 60–80) ↗

    Primary. Records the September 18 and October 9, 1979 recorded requests for Republican and non-Atlantic targets and the committee’s conclusion that no predicate existed for them.

  3. Senate Report 97-682, Appendix G: House Judiciary subcommittee summaries of the ABSCAM trials ↗

    Primary appendix compiling indictment, trial, verdict and sentencing dates for Jenrette, Myers, Kelly, Thompson–Murphy, Lederer and Williams. Some sentencing details postdate it and are taken from later sources.

  4. DOJ Public Integrity Section, Significant Cases (ABSCAM entries and Operation Lost Trust) ↗

    Prosecutor’s institutional summary. Contains at least one date typo (Lederer resignation printed as 1991; correct year 1981). Cross-checked against court and House records.

  5. Senate Report 97-682, The Pressler meeting and harm to innocent persons ↗

    Primary. Approval within an hour on November 7, 1979; the committee calls Pressler clearly innocent and injured by leaks.

  6. United States v. Myers, 527 F. Supp. 1206 (E.D.N.Y. 1981) — published district-court opinion ↗

    Contemporaneous trial-court opinion on constitutional challenges, published on Justia. Its description of refusals is not a finding that every aspect of every meeting was beyond ethical criticism.

← The ABSCAM File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #Abscam shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #Abscam.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.