THE CLAIMS / COVER-UP

Were more members involved, and covered up?

The names that never went to court, and why.

RECORD / AT A GLANCE

UNPROVEN

No evidence shows members who took money were protected. The committee found no lead dropped for an improper purpose. The House ethics committee’s 1981 decision not to charge Murtha is the strongest case for a soft-pedal, and it was a judgment about a refusal, not a hidden bribe.

THE EVENTS / THE CLAIM / THE RECORD

The chronology.

READ THE FILE

Evidence & assessment.

Open an article for its evidence, labeled AI assessment and numbered sources. Read the complete static edition ↗

WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT THIS FILE

The claims, rated.

4 claims people make about this file, each rated documented, partly true, disputed, unproven or false. Think a rating is wrong? Use Dispute or Support, or join the Discussion.

UNPROVEN Political hit & cover-up

“More members took money and were covered up.”

No evidence shows uncharged members who took money; the committee found no lead dropped for an improper purpose.

Who says it: Rumor; Weinberg’s later remarks.

The evidence in this file ↗ · On the full claims board ↗

All 97 rated claims ↗

OPEN THE RECORD

Sources & limits.

Numbered citations in each article identify the relevant sources. These records have different purposes and evidentiary weight.

  1. Senate Report 97-682, Summary of findings and conclusions (printed pp. 11–25) ↗

    Primary committee report, December 15, 1982. Bipartisan select committee (4 R, 4 D). Findings on informant control, authorization, recording failures, leaks and harm to innocent people.

  2. CNSNews, 2006: Murtha’s Abscam past (ethics vote, Prettyman resignation, Bailey letter) ↗

    Right-leaning outlet writing during a 2006 leadership race; used only for attributed quotations (Prettyman, Bailey) and the July 1981 committee vote, which other accounts confirm.

  3. Senate Report 97-682, Part on selection of subjects and the “Republicans” requests (printed pp. 60–80) ↗

    Primary. Records the September 18 and October 9, 1979 recorded requests for Republican and non-Atlantic targets and the committee’s conclusion that no predicate existed for them.

  4. Senate Report 97-682, The Pressler meeting and harm to innocent persons ↗

    Primary. Approval within an hour on November 7, 1979; the committee calls Pressler clearly innocent and injured by leaks.

  5. FBI — ABSCAM historical overview ↗

    An institutional retrospective by the investigating agency. Its compressed claim that convictions were upheld needs count-by-count qualification; the legal files discuss Murphy and Kelly.

← The ABSCAM File hub: the history, the full timeline and every file

Discussion

Comment, dispute or support a claim, submit a source or rate this page through a short Google Form. It asks you to sign in with Google so we know you are a real person; your email is never shown. Nothing appears here until it has been reviewed. Conversation on X tagged #AIFiles #Abscam shows up below after the daily refresh.

CommentSubmit a sourceRate this pageStart a discussion on XFull forum topicSee all disputesFollow updates (Google Group)

Reader comments

Approved reader comments and ratings appear here when JavaScript is on.

On X

Posts from the daily snapshot appear here when JavaScript is on. You can read this subject’s threads on the forum: Forum: #Abscam.

Reader comments are shown only after review, and rows removed from the form’s sheet disappear at the next refresh. X posts are a read-only daily snapshot; posts deleted or made private there are removed at the next refresh. Inclusion is not endorsement. A submitted source stays pending review until a page update says otherwise.